College athletes worth six figures, live below federal poverty line

Sep 14, 2011

Perhaps the upcoming football game between Ohio State and Miami is the most fitting backdrop to the results of a National College Players Association (NCPA) and Drexel University Department of Sport Management joint study, which blames colleges sports scandals on a black market created by unethical and unpractical NCAA restrictions on college athletes.  Examining football and basketball teams from Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) colleges, the study calculates athletes' out-of-pocket educational related expenses associated with a "full" scholarship, compares the room and board portion of players' scholarships to the federal poverty line and coaches' and athletic administrators' salaries, and uses NFL and NBA collective bargaining agreements to estimate the fair market value of FBS football and basketball players.

The study, entitled "The Price of Poverty in Big Time Sport," shows that the average scholarship shortfall (out-of-pocket expenses) for each "full" scholarship athlete was approximately $3,222 per player during the 2010-11 school year.  The report also found that the room and board provisions in a full scholarship leave 85% of living on campus and 86% of players living off campus living below the federal poverty line.  The study estimates the fair market value of the average FBS football and basketball player to be $120,048 and $265,027, respectively.  

"We all know that big time football and basketball players receive much less than they are worth, but the disparity between players' fair market value, what they receive, and the money that others receive is shocking," stated NCPA President and study co-author Ramogi Huma.

The top paid 60 FBS football coaches averaged more than $2 million in total compensation with Alabama's Nick Saban and Texas' Mack Brown earning approximately $6 million and $5.1 million, respectively.  The top 25 highest paid basketball coaches whose team played in the 2011 NCAA tournament averaged about $2.4 million with Louisville's Rick Pitino earning $7.5 million in total compensation.

According to the study, University of Texas football players' fair market value was $513,922 in 2010 but they lived $778 below the federal poverty line and had a $3,624 scholarship shortfall.  Duke basketball players were valued at $1,025,656 while living just $732 above the poverty line and a scholarship shortfall of $1,995.  The University of Florida had the highest combined football and basketball revenues while its football and basketball players' scholarships left them living $2,250 below the federal poverty line and a $3,190 scholarship shortfall.

In former Florida football star Tim Tebow's recently released autobiography entitled "Through My Eyes," Tebow reveals his frustration with the NCAA.  He writes, "The NCAA's stance on paying players – or not paying them – seems unfair to me, with the preposterous amounts of money being made by the schools, television, coaches, and the like.  And the players?"

According to Drexel University professor Dr. Ellen J. Staurowsky, co-author of the study, "Our findings continue to unmask the pretense that big-time college sport is about 'kids' playing 'games.'  Big-time college sport is about big business.  The mythology of the 'student-athlete' as promoted by the NCAA is revealed to cover up a system of inequities in compensation and treatment for the athletes who make the most sacrifices and contribute the most to the enterprise. Public policy makers, higher education officials, and athletes themselves have an opportunity in light of recent events to call for and implement reforms that will eliminate the exploitative college sport practices that bring no credit to higher education and have caused considerable pain and hardship to athletes over the years."

Backed by the findings in the study and an Inside Higher Education report showing that almost half of FBS colleges were caught violating NCAA rules between 2001-10, the report implicates the NCAA as the entity primarily responsible for the scandals that have plagued college sports.  The report says, "Through the NCAA, college presidents mandate impoverished conditions for young, valuable players and throw money around to all other college sports stakeholders when those players perform well, a formula that drives the powerful black market that thrives at so many universities nationwide."  

The report also points out that, despite athletic programs' record revenues, salaries, and capital expenditures as well as prohibitions on countless sources of income for athletes, the NCAA explicitly allows taxpayers to fund food stamps and welfare benefits for .  Huma stated, "The NCAA is forcing taxpayers to pay for expenses that players would be able to pay themselves if not for NCAA rules.  I guess the NCAA expects both college athletes and taxpayers to finance its greed and lavish salaries."

The report also examines options to bring forth reform and points out that college presidents, the group of individuals that control the NCAA, have admitted that while they want to reform college sports, they lack the power to do so.  After interviewing 95 of the 120 FBS college presidents in 2009, The Knight Commission reported, "In sum, presidents would like serious change but don't see themselves as the force for the changes needed, nor have they identified an alternative force they believe could be effective."

Huma stated, "With FBS college presidents admitting failure and their lack of ability to initiate comprehensive reform, only the federal government has the power to reform big time college sports."

The joint report recommends that the U.S. Department of Justice and Congress act to bring forth comprehensive reform through NCAA deregulation and more educational support for college athletes including:

• Alleviating some of the athletes' financial desperation by using new TV revenues to provide athletic scholarships that fully cover each school's cost of attendance.
• Adopt the Olympic amateur model by lifting restrictions on college athletes' commercial opportunities such as endorsements and autograph signings.   A portion of the funds could be placed in an educational lockbox (described below) to help increase graduation rates and decrease NCAA violations.
• Allow revenue-producing athletes to receive a portion of new revenues that can be placed in an educational lockbox, a trust fund to be accessed to assist in or upon the completion of their college degree.  Players who violate rules could lose some or all of their portion from this fund.

"The NCAA's version of amateurism is not only unjust, it is impossible to maintain without guaranteeing more embarrassing and costly scandals.  We need a new model and it should incorporate our recommendations," stated Huma.

The NCPA plans to take its efforts to reform college to Washington, D.C.  It is launching a Twitter account today to keep the public informed of its efforts with the federal government as well as other issues involving college athletes' rights: http://twitter.com/NCPANOW .

Explore further: Precarious work schedules common among younger workers

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study asks how safe is high school football?

Aug 15, 2007

Football, one of the most popular sports in the United States, is also the leading cause of sports-related injuries. During the 2005-06 season, high school football players sustained more than half a million ...

Sports machismo may be cue to male teen violence

Jan 23, 2008

The sports culture surrounding football and wrestling may be fueling aggressive and violent behavior not only among teen male players but also among their male friends and peers on and off the field, according to a Penn State ...

Recommended for you

Precarious work schedules common among younger workers

Aug 29, 2014

One wish many workers may have this Labor Day is for more control and predictability of their work schedules. A new report finds that unpredictability is widespread in many workers' schedules—one reason ...

Girls got game

Aug 29, 2014

Debi Taylor has worked in everything from construction development to IT, and is well and truly socialised into male-dominated workplaces. So when she found herself the only female in her game development ...

Computer games give a boost to English

Aug 28, 2014

If you want to make a mark in the world of computer games you had better have a good English vocabulary. It has now also been scientifically proven that someone who is good at computer games has a larger ...

Saddam Hussein—a sincere dictator?

Aug 28, 2014

Are political speeches manipulative and strategic? They could be – when politicians say one thing in public, and privately believe something else, political scientists say. Saddam Hussein's legacy of recording private discussions ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Nanobanano
not rated yet Sep 14, 2011
Do you realize how much more college tuition would go up for non-atheletes if they paid all of the basketball and football players, both men and women in basketball, these alleged "fair market values"?

this isn't a fair market value anyway.

Football players absolutely are NOT worth as much as doctors and engineers, period.

But if you paid all 60-something people on a football team 500k, and paid both the mens and womens basketball players, that would increase the tuition at a university by a couple thousand dollars per person per year.

What about non-atheletes who work too, and live in poverty, and they can't get a scholarship to go to school to LEARN, but a football player can get a full scholarship to go to school and major in "general studies" (i.e. high school repeat,) or Kinesiology, and we can bet they get FREE TUTORS too...the rare student athelete dentist or doctor like Matt Mauk is exceptional.
Nanobanano
not rated yet Sep 14, 2011
Alternatively, the universities could increase the ticket price for a football game by $25 per ticket in order to make enough money in 12 games to pay the players 500k...

But wow, just wow.

What sort of irrational, insane planet do we live on when someone seriously wants to start paying college atheletes 11 times the national mean average income?

Not only do college atheletes NOT need to be paid, and certainly not anywhere near that much, but professional atheletes need significant millionaires taxes applied.

Even $1000 per game would be outrageous.

This entire country has totally lost it's mind.