The first nuclear power plant for settlements on Moon, Mars
An artist’s concept of a fission surface power system on the surface of the Moon. Credit: Galaxy Wire
(PhysOrg.com) -- The first nuclear power plant being considered for production of electricity for manned or unmanned bases on the Moon, Mars and other planets may really look like it came from outer space, according to a leader of the project who spoke here today at the 242nd National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS).
James E. Werner said that innovative fission technology for surface power applications is far different from the familiar terrestrial nuclear power stations, which sprawl over huge tracts of land and have large structures such as cooling towers.
"People would never recognize the fission power system as a nuclear power reactor," said Werner. "The reactor itself may be about 1 1/2 feet wide by 2 1/2 feet high, about the size of a carry-on suitcase. There are no cooling towers. A fission power system is a compact, reliable, safe system that may be critical to the establishment of outposts or habitats on other planets. Fission power technology can be applied on Earth's Moon, on Mars, or wherever NASA sees the need for continuous power."
The team is scheduled to build a technology demonstration unit in 2012. This is a cooperative project between the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Werner leads the DOE's Idaho National Laboratory involvement in this effort, which includes participation in the reactor design and modeling teams, fuel development and fabrication and development of a small electrical pump for the liquid metal cooled system.
Sunlight and fuel cells were the mainstays for generating electricity for space missions in the past, but engineers realized that solar energy has limitations. Solar cells do a great job supplying electricity in near-Earth orbits and for satellite-borne equipment, but nuclear power offers some unique capabilities that could support manned outposts on other planets or moons.
"The biggest difference between solar and nuclear reactors is that nuclear reactors can produce power in any environment," Werner explained. "Fission power technology doesn't rely on sunlight, making it able to produce large, steady amounts of power at night or in harsh environments like those found on the Moon or Mars. A fission power system on the Moon could generate 40 kilowatts or more of electric power, approximately the same amount of energy needed to power eight houses on Earth." In addition, he said that a fission power system could operate in a variety of locations such as in craters, canyons or caves.
"The main point is that nuclear power has the ability to provide a power-rich environment to the astronauts or science packages anywhere in our solar system and that this technology is mature, affordable and safe to use," Werner said.
Fission power systems rely on energy generated from nuclear fission. Nuclear fission works by splitting uranium atoms to generate heat that is then converted into electric power. The primary components of a fission power system are similar to those found in the commercial reactors currently in use: a heat source, power conversion, heat rejection and power conditioning and distribution.
Werner added that despite the similarities in components, fission power systems for space applications feature a number of differences compared with commercial reactors.
"While the physics are the same, the low power levels, control of the reactor and the material used for neutron reflection back into the core are completely different," Werner said. "Weight is also a significant factor that must be minimized in a space reactor that is not considered in a commercial reactor."
Werner contends that once the technology is developed and validated, it may prove to be one of the most affordable and versatile options for providing long-term base power for the space exploration programs.
Provided by
American Chemical Society
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
3 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
15 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
8 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
3
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (22) |
56
|
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (12) |
18
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (5)
Don't use the outdate nuclear technology that we have right now but the latest & safest design in nuclear power technology.
In fact the present nuclear reactors should be dismantle slowly and be replace with the latest, safest nuclear technology.
Look at what happen in Japan nuclear disaster with their outdated nuclear reactor. That reactor was so outdated and flaw in design that it was retrofit to, supposedly, meet minimum safety standard.
If they had dismantle all these outdated nuclear reactors, regardless of the economic cost, and replace it with the latest & safest nuclear reactor, the Japan nuclear disaster would have never happen.
It is about time that they consider using nuclear power for space travel and exploration.
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 4.9 / 5 (7)
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (14)
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (6)
Aug 28, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
Also the greenies refusal to allow spent fuel rods to be transported to safe locations and instead demanding they stay in pools above the reactors caused problems. If the spend fuel rods were transported to geologically stable regions for recycling Fukishima would have been somewhat better. Still bad.
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
Sure it might take baby steps right now but I believe using current launch vehicles we could send up a modified nuclear powered tunnel borer and start a small underground habitat that would be suitable for miners and workers. Then work could start on building, from the ground up, a "new earth" with next gen. foundries and manufacturing facilities. Pretty soon we could colonize the surface or near surface using simple greenhouses made with 2 layers of glass and a sufficient amount of static water between them to keep you safe from radiation.
Heck I have a feeling if there are any alien artifacts to be found up there it would make the whole trip worth it.
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
You will never live long enough to see another American on the Moon. You will live long enough to see a Manned Chinese/Russian base on the moon.
Nuclear power makes significantly more sense on the moon than on earth. Primarily because of the ease of waste disposal, and the simplicity of reactor designs that do not need significant shielding, and the lack of proliferation potenial.
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
The problem with the Moon for solar is of course the nights, Which last 14 earth days.
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Erm. This is not a 'greenie' demand but a sensible practice because the spent fuel rods would melt if not properly cooled (which is very hard to do en route and would also pose a huge risk if anything were to happen on the road - something that is far more likely to happen than a Tsunami)
Add to that that there is no 'safe' storage anywhere on the planet for spent fuel rods. The areas that were said to be safe for thousands of years (salt mines) are already leaking after 40 years.
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Which is kind of hard because to run a nuclear reactor you need lots of water which means either:
- you locate it near a river
or
- you locate it near a shore
Shores are prone to tsunamis.
River areas are prone to earthquakes (because many rivers run in valleys which are oftentimes just cracks that were created by earthquakes at some point in the past)
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
there was no long term plan. so it is better to assume we are bad at long term planning and just force ourselves to go 'small' . that way when changes are eventually needed, it will be easier to make them, unit by unit.
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (3)
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Any discussion of this technology should reference the work at Oak Ridge in the 60's and Kirk Sorensen and his work within NASA.
Aug 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Sep 02, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Sep 04, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Light weight nukes and reliable metal pumping should be facinating, not empty of detail.