Brightest gamma ray on Earth -- for a safer, healthier world

September 19, 2011

Brightest gamma ray on Earth -- for a safer, healthier world

Enlarge

This is professor Dino Jaroszynski of the University of Strathclyde. Credit: University of Strathclyde

The brightest gamma ray beam ever created- more than a thousand billion times more brilliant than the sun- has been produced in research led at the University of Strathclyde- and could open up new possibilities for medicine.

Physicists have discovered that ultra-short duration can interact with ionised gas to give off beams that are so intense they can pass through 20 cm of lead and would take 1.5 m of concrete to be completely absorbed.

The ray could have several uses, such as in , and radioisotope production for PET (positron ) scanning. The source could also be useful in monitoring the integrity of stored .

In addition, the laser pulses are short enough- lasting a quadrillionth of a second- to capture the response of a nucleus to stimuli, making the rays ideal for use in lab-based study of the .

The device used in the research is smaller and less costly than more conventional sources of gamma rays, which are a form of X-rays.

The experiments were carried out on the Gemini laser in the Central Laser Facility at the Science and Technology Facilities Council's Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Strathclyde was also joined in the research by University of Glasgow and Instituto Superior Técnico in Lisbon.

Professor Dino Jaroszynski of Strathclyde, who led the research, said: "This is a great breakthrough, which could make the probing of very dense matter easier and more extensive, and so allow us to monitor nuclear fusion capsules imploding.

"To prove this we have imaged very thin wires - 25 microns thick - with gamma rays and produced very clear images using a new method called phase-contrast imaging. This allows very weakly absorbing material to be clearly imaged. Matter illuminated by gamma rays only cast a very weak shadow and therefore are invisible. Phase-contrast imaging is the only way to render these transparent objects visible.

"It could also act as a powerful tool in medicine for cancer therapy and there is nothing else to match the duration of the gamma ray pulses, which is also why it is so bright.

"In nature, if you accelerate charged particles, such as electrons, they radiate. We trapped particles in a cavity of ions trailing an intense laser pulse and accelerated these to high energies. Electrons in this cavity also interact with the laser and pick up energy from it and oscillate wildly - much like a child being pushed on a swing. The large swinging motion and the high energy of the electrons allow a huge increase in the photon energy to produce gamma rays. This enabled the gamma ray photons to outshine any other earthbound source.

"The accelerator we use is a new type called a laser-plasma wakefield accelerator which uses high power lasers and ionised gas to accelerate charged particles to very high energies - thus shrinking a conventional accelerator, which is 100m long, to one which fits in the palm of your hand."

The peak brilliance of the was measured to be greater than 1023 photons per second, per square milliradian, per square millimetre, per 0.1% bandwidth.

The research was supported by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Science and Technology Facilities Council, the Laserlab-Europe Consortium and the Extreme Light Infrastructure project. It is linked to SCAPA (Scottish Centre for the Application of Plasma-based Accelerators), which is based at Strathclyde and is run through the Scottish Universities Physics Alliance.

The research has been published in the journal Nature Physics.

Provided by University of Strathclyde

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

HyperAnomaly
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: 3.5 / 5 (8)
"The device used in the research is smaller and less costly than more conventional sources of gamma rays, which are a form of X-rays."

Gamma rays are not a form of x-rays. Gamma rays and x-rays are different by definition; gammas are produced by nuclear energy changes whereas x-rays are created by electronic energy changes.
Mahal_Kita
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
So.. Let's launch one in outer space and make it pulse in all directions. "Hey! Here we are. We need some assitance cleaning up the mess we made of our planet!" Or.. Something similar :-)
antialias_physorg
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (13)
Gamma rays are not a form of x-rays. Gamma rays and x-rays are different by definition; gammas are produced by nuclear energy changes whereas x-rays are created by electronic energy changes.

Both are photons - only the energies differ (gamma ray frequencies starting at about two orders of magnitude higher than x-rays).
How they are produced is not reflected in the naming scheme (other than historically). There are many mechanisms that can create x-rays or gamma rays (or both)
JRDarby
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
"A thousand billion" -- oh, you mean a "trillion"?
tigger
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
"The British define a trillion as tri-million or three "million" written side by side and meaning a million million million or 1 x 10 to the 18th power." - Source: http://www.wonder...ions.htm

Silverhill
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (4)
And the British define a billion as one million millions, so we're left wondering whether the radiation is 10^12 or 10^15 "times more brilliant than the sun".

(Also, the proper phrasing is "n times *as* brilliant", not "*more* brilliant"....)
JRDarby
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"The British define a trillion as tri-million or three "million" written side by side and meaning a million million million or 1 x 10 to the 18th power." - Source: http://www.wonder...ions.htm



Interesting; thanks.
Decimatus
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Raise your hand if you would like to be "medically imaged" by the brightest gamma ray on earth.
holoman
Sep 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Old News.

The technology talking about has patent filed by an
American in 2008.
Cave_Man
Sep 20, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Gamma rays are not a form of x-rays. Gamma rays and x-rays are different by definition; gammas are produced by nuclear energy changes whereas x-rays are created by electronic energy changes.

Both are photons - only the energies differ (gamma ray frequencies starting at about two orders of magnitude higher than x-rays).
How they are produced is not reflected in the naming scheme (other than historically). There are many mechanisms that can create x-rays or gamma rays (or both)


And in 100k years there will be aliens showing up on our doorstep to slaughter us only to find that they are a little late to the party.
HyperAnomaly
Sep 20, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
@antialias,

Yes, gammas and x-rays are both photons, and yes most physics textbooks oversimplify them as simply being different photon energies in a continuum. However, they are *defined* differently based on the method of their production, although you cannot tell the difference of one from the other once they are detected a priori. If you look into any medical physics or nuclear engineering textbook you will see this strongly emphasized. Even the mighty wikipedia agrees: "gamma rays are now usually distinguished by their origin: X-rays are emitted by definition by electrons outside the nucleus, while gamma rays are emitted by the nucleus."
Fionn
Sep 20, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Has anyone considered the military applications for this? The thing is a directional, precise, high-powered blast of ionizing radiation! It could act like a directional, explosion-free neutron bomb, delivering enemy combatants fatal doses of radiation in seconds without destroying farmland and infrastructure! It could short out computers, government, military, and civilian, disrupting vital services and infrastructure. It could even disable incoming missiles!
antialias_physorg
Sep 21, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
If you look into any medical physics or nuclear engineering textbook you will see this strongly emphasized.

If you go to astronomy then the distinction is merely by energy (there are a number of satellites that specifically look at the x-ray pert of the spectrum of the sky). Any radiation source hot enough produces x-rays (among other energies).

Has anyone considered the military applications for this?

It's a bit big for that, short range, limited in direction, and uses oodels of power.

Rank 5 /5 (9 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Water flow question
    created1 hour ago
  • [Drift velocity] Factors affecting velocity
    created4 hours ago
  • does cold gasoline have less energy
    created4 hours ago
  • distribution of molecules throughout the atmosphere
    created6 hours ago
  • The Global Positioning System !
    created7 hours ago
  • A Question relating Power
    created8 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (17) | comments 42 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (22) | comments 48 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 15 | with audio podcast

Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots

(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of “robots” as a laser ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2 | with audio podcast weblog

Sound increases the efficiency of boiling

Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...

Physics / Soft Matter

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2


Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...