Where does all the gold come from?
File photo shows gold nuggets on display in Jamestown, California. Were it not for meteorites striking Earth some four billion years ago, humans would never have laid eyes on the gold that has raised and ruined civilisations, according to a study published Thursday.
Ultra high precision analyses of some of the oldest rock samples on Earth by researchers at the University of Bristol provides clear evidence that the planet's accessible reserves of precious metals are the result of a bombardment of meteorites more than 200 million years after the Earth was formed. The research is published today in Nature.
During the formation of the Earth, molten iron sank to its centre to make the core. This took with it the vast majority of the planet's precious metals such as gold and platinum. In fact, there are enough precious metals in the core to cover the entire surface of the Earth with a four metre thick layer.
The removal of gold to the core should leave the outer portion of the Earth bereft of bling. However, precious metals are tens to thousands of times more abundant in the Earth's silicate mantle than anticipated. It has previously been argued that this serendipitous over-abundance results from a cataclysmic meteorite shower that hit the Earth after the core formed. The full load of meteorite gold was thus added to the mantle alone and not lost to the deep interior.
To test this theory, Dr Matthias Willbold and Professor Tim Elliott of the Bristol Isotope Group in the School of Earth Sciences analysed rocks from Greenland that are nearly four billion years old, collected by Professor Stephen Moorbath of the University of Oxford. These ancient rocks provide a unique window into the composition of our planet shortly after the formation of the core but before the proposed meteorite bombardment.
The researchers determined the tungsten isotopic composition of these rocks. Tungsten (W) is a very rare element (one gram of rock contains only about one ten-millionth of a gram of tungsten) and, like gold and other precious elements, it should have entered the core when it formed. Like most elements, tungsten is comprised of several isotopes, atoms with the same chemical characteristics but slightly different masses. Isotopes provide robust fingerprints of the origin of material and the addition of meteorites to the Earth would leave a diagnostic mark on its W isotope composition.
Dr Willbold observed a 15 parts per million decrease in the relative abundance of the isotope 182W between the Greenland and modern day rocks. This small but significant change is in excellent agreement with that required to explain the excess of accessible gold on Earth as the fortunate by-product of meteorite bombardment.
Dr Willbold said: "Extracting tungsten from the rock samples and analysing its isotopic composition to the precision required was extremely demanding given the small amount of tungsten available in rocks. In fact, we are the first laboratory world-wide that has successfully made such high-quality measurements."
The impacting meteorites were stirred into the Earth's mantle by gigantic convection processes. A tantalising target for future work is to study how long this process took. Subsequently, geological processes formed the continents and concentrated the precious metals (and tungsten) in ore deposits which are mined today.
Dr Willbold continued: "Our work shows that most of the precious metals on which our economies and many key industrial processes are based have been added to our planet by lucky coincidence when the Earth was hit by about 20 billion billion tonnes of asteroidal material."
More information: 'The tungsten isotopic composition of the Earth's mantle before the terminal bombardment' Matthias Willbold, Tim Elliott and Stephen Moorbath Nature (2011).
Provided by
University of Bristol
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
4 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
18 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Land and sea species differ in climate change response: study
(Phys.org) -- Marine and terrestrial species will likely differ in their responses to climate warming, new research by Simon Fraser University and Australia’s University of Tasmania has found.
1 hour ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
3 hours ago |
4 / 5 (1) |
10
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
3 hours ago |
not rated yet |
1
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (14) |
39
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Almost half of new vets seek disability
(AP) -- America's newest veterans are filing for disability benefits at a historic rate, claiming to be the most medically and mentally troubled generation of former troops the nation has ever seen.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Sep 07, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (6)
Sep 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Sep 07, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Sep 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The impacts during the late heavy bombardment should indeed have added iron and precious metals. And without tectonics to mix the added material up, it should remain concentrated in impact craters (like Shootist's Sudbury example).
Sep 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (12)
Sep 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
Just in case: asteroids are big and fast moving, and make very deep holes when they hit.
Also many hit the ocean, and the ocean floor gets subducted and melted, and some of that melt come up in mountain ranges like the Andes (which are rich in gold and silver).
