Black-white marriages increased rapidly since 1980, study finds

Sep 15, 2011

A new study of interracial marriages in the United States since the 1980s suggests that the racial boundary between blacks and whites continues to break down – but is not yet close to disappearing.

Marriages between African Americans and whites increased rapidly between 1980 and 2008, outpacing the rate of unions between whites and other ethnic and racial groups, including Latinos, Asian Americans and American Indians.

Still, the total number of marriages between blacks and whites continues to be much smaller than those between whites and other racial and ethnic groups.

"The number of marriages between whites and African Americans is undeniably increasing rapidly, but it is still a small number," said Zhenchao Qian, lead author of the study and professor of sociology at Ohio State University.

In 1980, only 5 percent of black men married a white woman, but that increased to 14 percent in 2008. Still, by comparison, 38 percent of Asian American men and Hispanic men married a white woman in 2008.

"Our results point to better race relations in 2008 than 1980, but we still have a way to go," Qian said. "The racial boundary is blurred, but it is still there."

Qian conducted the study with Daniel Lichter, professor of policy analysis and management and sociology at Cornell University. Their results appear in the October 2011 issue of the Journal of Marriage and Family.

One of the strengths of this new study is that it uses data on new marriages begun each year between 1980 and 2008. That allows the researchers to see how marriages are reacting to current social conditions, according to Qian. Most studies use data on all marriages – including couples who married decades ago, when their marriage market was very different from that of today.

The study uses data from the 2008 American Community Survey, which is an ongoing survey of American households conducted by the U.S. Census Bureau. The survey includes about 3 million people a year. The researchers also use data from the 1980 U.S. census.

Understanding changes in interracial marriages is complex because it involves two different factors: the marriage market of who is available to marry and also individuals' choices about who they would be willing to marry.

Those two factors tell somewhat different stories, Qian said.

Overall, while marriages between blacks and whites showed large increases between 1980 and 2008, there was only a slight increase in marriages between whites and Hispanics. This period also marked the end of the long-term rise in marriages between whites and Asians.

Much of this can be explained by large increases in immigration of Hispanics and Asians into the United States, the study revealed.

This has meant that Hispanics and Asians living in the United States now have a larger pool of potential marriage partners from their own racial and ethnic groups. Indeed, results showed that marriages between U.S. born and foreign born Asians and Hispanics increased rapidly between 2000 and 2008.

"With the enormous growth of the immigrant population, Asians and Hispanics now have more opportunities than ever to find a marital partner who shares the same cultural background. Such marriages reinforce their cultural identity," Lichter said.

However, when the researchers calculated what would have happened if the size and characteristics of minority populations hadn't changed between 1980 and 2008, they found intermarriage rates would have actually increased rather than decreased or stayed the same.

"That suggests that any evidence of a retreat from interracial marriages is mostly a reflection of changing marital market opportunities, rather than changes in whom people are willing to marry," Lichter said.

But Lichter noted that the experience of blacks living in the United States was different from that of Latinos and Asians.

"There wasn't a great increase in black immigrants into the United States, so the rise in black-white intermarriages really suggests greater racial tolerance and a new openness to marrying outside one's own race. This suggests a weakening of the racial boundaries."

One noticeable change was the role of education in interracial marriages. For many years, highly educated Hispanics and Asian Americans have been more likely than their less educated counterparts to marry whites. But that was never true for blacks.

"It used to be that race trumped everything, including education, when it came to marriage between blacks and whites," Qian said.

"But that is changing. For the first time, we found that highly educated blacks and whites were more likely to intermarry. That is very significant and is another sign that racial boundaries are blurring."

The study also examined trends in biracial and cohabiting Americans.

The study found that people who classified themselves as white-Asian or white-American Indian were more likely to marry whites than Asians or American Indians.

"The rise in America's multiracial population blurs racial boundaries," Lichter said.

However, black-white biracial people are still more likely to marry blacks than whites.

In general, the results were similar in cohabiting couples as they were in married couples. However, interracial couples were slightly more likely to be in cohabiting unions than they were to be married, according to the findings.

