Orion spaceship set for new tests in Colorado

August 12, 2011 By DAN ELLIOTT , Associated Press

Orion spaceship set for new tests in Colorado (AP)

Enlarge

Engineers attach a collar to the escape vehicle on the Orion spacecraft at the Lockheed Martin facility in Denver on Friday, Aug. 12, 2011. They will use it to move the assembled craft to the testing chamber at left where it will be submitted to vibration testing. (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski)

(AP) -- A spaceship that could carry the next wave of astronauts to an asteroid or beyond is being prepared for a new round of tests at a Lockheed Martin facility near Denver.

Engineers have attached a launch-abort system to the nose of the capsule and will subject the combined spacecraft to a series of experiments to see if it can withstand the rigors of blastoff, Lockheed Martin said Friday.

The launch-abort system, essentially a rocket attached to the nose of the capsule, could lift the capsule off its booster rocket and carry it to safety if a problem developed before or during launch.

Lockheed Martin, of Bethesda, Md., is building the capsule, called the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle, under a $7.5 billion NASA contract issued in 2006.

The capsule was originally part of President George W. Bush's $100 billion program to return astronauts to the moon, called Constellation. President Barack Obama canceled the program last year, saying the U.S. would concentrate on developing new rocket technology instead.

Obama then revived the Orion portion of the program amid criticism that his plan lacked details and put U.S. space leadership at risk.

Orion doesn't yet have a destination. NASA has said it could service the space station in low Earth orbit or take four astronauts on more distant missions of up to 21 days. Lockheed Martin officials have said Orion could explore the far side of the moon, land humans on asteroids or take them to one of the moons of Mars, where they could control robotic instruments on the surface.

In the next round of tests, the capsule and launch-abort system will be subjected to sound vibrations at a Lockheed Martin facility in Waterton Canyon south of Denver.

The 55-foot-tall assembly will be lifted by a crane into a tall, elevator shaft-like chamber. Inside, more than a dozen horns powered by compressed nitrogen will create a thunderous low-pitch noise at 150 decibels. That will trigger vibrations like the ones generated by a launch or deployment of the abort system.

"It sounds like a freight train and a tornado all at once," Lockheed Martin's Paul Sannes.

Instruments on the capsule and abort system will tell engineers how well they hold up.

The abort system was successfully tested in May 2010 at White Sands Missile Range, N.M. An Orion mock-up was rocketed about a mile into the air at speeds of about 450 mph in just 2.5 seconds. The capsule then deployed parachutes and floated to the ground.

It landed about a mile north of the launch site.

After the vibration tests are finished, the spacecraft will be taken to the NASA Langley Research Center in Hampton, Va., for landing tests. It would land in the ocean.

©2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Techno1
Aug 13, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Orion doesn't yet have a destination. NASA has said it could service the space station in low Earth orbit or take four astronauts on more distant missions of up to 21 days. Lockheed Martin officials have said Orion could explore the far side of the moon, land humans on asteroids or take them to one of the moons of Mars, where they could control robotic instruments on the surface


I don't see how that can be possible.

There is no publicly declared rocket engine under developement that would be capable of even a 1 way trip to Mars in 21 days, nevermind a round trip plus stoppage time to actually do anything worth sending humans...

It would take Deadalus, NERVA, or a Nuclear Pulse Engine just to make it 1 way in 21 days.

So either somebody is a liar, or else there is something HUGE in the workings at NASA and JPL...
ShotmanMaslo
Aug 13, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I don't see how that can be possible.


21 day limit applies only to Orion capsule itself, mission to Mars would utilize many more supporting modules.
Techno1
Aug 13, 2011

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (2)
21 day limit applies only to Orion capsule itself, mission to Mars would utilize many more supporting modules.


If you're referring to the concept of a spun space ship and supporting power supply and hydroponics, etc, I've seen such proposals.

Unfortunately, I think the designers are/were a bit short-sighted, as I was quickly able to double the crew, cargo, and landers capacity simply by replacing the counter-weight with a second crew module and all of it's associated components.

I don't know what happens to people when they get a government job, but it's like their brain went out the window.
eachus
Aug 13, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The Orion capsule is not a spaceship. A spaceship takes you from the vicinity of one planet or major moon to another. A lander or orbiter takes you to and from (or from and to) the planet or moon's surface and orbit.