And even a few-mile deep gold mine is really just scratching the surface of the earth - it only seems deep because of our human scale.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
if your ever thru Sudbury make sure you stop at the Tim Hortons for a great doughnut..
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
That is an excellent point. I think the author's reason why is because the moon was not there yet. Of course one could also argue that if the moon is a result of a collision with Earth by a planetesimal, then the energy should have been enough to melt the earth again.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Also does this theory also apply to Uranium (for example)?
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Once the mantle solidified it would be much harder to separate out any metallic particles.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
I can only surmise that either theres no gold on other planets or the whole solar system was sprayed by a whole series of lucky coincidental impacts. Science?
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Either NO Gold on the other planets or this lucky asteroid strike was NOT specific to Earth. How, rubberman, do you presume any other alternatives based on the article content?
What have I missed? If there is near surface Gold on any other planet then the hypothesis in this article (big asteroid deposits Gold on Earth) is disproved.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
From what we know now we should be surprised if the LHB were specific to the earth and moon and missed everything else, and figure out why if so.
Also, don't take one scientist's off-hand comment about a "lucky coincidence" as if it is proven or widely accepted or even surprising at all.
He likely meant "lucky for us", not "extremely unlikely but happened anyway".
Given what we have seen of other planetary systems with the planets shuffling around after formation, the late heavy bombardment of this solar system is likely to be typical or even on the mild side.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (4)
But that was just my gut reaction. (Harvesting precious metals from craters makes a lot of sense to me though.)
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
I may be nuts, and you may be right. However, consider that the Moon only has 1/6th of Earth's gravity at its surface, and moreover is supposedly completely solid and cold all the way down. It also has no atmosphere. So where would the "pressures" come from?
I suppose even solid, cold, highly compacted rock could rapidly flow like a fluid under sufficient pressure, but would the pressure really be sufficient in the Moon's case?
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
With uniform density the gravitational force would decrease linearly and so would average half the surface value, so the pressure at the core would be 2.5 kPa/meter, or 2.5 MPa/km, times the radius of 1740 km. This is 4.35 GPa.
Tool steels can take ~300-350 MPa or ~12x less than this.
For a cross-check, this is ~200 times the pressure of the 2 km of ice in the last ice age. Rock is rebounding ~ 1/cm/year from that, so simple scaling would suggest the hole trying to close at ~2 meters radius per year at the bottom.
That would be sufficient to fracture the rock, leading to catastrophic collapse!
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
Now let's take into account a couple of additional things.
First, your pressure calculations effectively apply to liquids, but not so much to solids. For instance, how much pressure do you feel standing under a bridge, vs. pressure transmitted through the bridge's pylons? Keeping in mind that the moon is spherical, the higher layers don't transmit _all_ of their weight downward, because they self-support laterally to a certain degree just like an arch supports its own weight.
Secondly the density is of course not uniform and increases toward the core, so the pressure isn't as high when you approach the core -- whereas higher density closer to the core is mitigated by much lower gravitational acceleration.
Thirdly, one would think that highly compressed, cold rock will have achieved crystalline structures that greatly surpass the strength of tool steels.
Lastly, Earth's crust is rebounding post-glacially at the rate it is, because it is partly molten.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Second, the high density at the core means that the gravitational pull decreases slower from the surface and hence the average acceleration is higher and the pressure is higher, not lower. Each shell of a sphere pulls on something outside that shell as if all its mass were at the center.
- Continued -
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
And while the pressure is high, it is not enough for most rocks to change crystalline structure - that is usually ~10 GPa or so.
The rebounding crust is ~40 km thick, and while it gets close to melting at the bottom, the moon's core is estimated to be over 800C, or ~half-way to melting and thus close to the average crust temperature, therefore I felt that the rebound of the crust was a tolerable approximation.
However the rebound is flex on a length scale ~20x the crust thickness, which greatly overstates the flow, and the softening with temperature is exponential, so the top of the crust dominates rebound, which greatly understates the flow. These two factors might not cancel well, so I agreed that the rebound calculation is a crude.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Good points, though I'm still not convinced on the gravity vs. density balance: I still suspect the product of the two will yield a value less than the uniform-density model. But it's probably a matter of small coefficients rather than orders of magnitude.
