Review: Can a smartphone camera do it all?

Aug 10, 2011 By RACHEL METZ , AP Technology Writer
An Associated Press reporter demonstrates the camera on the HTC myTouch 4G Slide smartphone from T-Mobile during a product review in San Francisco, Wednesday, Aug. 10, 2011. (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)

If you're anything like me, your cellphone and its built-in camera is always on you, while your digital camera gathers dust at home.

This wasn't always the case. Just a few years ago, phone cameras with a lowly 1.3 megapixels were the norm, and photos came out pixelated and poorly lit. No way would you have thought of ditching your regular camera for one of those.

But as smartphone makers have increasingly realized the potential of the built-in camera, there's been a deluge of phones with cameras that can match - and sometimes outperform - low-end dedicated devices in a snap.

A new entrant to the market should inspire some more competition in the phone camera sphere: The myTouch 4G Slide smartphone, made by HTC and available through T-Mobile.

It has an 8-megapixel camera and plenty of the settings you'd find on a normal digital camera. The device takes crisp, bright photos and is simple to use. With it in hand, you'll be missing some pocket camera features, but mostly you'll be apologizing to your increasingly dusty digital friend.

The phone runs Google's and costs $200 with a two-year .

Although you can easily find a cheap digital camera that can take higher-resolution photos than the myTouch, the phone has a lens that gathers more light, which makes for better shots in dim lighting. Indeed, I generally found the phone's built-in flash too blinding and got better results by simply using the camera's night setting.

It's also very quick to take photos. On lots of cellphone cameras, there's a lot of shutter lag, which refers to the irritating gap between when you press the shutter button and when the camera actually takes a photo. T-Mobile touts the myTouch's camera as having "zero" shutter lag. The camera records continuously when the camera application is open and grabs the frame that corresponds with when you pressed the button.

Indeed, it was better than nearly all cellphone cameras I've tried, and it's on par with Apple's iPhone and the Pre, made by Hewlett-Packard Co.'s Palm division. But there did seem to be bit of a gap, especially when taking action shots.

The myTouch's biggest issue, sadly, is the same one you encounter on virtually all cameras. There's no optical zoom, which is where the camera lens moves closer to subjects. To conserve space and cut down on moving parts, cellphones generally include optical zoom's dumb cousin, digital zoom. That's a software trick that simply magnifies what the camera sees, without making images as sharp as they are with optical zoom.

Unfortunately, this makes it difficult to take detailed shots of far-away objects. Using the myTouch on a canoe trip, ducks and a blue heron snapped at a distance looked like pitifully tiny parts of a larger scene. Cropping the photos and zooming in on my feathered subjects made them look pixelated.

That said, the myTouch's camera is quite good for close-up shots. I took plenty of sharp, bright shots of my friends with the phone. And when using the camera's macro, or close-up, setting, I was able to capture some great photos of textured objects such as a woven bicycle basket and brightly colored ones including flowers in a planter.

As is the case with standalone digital cameras, the myTouch's camera includes facial recognition and smile-and-blink detection, as well as preset "scenes" for doing such things as taking portraits or action shots.

One cool feature is a mode for HDR, or high-dynamic range. The iPhone has one, too. It shoots several images with slightly different exposure settings and combines them into one image with richer colors. I got some cool shots with this setting in particular.

And if you're into videos, it will record high-resolution clips, too.

Mostly, I found myself switching back and forth between the auto and manual modes. It was nice to let the camera decide which settings it thought were best, but I also liked to play with the exposure, contrast and various color filters.

I found the camera performed best in moderate and bright light - a well-lit office or outside on a sunny day. On some of my canoe trip photos, colors looked somewhat washed out in very bright sunlight. Perhaps that could be fixed by tweaking the settings.

The phone includes an 8-gigabyte microSD memory card, which provides plenty of space for shots. There's also 4 GB of memory on the phone.

In places where I had access to T-Mobile's new high-speed network, I could quickly upload photos to Flickr and Facebook, something I couldn't do easily from a point-and-shoot camera.

Of course, the myTouch is also a phone. In general, it performs its phone-related tasks well. It runs version 2.2 of Android, rather than the latest version for smartphones, so it doesn't get some of the latest features and speedier performance. But with its fast dual-core processor, the device only hiccupped a couple times while I was using it. Its touch screen, which measures 3.8 inches diagonally, is plenty spacious as a camera viewfinder and a display for webpages, emails and games.

In a day full of talking, checking and sending messages and taking photos, the phone's battery held up nicely. It's rated for up to 10 hours of talk time.

Probably the most glaring mistake overall is its slide-out keyboard, which was difficult to type on because the keys are not elevated enough. The phone doesn't even really need a physical keyboard anyway, as it includes Swype's excellent touch-screen keyboard software, which lets you slide your finger from letter to letter to type.

