Cosmic coincidence
September 5, 2011 By Steve Nerlich, Universe Today
The standard model of the universe has it that the energy density of its contents and the 'dark energy' of its expansion are, just now, of the same order of magnitude. Coincidence? Credit: NASA.
Cosmologists tend not to get all that excited about the universe being 74% dark energy and 26% conventional energy and matter (albeit most of the matter is dark and mysterious as well). Instead they get excited about the fact that the density of dark energy is of the same order of magnitude as that more conventional remainder.
After all, it is quite conceivable that the density of dark energy might be ten, one hundred or even one thousand times more (or less) than the remainder. But nope, it seems its about three times as much which is less than ten and more than one, meaning that the two parts are of the same order of magnitude. And given the various uncertainties and error bars involved, you might even say the density of dark energy and of the more conventional remainder are roughly equivalent. This is what is known as the cosmic coincidence.
To a cosmologist, particularly a philosophically-inclined cosmologist, this coincidence is intriguing and raises all sorts of ideas about why it is so. However, Lineweaver and Egan suggest this is actually the natural experience of any intelligent beings/observers across the universe, since their evolution will always roughly align with the point in time at which the cosmic coincidence is achieved.
A current view of the universe describes its development through the following steps:
Inflationary era a huge whoomp of volume growth driven by something or other. This is a very quick era lasting from 10-35 to 10-32 of the first second after the Big Bang.
Radiation dominated era the universe continues expanding, but at a less furious rate. Its contents cools as their density declines. Hadrons begin to cool out from hot quark-gluon soup while dark matter forms out of whatever it forms out of all steadily adding matter to the universe, although radiation still dominates. This era lasts for maybe 50,000 years.
Matter dominated era this era begins when the density of matter exceeds the density of radiation and continues through to the release of the cosmic microwave background radiation at 380,000 years, when the first atoms formed and then continues on for a further 5 billion years. Throughout this era, the energy/matter density of the whole universe continues to gravitationally restrain the rate of expansion of the universe, even though expansion does continue.
Cosmological constant dominated era from 5 billion years to now (13.7 billion) and presumably for all of hereafter, the energy/matter density of the universe is so diluted that it begins losing its capacity to restrain the expansion of universe which hence accelerates. Empty voids of space grow ever larger between local clusters of gravitationally-concentrated matter.
And here we are. Lineweaver and Egan propose that it is unlikely that any intelligent life could have evolved in the universe much earlier than now (give or take a couple of billion years) since you need to progressively cycle through the star formation and destruction of Population III, II and then I stars to fill the universe with sufficient metals to allow planets with evolutionary ecosystems to develop.
The four eras of the universe mapped over a logarithmic time scale. Note that "Now" occurs as the decline in matter density and the acceleration in cosmic expansion cross over. Credit: Lineweaver and Egan.
So any intelligent observer in this universe is likely to find the same data which underlie the phenomenon we call the cosmological coincidence. Whether any aliens describe their finding as a coincidence may depend upon what mathematical model they have developed to formulate the cosmos. Its unlikely to be the same one we are currently running with full of baffling dark components, notably a mysterious energy that behaves nothing like energy.It might be enough for them to note that their observations have been taken at a time when the universes contents no longer have sufficient density to restrain the universes inherent tendency to expand and so it expands at a steadily increasing rate.
More information: Lineweaver and Egan. The Cosmic Coincidence as a Temporal Selection Effect Produced by the Age Distribution of Terrestrial Planets in the Universe (subsequently published in Astrophysical Journal 2007, Vol 671, 853.)
Source: Universe Today
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
32
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...

Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (11)
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
https://www.e-edu...hbig.gif
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
@nxtr - if the big crunch is true, then at some point yes, we will converge back into a singularity and re-expand (or go to infintesimal nothingness I suppose)
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
http://www.scienc...0830.htm
IMO from the same reason, like the ripples are collapsing with accelerated speed at the picture bellow.
http://www.pitt.e...ples.jpg
From aether theory follows, at the wavelength of CMBR the Universe doesn't expand and for waves of larger wavelength it will collapse instead. The water surface ripples are behaving in the same way.
http://www.aether...ples.jpg
This dependence makes the aether model testable. For example it has been observed, in CMBR radiation many effects of red shift disappear.
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
The remote galaxies appear larger, then the close ones. If our Universe would expand, the older galaxies should be smaller instead.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1011.4956
The astronomers still didn't observe the blue shift for radiowaves, particularly because of the lack of proper sources of reference wavelength. But the aether theory predict violation from inverse square law, too. In accordance with it it has been observed, the intensity of distant radiowave sources is 6x higher, than it corresponds their distance.
http://arcade.gsf...006.html
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
Hi nxtr, I think you are referring to the '80's theory of Big Bang/ Big Crunch.
https://secure.wi...g_Crunch
This cosmological model has fallen out of favor due to better understanding of our current universal expansion. Simply put there is not enough matter or gravity to elicit a Big Crunch.
I'm not a scientist but I am a 40 white guy who grew up on Big Bang/Big Crunch with Sagan. Any book by Brian Greene will bring you up to speed quickly and easily into this era.
Cheers
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
I know Smolin rejected his own theory, but I reject his rejection.
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (8)
From Wiki...
Douglas Adams used the metaphor of a living puddle examining its own shape, since, to those living creatures, the universe may appear to fit them perfectly (while in fact, they simply fit the universe perfectly).
To quote Penrose again: "it tends to be invoked by theorists whenever they do not have a good enough theory to explain the observed facts."
and this:
As such, they are criticized as an elaborate way of saying "if things were different, they would be different," which is a valid statement, but does not make a claim of some factual alternative over another.
Looks to me like someone needed to get an article published, and maybe hope for a book deal.
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
http://en.wikiped...r_matter
"Mirror particles have therefore been suggested as candidates for the inferred dark matter in the universe"
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Empty voids of space grow ever larger.
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Actually it does make a claim of one alternative over the other. The anthropic principle states:
We observe intelligent life - therefore the universe is capable of hosting intelligent life.
This does not put a limit on what other forms the universe could have (nor does it suppotr any claim that the universe MUST be a certain way so as to suppotr life or that it is even more likely to support life than not).
However it negates the notion that the universe cannot host life. I.e. there is an entire set of possibilities in search space (or as Penrose puts it 'phase space' ) which cannot be excluded. Whereas for the other types (some universes which don't support life) we don't know whether some of that search space can be excluded or not.
This is very little information but it is not no information.
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
We can not observe the bright stars of the sun's size issue and therefore we do not know about the distant galaxies contain the same types of star as our own Milky Way.
It is only the brightest starlight we observe from the most distant galaxies and that light comes mostly from young stars. Therefore, we normally come up to the conclusion that the most distant galaxies are young galaxies.
Our understanding of the universe from the most distant areas, is only based on information which is extremely small.
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
Observerd red-shift imbalance support tired-light models?
http://www.physor...nds.html
Forever increasing dark energy violates thermodynamic laws? Like in Texas, it's the LAW!
http://www.physor...ips.html
Sep 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I'm not comfortable with this. It's like saying a car is the same size as a bus because you measure them both in metres. If you expressed their sizes in binary, a truly universal counting system not based on the number of fingers the inventors possess, then the orders of magnitude (OOM) are not the same. I think up to double the quantity should qualify as same OOM but any more than that should not.
Sep 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet