With cheap Pandigital tablet, you get what you pay for

Sep 02, 2011 By Troy Wolverton
With cheap Pandigital tablet, you get what you pay for

Electronics manufacturers have had a tough time competing against Apple's iPad.

They've tried copying the iPad's physical design, revamping the operating systems underlying their machines, and offering things the doesn't have, such as memory slots and extra ports. But none of the iPad's rivals has come close to threatening the Apple device's dominance.

One challenge these tablets face is price; many have been offered at the same price as the iPad. And consumers have overwhelmingly decided that if they are going to spend $500 or more for a tablet, they might as well get the iPad, not some knockoff.

But there's reason to believe consumers might be interested in alternative tablets priced significantly less than the iPad. Hewlett-Packard's TouchPad sold poorly when it carried the same price as Apple's device and even when it was discounted by $100. But when HP dropped the price down to $100 for the base TouchPad, it sold like hot cakes.

Other manufacturers are also trying to beat the iPad on price. Earlier this month, Pandigital, a Dublin-based maker of low-cost digital photo frames and

other electronics goods, introduced a new line of tablets based on Google's that cost less than $190 each.

I've been testing out one of these tablets, the Pandigital Nova, to get a sense of what can expect. I wasn't impressed. With this tablet, you get what you pay for.

No one would confuse the Nova with the iPad. It's smaller, with a screen that measures 7 inches on the diagonal, rather than nearly 10. The Nova's case is made of cheap-feeling plastic, rather than the glass and aluminum of the iPad. Instead of single home button, the Pandigital device has four physical buttons on its face, set in a row. And rather than a display that's flush with its case, the Nova's screen is set within the case, leaving a ridge around the edges.

None of those features are necessarily game-stoppers. I generally liked the 7-inch screen on RIM's PlayBook tablet, and my favorite Android tablet to date, Samsung's Galaxy Tab 10.1, also has a plastic case. For those unfamiliar with the device, the buttons can be more intuitive than the gestures used to control the PlayBook or HP's TouchPad. And there are plenty of other devices with screens that aren't flush with the case.

But the Nova comes up short when compared to the iPad - and even other Android tablets - in plenty of other ways.

The device feels slow. When opening up the application folder, launching an app, turning pages in an e-book or going back to the home page, the Nova feels sluggish, not instantaneous.

It also feels cheap. The buttons are flimsy and aren't always responsive. On numerous occasions, I had to press the home button repeatedly to get it to respond.

I had a similar experience with the Nova's touch screen. I often had to swipe several times to scroll through the list of applications or switch between home screens. And "Angry Birds" was barely playable because the device frequently wouldn't recognize when I was trying to load or aim the birds in their slingshot. Instead, the slingshot would either misfire or would get stuck at a certain angle that it wouldn't let me alter.

Although the Nova is built on Android, you won't get the same Android experience you would on other recent tablets. Instead of the Honeycomb version, which Google designed specifically with tablets in mind, the Nova runs Android 2.3, an older version designed for smartphones. That's not a big shortcoming, though, because that version of Android actually works fine on a 7-inch screen like the Nova's.

More of a problem is that Pandigital didn't use the Google-flavored version of Android. The Nova doesn't have any of Google's apps preinstalled. It also doesn't have a link to the App Marketplace that Google runs, so there's no way to download those apps. However, Pandigital says it's working with Google to add a link to the App Marketplace.

Instead, the Nova has a link to an app store run by GetJar. You can also install a link to Amazon.com's Appstore. Both vendors offer a decent number of Android applications. I was able to download "Angry Birds," Amazon's Kindle e-book reader and Amazon's MP3 player and store app. But I was frustrated that the device didn't have the standard Gmail application that comes on other Android devices and that I couldn't install Latitude or other Google apps.

And I ran into another problem with apps. The Nova has 4-gigabytes of internal storage. That's not a lot, but you can use it to store apps you download from GetJar. You can't, however, use it to store apps - or music - you download from Amazon. Instead, you'll have to buy a memory card to plug into the tablet.

I was able to find a 16-gigabyte microSD flash card at Fry's for $30, and you can find one for less online. But the added cost means that the Nova's $190 price is a bit deceptive; you'll need to spend more than $200 total to have a device with a decent amount of storage.

To be fair, Pandigital isn't trying to re-create the iPad with the Nova. There's no way it could offer an even remotely comparable device for $300 less than the iPad.

Still, the Nova is disappointing. Instead of being a bargain, it just feels cheap.

PANDIGITAL NOVA TABLET COMPUTER

-Likes: Low price, small shape

-Dislikes: Cheap-feeling case; low-quality touch screen and buttons; inadequate built-in storage requires add-on memory card; no access to Google's app store or apps

-Specs: 800-megahertz single-core processor; VGA front- and 1.3-megapixel rear-facing cameras; 4-gigabytes flash storage; 7-inch touch screen; Android version 2.3.

-How much: $190

-Web: pandigital.com

Explore further: Nokia recalls 30,000 chargers for Lumia 2520 tablet

More information: Troy Wolverton is a technology columnist for the San Jose Mercury News.

2.2 /5 (6 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Samsung's new Galaxy Tab has much to like

May 26, 2011

When it comes to tablets, Apple's iPad so dominates the market that some analysts have wondered whether consumers will have an appetite for any other device.

Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab vs. Apple iPad

Nov 19, 2010

More than eight months after the release of the Apple iPad, fans of Google's Android mobile operating system finally have a contender in the race for tablet supremacy.

Recommended for you

Sony's PlayStation 4 sales top seven million

18 hours ago

Sony says it has sold seven million PlayStation 4 worldwide since its launch last year and admitted it can't make them fast enough, in a welcome change of fortune for the Japanese consumer electronics giant.

Study: Samsung phone durable, but iPhone has edge

Apr 14, 2014

Samsung's new Galaxy S5 smartphone is more durable than last year's model and other leading Android phones, but the iPhone 5s outperformed all of them in part because of its smaller size, a new study finds.

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

krundoloss
not rated yet Sep 02, 2011
Yeah, if you want a tablet either buy an iPad or wait until the world catches up to Apple and their technology. How does Apple do it?
krundoloss
not rated yet Sep 02, 2011
I have a Pandigital and yes, it is sluggish and disappointing. My Nephews want to play with it but I tell them it is a waste of thier time. They will get frustrated and put it down within 1 minute. This is not the 90's, no one will tolerate slow technology anymore.
dirk_bruere
not rated yet Sep 02, 2011
Any Android Tablet not running Honeycomb is a waste of time and money.
Eikka
3.4 / 5 (5) Sep 02, 2011
The main point is, that tablet computers never had much use outside of very special cases. People don't know why they would need one, but if it costs $100 then why not?

Apple fans on the other hand will buy anything with the logo, as long as it gives them that fuzzy feeling of whatever image the company is trying to push.
Zzoni
5 / 5 (2) Sep 02, 2011
When Apple announced the iPad2 they had already sold 15 million iPads in 2010. They sold 2 million iPad2's in the first 60 days. All those iPads to "Apple Fans". They're such suckers, right? Go to an Apple store and see WHY they are selling like nuts. Might it be the 90,000 apps available for them?
Eikka
not rated yet Sep 02, 2011
Any Android Tablet not running Honeycomb is a waste of time and money.


Any computer, tablet, laptop, handheld or whatever, is a waste of time if it doesn't run exactly the operating system that the user needs it to.

I for example don't want Android or iOS, but I could buy a tablet that runs what I'm familiar with, that I actually use, and if it costs little enough that I can justify buying another computer I might use once every blue moon.
rwinners
5 / 5 (3) Sep 02, 2011
fluffy. all of it. I can do a zillion times more work and have more fun on this 3 year old laptop. Why would I pay 500 for something, ANYTHING!, that offers less? It seems that the recession has a ways to go.
rwinners
not rated yet Sep 02, 2011
When Apple announced the iPad2 they had already sold 15 million iPads in 2010. They sold 2 million iPad2's in the first 60 days. All those iPads to "Apple Fans". They're such suckers, right? Go to an Apple store and see WHY they are selling like nuts. Might it be the 90,000 apps available for them?


90K apps that do what?? I mean in the world of productivity.

Zzoni
4 / 5 (2) Sep 03, 2011
I can't believe I'm going to bat for Apple. 90K apps, you have to admit, is a significant selling feature. As an engineer, I can also see (feel, hear) when something is expertly designed and produced -- that's the hardware. As for the apps, they too are expertly done. Not Angry Birds, but programs like Emerald Observatory. Out of the 90K apps, if only 1 in 10 is worth it, that's still significant. Pick 10 from the 10K "really good" ones. Expert marketing and support help too.
sherriffwoody
1 / 5 (1) Sep 03, 2011
I paid 100 NZD for an andriod tablet and its great. It does exactly what I need it to, has access to over 50,000 apps - though how many do you really need. Near 10 hours battery life etc etc. 100 bucks vs over 1k for an iPad, I know which I'll choose. Just because it doesn't have a half eaten devils apple on it I get a 900 odd dollar saving and I'm not contributing to steve jobs health bills, deaths in his factories, his pollluting factories and his apple religion. Wish someone would bring out some more an alternate linux tab OS.

More news stories

Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers

(Phys.org) —Four freshmen at the University of Pennsylvania have taken Apple's personal assistant Siri to behave as a graduate-level executive assistant which, when asked, is capable of adjusting the temperature ...

Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur

Sulfur left over from refining fossil fuels can be transformed into cheap, lightweight, plastic lenses for infrared devices, including night-vision goggles, a University of Arizona-led international team ...

Deadly human pathogen Cryptococcus fully sequenced

Within each strand of DNA lies the blueprint for building an organism, along with the keys to its evolution and survival. These genetic instructions can give valuable insight into why pathogens like Cryptococcus ne ...