Here's an idea: Perhaps the next version of the myTouch could swap the keyboard hardware for a lens with optical zoom. That would make the phone's great camera even better and tempt me to leave my trusty behind for good.

Explore further: Chairless Chair solution offered as leg exoskeleton for work

More information: Update: In an Aug. 10 review of the myTouch 4G Slide smartphone, The Associated Press erroneously reported that the Android software running the device isn't the latest version for smartphones. The phone does use version 2.3, the most recent release.

3 /5 (10 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Samsung Announces AMOLED 12M Camera Phone

Sep 30, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Samsung Electronics today announced the launch of the ‘Samsung AMOLED 12M’ (Model Name: SCH-W880), the world’s first 12-megapixel camera phone with a 3-times optical zoom lens. The phone ...

Review: Apps can enhance smart phone cameras

Feb 11, 2011

(AP) -- Frankly, I can't remember the last time I picked up my digital camera. Since a smart phone is always on me, either in my bag or back pocket, I use its camera constantly while my perfectly capable ...

Review: 3-D silly, but EVO 3D smart overall

Jun 23, 2011

(AP) -- There has been a big push for 3-D at movie theaters and on TV sets, so it was only a matter of time before digitally enhanced fisticuffs started popping out of smartphone screens, too.

LG's Viewty is Back: Viewty Smart (LG-GC900)

Apr 20, 2009

LG Electronics announced today Viewty Smart (LG-GC900), a brand new camera phone with an Intelligent Shot Mode that makes it easy to take great pictures by automatically analyzing scenes and adjusting camera ...

Recommended for you

Giant tablets aimed at families

Aug 20, 2014

Costing a little more than an iPad but standing more than twice as tall, a new pair of giant tablets wants families to share cozier group experiences with technology.

Myo armband and smartglasses set for deskless workplace

Aug 20, 2014

Thalmic Labs, Canada-based makers of the Myo armband, has announced the integration of Myo with smartglasses, with the partnership help of a number of companies pairing the Myo with their products. The gesture-control ...

Sharp Aquos Crystal phone: Where's the bezel?

Aug 18, 2014

Just when you thought a fashionable gadget must be somewhat thin, Sharp is going to charm the smartphone fashion-conscious with a crazily thin phone, and it is arriving in the US quite soon. Gorgeous. Cool. ...

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

maxcypher
not rated yet Aug 10, 2011
We need a high-resolution, digital zoom for cells.
David_Wishengrad
not rated yet Aug 10, 2011
More ads...
Bob_B
5 / 5 (6) Aug 10, 2011
Sorry, I can't afford the price of the device, the cost to 'activate it', the cost of monthly phone service, the cost of monthly email, the cost of monthly Internet, the cost of...
irjsiq
not rated yet Aug 11, 2011
ref: "...using the camera's night setting."
Having taken numerous shots with a Fuji, 'without the Flash' and the screen totally black, I anticipated no results; however, when downloaded, using 'FinePix' the shots were clear and bright.
I even managed to shots as my Son's name scrolled-up the Scoreboard Display at His U of A Graduation!
Love Digital!
sherriffwoody
5 / 5 (2) Aug 11, 2011
I'm suprised the headline doesn't read "Review: Can a iPhone camera do it all?". The media seems to thinks its the only phone that exists these days
LuckyExplorer
5 / 5 (1) Aug 11, 2011
There are much more issues not just a missing optical zoom:
- color consistancy
- low light capabilities (noise levels)
- dynamic range
- image detail
All these points are worse compared to good compact cameras an they are really poor compared to DSLRs.
The clear answer is NO, and due to physical limits it never will.
Cell phone cameras are just fine for documentation, if you don't want to take haevy equipment with you, for a party, etc.
but they are not if you want to seriousely take pictures.
Every tool has its range of use, but none is really made far all. - "A Ferrary is no Land Rover"
Msean1941
not rated yet Aug 11, 2011
I like that, "Ferrary". It almost looks better than the original.
Nikola
not rated yet Aug 11, 2011
Not it can't do it all. Not even close to a dSLR. Maybe a cheap point and shoot. Nothing compares to a full-size CMOS sensor.
Eikka
not rated yet Aug 15, 2011
There are much more issues not just a missing optical zoom:
- color consistancy
- low light capabilities (noise levels)
- dynamic range
- image detail
All these points are worse compared to good compact cameras an they are really poor compared to DSLRs.


You could also add:
-adjustable focus/shutter/aperture
-proper image stabilizer

Cheap digital cameras have troubles doing anything with depth of field effects because the optics are so small that it acts more or less like a pinhole camera. It's difficult to take e.g. a portrait with a blurred background with a cheap compact camera.

Cellphone sensors and optics are even smaller. It simply views everything at "infinity" and that's that. Bokeh? No can do.

Depth of field is the thing that often makes professional photographs. Without focus, the pictures just become busy holiday snaps where you don't really know what the main subject is.