Yep, I guess I'll have to cancel my plans to found a deep Moon-extraction consortium :-) I mean, apart from 800C temperatures at the core (which I didn't realize was the current estimate -- I thought it was much cooler), upon further reflection actually lifting stuff such a long way through such a gravitational well would probably use too much energy to make the whole enterprise cost-effective. Probably cheaper to mine smaller space rocks in the first place, even if they are that much farther and harder to get to and live on.
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Although people seem to regard NEOs as hazards, I see each one as 'a gift from the gods'. We should use Aphophis' 2029 near approach to give it a nudge that would prime it for capture in 2036. But rather than another encounter with the earth to adjust its orbit in 2036, I'd recommend nudging it to pass close to the moon. This might take more passes to capture it due to the moon's lower surface gravity, but it would be much safer since a miss would impact the moon rather than the earth.
A nudge at perihelion in 2029 would take surprisingly little energy to make a big change in its position in 2036.
Alternatively if humanity wants to practice first, we could steer Apophis to hit the moon in 2036 to remove the danger to earth. Hitting the near side would be pretty spectacular!
But I think that ~100,000 times the mass that humanity has put into orbit so far is too good a resource to pass up, so I say capture it.
Sep 09, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The same fuel used as an explosive below the surface would be much more effective due to kicking off far more mass. This would put it within the range of human's current capability, even without nuking it (which would be much harder to control and would leave the material less desirable).
(Or we could practice on a 30-meter NEO first).
Sep 09, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
My thinking, and I am not an expert in this, is that only propellant that escaped Apophis's gravity completely would shift its orbit. If it does not escape it would be like the cartoon of a sailor blowing into his ship's sails. Expended propellant that fell back onto Apophis would have no effect and be wasted.
So could the shuttle, or any rocket engine we have, overcome that hump?
Sep 09, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Sep 09, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
The escape velocity of Apophis is only ~0.5 km/h, or about 10% of walking speed.
Sep 09, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
http://en.wikiped...sulation
-Suitable asteroids in earth orbit could be hollowed out, pressurized, and inhabited, their bulk providing natural radiation protection. And they could be moved elsewhere.
Sep 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Come on dude, you're smarter than that.
The weight of atmosphere is insignificant compared to the weight of rocks after just about a FOOT below the surface...
In fact, in an earth based mine, the weight of the atmosphere even helps off-set some of the rock, because the air fills the caverns.
on the moon, there is no air-pressure, so you would have empty shafts of vaccuum under 1/6th gravity for walls of lunar regolith and rock. Sure, you could probably go 6 times as deep or so, or make a shaft 6 times wider due to the weak gravity, but that would depend strongly on local geology, faults, etc and mineralogy of the rocks you are digging in.
Moreover, we have almost no knowledge whatsoever of the moon's sub-surface geology regarding faults and mineralogy. It would probably take decades to do enough research to know an area is safe for large sub-surface mining operations.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Moreover, where the hell is the extinct star or an extinct, double-mass neutron star which should still be "somewhere" in the vicinity within a few light years of the Sun?
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
I expect this would make mining an asteroid pretty hard (though it would make 'exporting' the material rather easy)
Escape velocity is not equal to final velocity (escape velocity just means that you have enough kinetic energy to overcome the gravity well). But if you start off at JUST escape velocity then your speed after leaving the gravity well will be close to zero. No conservation laws need to be violated.
Sep 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
And the sun has traveled around the galaxy ~25 times since its birth, so its birth neighbors are not necessarily still current neighbors.
And while you are correct that the weight of the air is insignificant for deep mines, it is more than 'insignificant after about a foot'.
On earth the weight of the atmosphere is equivalent to ~34 feet of water. Rock is typically 3x denser than water (granite, for example, is ~2.7, and basalt 3.0). So the atmosphere weighs the same per area as ~10 feet of basalt or 12 feet of granite.