The Milky Way's supermassive black hole

August 8, 2011

The milky way's supermassive black hole

A Chandra X-ray Observatory image of the region around the supermassive black hole at our Galaxy's center. (More than two thousand other X-ray sources were detected around the central black hole, making this one of the richest fields ever observed.) Credit: Chandra X-ray Observatory

Supermassive black holes - objects with masses of millions or even billions of suns - are found at the nuclei of galaxies. Our Milky Way galaxy, for example, has a massive black hole at its core, albeit one that is relatively quiescent. Despite their reputation for being implacable sinks for matter and energy, both radiation and matter can be ejected from the vicinity of a black hole, often in powerful jets, when it is ringed by a disk of matter and material accretes onto it.

Thus in dramatic cases, like quasars, nuclear are responsible for some of the most spectacular phenomena in the cosmos.

A black hole is so simple that it can be completely described by only three parameters: its mass, its spin, and its electric charge. The at the center of the Milky Way, because it is example closest to us, has been a prime target for study by scientists trying to measure these parameters and understand how they influence the behavior of the region. For example, why it is that our black hole is so quiescent, while bright jets and luminous emission are seen in more dramatic cases?

CfA astronomer Avi Loeb, his recent student Avery Broderick, and two colleagues have modeled the nature of the Milky Way's black hole. The mass has been estimated by other scientists who, by watching the motions of stars in its vicinity, find that it is about 4.3 million solar-masses. (The charge of the black hole remains unknown.)

The CfA team used results from ultra-high spatial resolution millimeter wavelength astronomy to measure the angular size of the weak emission around the black hole; the equipment has an angular precision roughly equivalent to seeing a dime on the moon. Based on their analysis of the data, they find that the Milky Way's central black hole spin is at best modest - although whether this explains why the emission is weak is still uncertain. They also conclude that the millimeter emission is slightly extended - it has an axis ratio of about 2.3, but the orientation does not appear to align with any other known features.

Not least, their models strongly suggest that the comes from some kind of an accretion process. The new result is just the opening salvo that indicates astronomy has entered an epoch in which it will be able to study black hole physics directly using high spatial resolution techniques.

Provided by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics search and more info website

4.8 /5 (8 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

jsdarkdestruction
Aug 08, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Awesome, I cant wait to learn more.
Pete1983
Aug 08, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Would love to learn more myself. I can barely visualise anything related to black holes. Hawking radiation isn't so bad if you accept QM, but I still don't understand how spin comes into it.

Sure, any accreting body will maintain it's angular momentum, thus speeding up it's rotation, but if the radius of the matter is 0 (as it seemingly is), does this not make rotational speed infinite? Yet if spin is measurable, then can we not determine the radius of the degenerate matter inside the black hole itself?

I guess the spin measurement in this case must be frame dragging or something and not related to classical spin...
Objectivist
Aug 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Would love to learn more myself. I can barely visualise anything related to black holes. Hawking radiation isn't so bad if you accept QM, but I still don't understand how spin comes into it.

Sure, any accreting body will maintain it's angular momentum, thus speeding up it's rotation, but if the radius of the matter is 0 (as it seemingly is), does this not make rotational speed infinite? Yet if spin is measurable, then can we not determine the radius of the degenerate matter inside the black hole itself?

I guess the spin measurement in this case must be frame dragging or something and not related to classical spin...
I believe the radius of a black hole is infinitesimal and not 0.
LKD
Aug 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I believe the radius of a black hole is infinitesimal and not 0.


It should be the radius of the event horizon. Unless something has changed.
Objectivist
Aug 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
It should be the radius of the event horizon. Unless something has changed.
The event horizon does not mark the edge of the object itself, it only marks the point where gravity pull exceeds the speed of light. The object itself is much, much smaller than the event horizon.
Callippo
Aug 10, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
IMO black hole is just a dense blob of vacuum, a dense extension of space-time. It may exhibit solid surface bellow event horizon, but it will be only mildly different from the rest of space-time inside. You can imagine it like the hot & fuzzy surface of supercritical fluid with no sharp boundary. IMO black holes, in which the surface of matter (which they're formed) reaches the event horizon, manifest itself like brightly shinning quasars and they evaporating excessive matter at the free space.

Why we cannot see the solid surface of black hole? Because it's density is comparable with the density of the tiniest and most dense particles in our body: quarks and neutrinos. We cannot observe/interacts with higher gradients of energy density, than the gradients which are forming observable bodies. Such gradient of energy would dissolve us into radiation and we would observe anything.
lomed
Aug 10, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Sure, any accreting body will maintain it's angular momentum, thus speeding up it's rotation, but if the radius of the matter is 0 (as it seemingly is), does this not make rotational speed infinite? Yet if spin is measurable, then can we not determine the radius of the degenerate matter inside the black hole itself?
It turns out that the singularity in a black hole with non-zero angular momentum is in the form of a ring rather than a point (at least for the Kerr solution), so it has non-zero extension in one (angular) direction.
jsdarkdestruction
Aug 10, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Well, thats a great opinion i guess, but it's still just that, an opinion. Thanks for sharing though.
LKD
Aug 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The event horizon does not mark the edge of the object itself


It does, and is the determination for the size of a black hole. The properties within that area are anyone's theoretical guess. That delves into an area of physics that no one can predict yet.
yyz
Aug 11, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"It turns out that the singularity in a black hole with non-zero angular momentum is in the form of a ring rather than a point (at least for the Kerr solution), so it has non-zero extension in one (angular) direction."

IOW a ring singularity: http://en.wikiped...gularity
Pete1983
Aug 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Thanks for the responses guys. So I guess this is territory that is pretty speculative at the moment (a bit like strange stars and such). Thanks for clearing up that the singularity itself may not be a point of 0 radius. The ring concept of the Kerr solution that you mentioned lomed is very interesting... and seemingly quite sensible from a spacetime perspective.

Although I must admit I still like the idea of this causing a tension on spacetime large enough to actually "crack through" spacetime itself. What the implications of this are I have no idea, or even if this occurs in any models, but regardless, the concept is cool.
Pete1983
Aug 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Oh and yyz thank you very much for that link...

Extremely fun stuff. Wormholes ftw.
Objectivist
Aug 12, 2011

Rank: not rated yet

It does, and is the determination for the size of a black hole. The properties within that area are anyone's theoretical guess. That delves into an area of physics that no one can predict yet.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it marks the edge of the black hole; where light cannot return, i.e. the point where gravity pull exceeds the speed of light. The object itself, the singularity, is much smaller than the event horizon.

I don't think we disagree. We're just answering two different questions. One being the size of a black hole and one being the size of the singularity.
ccr5Delta32
Aug 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe it marks the edge of the black hole; where light cannot return, i.e. the point where gravity pull exceeds the speed of light. The object itself, the singularity, is much smaller than the event horizon.

Presumably if we imagine space inside the event horizon as familiar to what we commonly understand as 3D space ,we could have two objects or more .The only qualitative data we have are the orbits of S2 and the other stars ,witch appear to orbit a point mass,It could be a just so coincidence or the idea of space inside EH is faulty
Rank 4.8 /5 (8 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
    createdMay 19, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy

Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...

Space & Earth / Environment

created 32 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 2 | with audio podcast

10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction

It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created 33 minutes ago | popularity not rated yet | comments 0 | with audio podcast

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (13) | comments 39

Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue

UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.

Space & Earth / Environment

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.7 / 5 (7) | comments 39


Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study

At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...

Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture

When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.

'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...

T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows

By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...

Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus

An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.

Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research

UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...