British group unveils facial reading lie-detector

September 14, 2011 by Bob Yirka report

(PhysOrg.com) -- A British team of researchers led by Professor Hassan Ugail of Bradford University have demonstrated a new type of lie-detector at the annual British Science Festival in Bradford. Instead of hooking people up to wires and pressure cuffs, the new system measures heat given off around the eyes and subtle facial movements that are then analyzed using a special algorithm. Ugail claims that the, as yet unnamed system, has been shown to be around 70% accurate when testing volunteers.

The new system records subtle clues that people give off when lying, such as increased around the eyes, tiny or nose twitching. All of these bits of information are then fed into the computer which uses an algorithm based on the work of Paul Ekman and Walter Friesen, to give an educated guess as to whether the person being analyzed is lying.

One of the major selling points of such technology would be its use in situations where the person being targeted doesn’t know they are being tested, something that traditional polygraph lie-detectors can’t do. Because the research has been backed by the UKs Border Agency, the technology will most likely be used to screen passengers at airports, and in fact, the team is currently working with government and security officials to begin testing at an unspecified UK airport in the near future.

Because the tests were done with volunteers who not only knew they were being tested, but were asked to lie when answering mundane questions, Ugail believes the system will prove to be far more accurate when used in real life situations. But he also believes that as more research is done and more variables are added to the , that the system will one day prove to be as reliable as current lie-detectors, which experts believe are about 90% accurate.

Ugail also acknowledges that no can be 100% accurate as none of them actually detect lying; instead they rely on cues to make educated guesses. Though he adds that the more tools law enforcement has at its disposal, the better chance they will have of catching those with ill intent.

If the new system proves to be as reliable as Ugail hopes, it might make us all safer, but it might also lead to other less noble purposes, such as employers using it in job interviews or by news people in real-time interviews, which some might construe as an invasion of privacy.

© 2011 PhysOrg.com

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Nikola
Sep 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Wonder what happens if you continuously twitch your face, blink, and other sorts while being questioned? Or if you strain really hard to make blood go to your face? The machine probably would not know what the hell was going on. That would be amusing.
OdieNewton
Sep 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
^ Interesting loophole, but then the interrogator will most likely just assume that you have something to hide.
stealthc
Sep 14, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
good now the system can have absolute proof of their evils in a meeting while I go under the scrutiny of one of these machines. I think the system should publicly ask everyone what their beef is. I think the system should also subject prominent business owners to these machines, but most of all, we should be hooking our politicians to these boxes immediately so we can straighten this planet out.
Msean1941
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"current lie-detectors, which experts believe are about 90% accurate"

Really? I was under the impression that for an innocent person today's "lie detectors" are wrong 40% of the time which is one of the reasons they are not admissible in court. Scientific American had an article many years ago showing that guilty persons would fare better by volunteering to take the test because the margin of error is great enough to possibly exonerate them. By the same token the innocent should avoid them.
dogbert
Sep 15, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Msean1941,

Yes, no lie detector test is 90% accurate.

And the results of any such test are ineffective against psychopaths who lie without emotional response.

But facial analysis has good potential for screening, particularly in screening for terrorist activities. More effective, I would expect, from trained observers than from machine analysis.
rsklyar
Sep 18, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
It should be tested at Northwestern University: issuu.com/r_sklyar/docs/sklyarvsmussaivaldi
Rank 1 /5 (1 vote)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Technology / Software

created 6 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 2

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (22) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 13 | with audio podcast report

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (11) | comments 18


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...