So the Orion capsule could be the landing system of a spaceship that traveled from Earth to Mars and back. Unfortunately, it is not up to a return from the surface of Mars, although it could handle a landing and return from either of Mars' two moons.
Techno1
Aug 13, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Eachus:

It's not going to happen unless there's an economic incentive.

The people will absolutely have a revolution if the government tries to spend the amount of money that would be allegedly needed to fund a manned mission to the Martian moons.

We're talking about a trillion dollars to start. Just flat out spend a trillion just to send 4 people to a space rock, and maybe bring back some soil samples, some loose rocks, and a few core samples and bring it back to earth...

An un-manned lander robot could do this for a fraction of the cost, but even that would be the most expensive single NASA mission in my lifetime so far...
macsglen
Aug 13, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
@Techno1:
If we pulled out of Iraq and Afghanistan, we could afford as many manned Mars missions as we wanted.
Watch me not holding my breath for _that_ to happen . . .
LKD
Aug 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
If we pulled out of Iraq and Afghanistan, we could afford as many manned Mars missions as we wanted. Watch me not holding my breath for _that_ to happen . . .


I am not sure you understand how expensive it would be to travel to Mars. If those wars were ended, it would take 20 years of saving before you could fly there. And that's assuming that we could figure out a way for the astronauts to survive the return to Earth's gravity.
ShotmanMaslo
Aug 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I am not sure you understand how expensive it would be to travel to Mars. If those wars were ended, it would take 20 years of saving before you could fly there.


Why such a high cost?
ShotmanMaslo
Aug 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
And that's assuming that we could figure out a way for the astronauts to survive the return to Earth's gravity.


Rotational gravity is one option. Also, return after year and a half in weightlessness can be quite easily survived by humans, as is already proven. Mars mission need not be much longer.
LKD
Aug 17, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Why such a high cost?


You need to send at least 5 rockets to accomplish that mission. Each would be 100 billion or more.

1 Rocket to get the astronauts there.
1-2 Rockets for supplies.
3 rockets to get a rocket to Mars that has a full tank of fuel to return them to Earth.

That's of course just the rockets and propellant. And not including where they will live, how they will live and what they'll do there. It's easily a 2 trillion dollar bill to accomplish this.
ShotmanMaslo
Aug 17, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
You need to send at least 5 rockets to accomplish that mission. Each would be 100 billion or more.


Again, why such a high cost for the 5 rockets? Most of the mass needed for such mission will be cheap propellant.

Prepositioning quite a lot of mass on Martian surface and the manned spacecraft itself will be the most expensive parts of the mission, but even then, I cannot imagine why it should cost trillions.
LKD
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Again, why such a high cost for the 5 rockets? Most of the mass needed for such mission will be cheap propellant.


This has to break from the earth's gravity well with a several ton payload. Additionally you have to build all the equipment, test all the machines, develop and devise landers. You have to design and test everything from scratch. That's just exceptionally expensive if you want to assure everything works upon arrival on Mars.
ShotmanMaslo
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
This has to break from the earth's gravity well with a several ton payload.


Thats not so expensive at all.

Additionally you have to build all the equipment, test all the machines, develop and devise landers. You have to design and test everything from scratch. That's just exceptionally expensive if you want to assure everything works upon arrival on Mars.


Expensive it is, but I doubt it would cost trillions. Few hundreds of billions for the whole mission is my estimate, even less if the trend of spaceflight privatisation continues.
LKD
Aug 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Expensive it is, but I doubt it would cost trillions. Few hundreds of billions for the whole mission is my estimate, even less if the trend of spaceflight privatisation continues.


I understand your point, but feel I need to disagree. NASA has not had a very good track record being fiscally responsible. but know I would love to be proven wrong. And would truly enjoy a humble sandwich with a healthy pride topping. :D
Rank 5 /5 (7 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
    createdMay 19, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 4 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 1 hour ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 1 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (13) | comments 39

Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue

UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.

Space & Earth / Environment

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.7 / 5 (7) | comments 39


Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research

UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...

Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Scientists develop ultra-sensitive test that detects diseases in their earliest stages

Scientists have developed an ultra-sensitive test that should enable them to detect signs of a disease in its earliest stages, in research published today in the journal Nature Materials.