How does microgravity affect astronauts?

Aug 04, 2011 By Melissa Beattie-Moss
How does microgravity affect astronauts?
International Space Station astronauts Mike Fincke (left) and Gennady Padalka could spend longer in space if they lost less bone. Credit: NASA

Anyone over 40 knows firsthand the effects of gravity's constant downward pull on our faces and bodies. It is an immutable force that Einstein called a “curvature of space-time” -- but the curvature caused by gravity is a little closer to home, in our very bones.

Every day, the weight of gravity compresses the sponge-like discs between our spinal vertebrae, making us up to three-quarters of an inch shorter by evening. Most of that height loss is regained while we sleep, as the discs are rehydrated, but not all, which is why our stature slowly shrinks over a lifetime.

In the weightless environment of space, are spared the bone-compressing impact of gravity?

It's a common fallacy, said Raj Acharya, head of Penn State's Department of Computer Science and Engineering, but the reality is does occur in space. “One of the most significant concerns for NASA,” he explained, “is the deterioration of bone conditions of astronauts exposed to microgravity.” In fact, bone loss is one of the two biggest health risks (radiation exposure is the other) that astronauts face.

A past research fellow at NASA and the Department of Defense, Acharya developed algorithms used to monitor bone conditions of astronauts under microgravity conditions. Microgravity -- also called zero gravity -- doesn't mean there's no pressure on our bodies, Acharya noted. Most human spaceflights take place in an orbital altitude between 120-360 miles above Earth's surface, only about 2 percent of the distance to the moon. Within that range, astronauts still are exposed to about 90 percent of the full strength of Earth's gravitational field. (If not for this constant pull of Earth's gravity, the space station and space shuttle would drift out of orbit.)

Astronauts may be nearly weightless (the simultaneous “free fall” of the spacecraft and everything within it gives the illusion of zero gravity) but they are not massless -- the mass of their bodies remains the same and it's this mass that gravity works upon. In fact, explained Acharya, astronauts lose bone mass and strength much faster in space than on Earth, since they miss the weight-bearing exercise we get from simply moving our bodies around (pushing back against gravity's resistance) on our planet's surface.
The tissue at greatest risk for astronauts is trabecular bone, the softer stuff found near joints at the end of long bones, said Acharya. “Microgravity may result in thinning of the trabecular network and result in fractures,” he said, noting that the lattice-like rods and struts in trabecular bone may become permanently thinned and weakened, making astronauts on long-duration missions very susceptible to hip and spinal fractures.

In his research, Acharya turned to fractals -- fascinating geometric patterns with repeating, self-similar patterns -- to better understand bone loss. “The trabecular bone has a honey-comb like network structure, which is why fractals are particularly good mathematical objects to model the trabecular structure,” he explained. “My research provides a mechanism for modeling the trabecular bone as a fractal. The deterioration of bone condition actually manifests itself as a change in fractal dimension.” Added Acharya, “Traditionally, only bone-mass effects were used by NASA,” whereas fractal analysis allows a more in-depth look at bone-tissue architecture in its entirety.

Now that our space program is gaining a better understanding of trabecular bone loss risks, what is being done about it? In addition to exploring the use of bone-strengthening drugs and superhero-style spacesuits that replicate , “NASA also is using counter measures such as exercise to combat the effects of microgravity on the bones of astronauts,” Acharya says.

One thing is for certain, he noted: Before we humans attempt the trip to Mars, we'll need some reliable measures to reduce the physical toll of life in space. That round-trip may take up to three years to complete and research suggests that astronauts could lose close to half their bone mass before they return.

So, Baby Boomers, take heed. The next time you're tempted to complain about sagging bodies and faces, remember that your proximity to Earth's gravitational field is (so to speak) actually your lucky break.

Explore further: MAVEN studies passing comet and its effects

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Sticks and stones break bones, but new study may prevent it

Dec 09, 2009

The best way to prevent a fracture is to stop bones from reaching the point where they are prone to breaking, but understanding the process of how bones form and mature has been challenging. Now researchers at the University ...

One Dose of Radiation Causes 30 Percent Spongy Bone Loss

Jul 12, 2006

Mice receiving just one therapeutic dose of radiation lost up to 39% of the spongy portion of their inner bone, reducing the inner bone’s weight bearing connections by up to 64%, researchers reported. The study, which appears ...

Recommended for you

NASA Webb's heart survives deep freeze test

7 hours ago

After 116 days of being subjected to extremely frigid temperatures like that in space, the heart of the James Webb Space Telescope, the Integrated Science Instrument Module (ISIM) and its sensitive instruments, ...

Cosmic rays threaten future deep-space astronaut missions

12 hours ago

Crewed missions to Mars remain an essential goal for NASA, but scientists are only now beginning to understand and characterize the radiation hazards that could make such ventures risky, concludes a new paper ...

MAVEN studies passing comet and its effects

14 hours ago

NASA's newest orbiter at Mars, MAVEN, took precautions to avoid harm from a dust-spewing comet that flew near Mars today and is studying the flyby's effects on the Red Planet's atmosphere.

How to safely enjoy the October 23 partial solar eclipse

14 hours ago

2014 – a year rich in eclipses. The Moon dutifully slid into Earth's shadow in April and October gifting us with two total lunars. Now it's the Sun's turn. This Thursday October 23 skywatchers across much ...

How to grip an asteroid

15 hours ago

For someone like Edward Fouad, a junior at Caltech who has always been interested in robotics and mechanical engineering, it was an ideal project: help develop robotic technology that could one day fly on ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

not rated yet Aug 04, 2011
That was quite painful to read. If you're in free fall, the presence of Earth's gravity field is a non-issue as far as the bones are concerned. I would like to have read more about the exercise and gravity-replicating-suits (?) being proposed.
not rated yet Aug 05, 2011
Agreed. The clarification of "zero-gravity" was entirely unnecessary, along with the orbits and free fall. In fact beyond mentioning the fractal based modelling of the trabecular bone, this article contains basically no "news" at all. It would be just as informative if it read "we hit fish with hammers and then looked at the bones in the hope of gaining insight into microgravity bone loss".