Justice Department moves to block AT&T takeover of T-Mobile (Update)

August 31, 2011

AT&T said it will "vigorously" fight the Justice Department's move to block its $39 billion takeover of rival T-Mobile

Enlarge

US telecoms giant AT&T said Wednesday it will "vigorously" fight the Justice Department's move to block its $39 billion takeover of rival T-Mobile.

The US Justice Department moved Wednesday to block US telecom giant AT&T's $39 billion takeover of T-Mobile, saying the mega-merger would harm competition.

AT&T shares plunged nearly four percent on Wall Street after the Justice Department said it had filed a lawsuit in US District Court in Washington opposing the acquisition.

"We are seeking to block this deal in order to maintain a vibrant and competitive marketplace," Deputy Attorney General James Cole said at a news conference.

"Any way you look at this transaction it is anti-competitive," added Sharis Pozen, acting assistant attorney general in charge of the Justice Department's antitrust division.

AT&T general counsel Wayne Watts said the telecom giant was "surprised and disappointed" by the move and had received "no indication from the Department of Justice that this action was being contemplated" despite numerous meetings.

Watts said AT&T will challenge the Justice Department in court.

"The Department of Justice has the burden of proving alleged anti-competitive effects and we intend to vigorously contest this matter in court," Watts said. "We remain confident that this merger is in the best interest of consumers and our country, and the facts will prevail in court."

Telecommunications analysts at Barclays Capital put AT&T's probability of success at 35-40 percent, a significant reduction from their initial estimate of 75 percent.

Harold Feld, legal director of Public Knowledge, a digital rights advocacy group in Washington, said there are "really no good options for AT&T at this point.

"AT&T can delay the inevitable by fighting," Feld wrote in a blog post. "But while AT&T still has a theoretical road to victory, I don't think anyone seriously wants to take that bet."

AT&T's takeover of T-Mobile, the US unit of Germany's Deutsche Telekom, had been expected to come in for tough regulatory scrutiny following criticism from some members of the US Congress and others.

But AT&T had been confident of getting the green light from the US antitrust authorities, and the transaction carries an exceptionally high "breakup fee" of $3 billion.

AT&T, T-Mobile, Sprint Nextel and Verizon Wireless provide more than 90 percent of the mobile wireless connections in the United States.

Verizon currently holds a 31 percent share of the US wireless subscriber market followed by AT&T with 27 percent.

Adding T-Mobile's 37.3 million customers would give AT&T a 39 percent market share, putting it ahead of Verizon and Sprint, which had also expressed interest in acquiring T-Mobile.

US Senator Herb Kohl, a Democrat from Wisconsin who chairs the Senate Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights Subcommittee, and Sprint praised the Justice Department's decision.

"We applaud the Justice Department for their action to protect consumers in a powerful and growing industry that reaches virtually every American," Kohl said. "Preserving choices means ensuring competition, and competition ultimately benefits consumers."

Vonya McCann, Sprint's senior vice president of government affairs, said the Justice Department has "put consumers' interests first."

"Sprint applauds the DoJ for conducting a careful and thorough review and for reaching a just decision -- one which will ensure that consumers continue to reap the benefits of a competitive US wireless industry," McCann said.

The Justice Department said AT&T's acquisition of T-Mobile "would eliminate a company that has been a disruptive force through low pricing and innovation."

"The combination of AT&T and T-Mobile would result in tens of millions of consumers all across the United States facing higher prices, fewer choices and lower quality products for mobile wireless services," Deputy Attorney General Cole said.

The US Federal Communications Commission had also been examining the deal.

FCC chairman Julius Genachowski said that although the process was not complete "the record before this agency also raises serious concerns about the impact of the proposed transaction on competition.

"Vibrant competition in wireless services is vital to innovation, investment, economic growth and job creation, and to drive our global leadership in mobile," Genachowski said.

AT&T shares lost 3.85 percent on Wall Street to close at $28.48. Verizon shed 0.40 percent to $36.17 while Sprint gained 5.92 percent to $3.76.

(c) 2011 AFP

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Mikeal
Aug 31, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
"We remain confident that this merger is in the best interest of consumers and our country, and the facts will prevail in court," he said."

Later he laughs in solitutde, "Muahahaha....muahahaha".
Turritopsis
Sep 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
That is unfair interjection in the merger and acquisition of T-mobile. These regulations are unfair and are obviously sparked by the competition. If Verizon and Sprint wanted T-mobile they should have bid more than AT&T to secure the acquisition instead of calling Big Brother to come in and save them.

They say that the merger would put them at a disadvantage. Big business is the market trend. Verizon and Sprint should have merged to collectively gain power over AT&T and after minimizing their share they could have sub divided leaving them with a larger share of the market than they started with.

This, or lower costs of service. People respond to paying less. Verizon and Sprint hold the power to knock AT&T out but they would have to temporarily minimize their profits or take on losses for a few quarters.

I will not strategize on their behalf as I have nothing to gain here, but I will say these are cowardly actions by Verizon and Sprint. These companies are viciously fighting for
Turritopsis
Sep 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
market dominance, now that they fear losing they call their Big Brother to finish the fight for them. That's not how the world works. If you're going to take on the competition have the balls to stay in the fight win or lose.

Either work on winning customers over or get out of the game.

Turritopsis
Sep 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The Justice Department said AT&T's acquisition of T-Mobile "would eliminate a company that has been a disruptive force through low pricing and innovation."


Maybe Sprint and Verizon should lower their prices, this would surely get AT&T customers to switch over to them. If they feel constrained and unable to cut price, maybe they should come up with new ideas (and copyright them) that will keep their worth above AT&T without lowering price. People respond to getting more features and services.
Turritopsis
Sep 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Verizon and Sprint, which had also expressed interest in acquiring T-Mobile.


"Sprint applauds the DoJ for conducting a careful and thorough review and for reaching a just decision -- one which will ensure that consumers continue to reap the benefits of a competitive US wireless industry," McCann said.
Turritopsis
Sep 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Fraud.

Hypocrite.

Turritopsis
Sep 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The DoJ is either in on this scheme or they are being duped. Either way it shows a weakness on their behalf.
ryggesogn2
Sep 01, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
ATT and T-Mobile provide lousy service. Why is the govt wasting time and tax payers money?
The DoJ is either in on this scheme or they are being duped. Either way it shows a weakness on their behalf.

Of course the govt is in on it. It is called 'progressivism'.
Vendicar_Decarian
Sep 04, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
"Why is the govt wasting time and tax payers money?" - RyggTard

For the purpose of fostering competition and to prevent the monopolization of facets of the marketplace by AT&T.

Contrary to Whack Tard Libertarian Ideology, without regulation, all markets devolve into monopolies.
Vendicar_Decarian
Sep 04, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
all unregulated markets devolve into monopolies.
ryggesogn2
Sep 04, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
ATT has no monopoly.
Apple lost revenue I suspect by only offering ATT service with Iphones. That little flub allowed Verizon and Android to pick up market share.
The only way ATT can attract customers is if they are the only option. They have lousy service, which I am sure is a result of their being a govt protected monopoly for so many years.
Magnette
Sep 05, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
That's interesting, T-Mobile sold out in the UK a couple of years ago to the Orange network. I can only assume that the US version of the company stayed independant of any deals done in Europe and continued to trade as a singularity.
Rank 5 /5 (1 vote)
Tags

Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Technology / Software

created 6 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 2

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (22) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 13 | with audio podcast report

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (11) | comments 18


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...