Qian said the study suggests that, when it comes to marriage, "ethnic and racial boundaries are being crossed, especially among men and women with college education."

But the increasing immigrant population also means that many minorities in the United States, particularly Asian Americans and Hispanics, will have a greater opportunity than ever to marry within their ethnic or racial groups, he said.

Explore further: Change 'authoritarian' football culture to produce future stars, says research

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Where Hispanics live in the US may change over time

Oct 17, 2008

A study of residential patterns in America suggests that White and Black Hispanics born in the U.S. are more likely to share neighborhoods with native non-Hispanic Whites and African Americans, compared to foreign-born Hispanics ...

Recommended for you

Male-biased tweeting

16 hours ago

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

Developing nations ride a motorcycle boom

18 hours ago

Asia's rapidly developing economies should prepare for a full-throttle increase in motorcycle numbers as average incomes increase, a new study from The Australian National University has found.

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

210
5 / 5 (1) Sep 15, 2011
Indeed: And, D children from interracial marriages R often so very attractive. One can supremely hope all taboo against such marriage will end. The color of ones skin simply cannot & is not an indicator of just how noble or base D person wearing the skin is or will be. If the person who pulls me from a burning car or cures all forms of cancer is of a mixed heritage/race, my gratitude would still be overflowing and filled with praise. If my son or daughter marries someone who is willing 2 love them and risk their life for my kid, just as I would do, they are SWHEET and divine in my house!
A person of another color, skin color, a color they could NOT have chosen, wants 2 defend our nation, protect our borders, hire my children, guard D wellbeing of my wife, her friends, my neighbours, hell, THAT is what makes D nation worth saving & earns my trust/vote/tax dollars!
Heck, just how happy R U going 2 B if D person who robs yur house has D same skin color as you?
word-to-ya-muthas
Mandan
5 / 5 (3) Sep 16, 2011
Now, if the current leadership of the so-called Civil Rights movement (Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, etc.) and the black middle class would vociferously join the likes of Bill Cosby and begin active condemnation of the culture of criminality which has taken over popular black culture (hip hop/rap, gangsterism, "don't snitch" codes, irresponsible parenting, etc, etc.) as being at least as big a part of the obstacle facing blacks in America as the vestiges of white racism do, then perhaps some real progress towards stamping out the remaining white racist attitudes could begin to be made.

Unfortunately, even Cornell West has come under fire for merely criticizing Obama's lack of political will to take on the Republicans, with protesters greeting his public appearances around the country. Until the black community admits that the "quality of one's character" (MLK) is of the utmost importance, skin color will continue to evoke negative stereotypes in the minds of ignorant people.
ryggesogn2
2.3 / 5 (3) Sep 16, 2011
""The rise in America's multiracial population blurs racial boundaries," Lichter said"
What will the race baiting 'progressives' do now?
Vendicar_Decarian
3 / 5 (2) Sep 24, 2011
Your TeaPublican brothers seem very concerned that Obama is black.

Why is that RyggTard?
ryggesogn2
not rated yet Sep 24, 2011
"Herman Cain wins CPAC Florida straw poll"
http://www.washin...aw-poll/

""I have been speaking to Tea Parties, Americans for Prosperity, since 2009, before it was cool," Cain said, before pointing to victories in recent straw polls. "...If the Tea Party organization is racist, why does the black guy keep winning all these straw polls?" "
http://www.cbsnew...544.html

More news stories

Male-biased tweeting

Today women take an active part in public life. Without a doubt, they also converse with other women. In fact, they even talk to each other about other things besides men. As banal as it sounds, this is far ...

Not just the poor live hand-to-mouth

When the economy hits the skids, government stimulus checks to the poor sometimes follow. Stimulus programs—such as those in 2001, 2008 and 2009—are designed to boost the economy quickly by getting cash ...

Archaeologists, tribe clash over Native remains

Archaeologists and Native Americans are clashing over Indian remains and artifacts that were excavated during a construction project in the San Francisco Bay Area, but then reburied at an undisclosed location.