Human mission to an asteroid: Why should NASA go?
August 24, 2011 By Nancy Atkinson, Universe Today
A human mission to an asteroid. Credit: Lockheed Martin
Imagine, if you can, the first time human eyes see Earth as a distant, pale blue dot. Weve dreamed of deep space missions for centuries, and during the Apollo era, space enthusiasts assumed wed surely be out there by now. Nevertheless, given the current state of faltering economies and potential budget cuts for NASA and other space agencies, sending humans beyond low Earth orbit might seem as impossible and unreachable as ever, if not more.
But NASA has been given a presidential directive to land astronauts on an asteroid by 2025, a mission that some say represents the most ambitious and audacious plan yet for the space agency.
The human mission to an asteroid is an extremely important national goal, Apollo astronaut Rusty Schweickart told Universe Today. It will focus both NASAs and the nations attention on we humans extending our capability beyond Earth/Moon space and into deep space. This is an essential capability in order to ultimately get to Mars, and a relatively short mission to a near-Earth asteroid is a logical first step in establishing a deep space human capability.
And, Schweickart added, the excitement factor of such a mission would be off the charts. Humans going into orbit around the Sun is pretty exciting! said Schweickart, who piloted the lunar module during the Apollo 9 mission in 1969. The Earth will be, for the first time to human eyes, a small blue dot.
But not everyone agrees that an asteroid is the best destination for humans. Several of Schweickarts Apollo compatriots, including Neil Armstrong, Jim Lovell and Gene Cernan, favor returning to the Moon and are concerned that President Obamas directive is a grounding of JFKs space legacy.
Compounding the issue is that NASA has not yet decided on a launch system capable of reaching deep space, much less started to build such a rocket.
Can NASA really go to an asteroid?
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden has called a human mission to an asteroid the hardest thing we can do.
Excited by the challenge, NASA chief technology officer Bobby Braun said, This is a risky, challenging mission. Its the kind of mission that engineers will eat up.
A human mission to an asteroid is a feat of technical prowess that might equal or exceed what it took for the US to reach the Moon in the 1960s. Remember scientists who thought the moon lander might disappear into a fluffy lunar surface? That reflects our current understanding of asteroids: we dont know how different asteroids are put together (rubble pile or solid surface?) and we certainly arent sure how to orbit and land on one.
One of the things we need to work on is figuring out what you actually do when you get to an asteroid, said Josh Hopkins from Lockheed Martin, who is the Principal Investigator for Advanced Human Exploration Missions. Hopkins leads a team of engineers who develop plans and concepts for a variety of future human exploration missions, including visits to asteroids. He and his team proposed the so-called Plymouth Rock mission to an asteroid (which well discuss more in a subsequent article), and have been working on the Orion Multi-purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV), which would be a key component of a human mission to an asteroid.
How do you fly in formation with an asteroid that has a very weak gravitational field, so that other perturbations such as slight pressure from the Sun would affect your orbit, Hopkins mused, in an interview with Universe Today. How do you interact with an asteroid, especially if you dont know exactly what its surface texture and composition is? How do you design anchors or hand-holds or tools that can dig into the surface?
Hypothetical astronaut mission to an asteroid. Credit: NASA Human Exploration Framework Team
Hopkins said he and his team have been working on developing some technologies that are fairly agnostic about the asteroid things that will work on a wide variety of asteroids, rather than being specific to an iron type- or carbonaceous-type asteroid.A weak gravity field means astronauts probably couldnt walk on some asteroids they might just float away, so ideas include installing handholds or using tethers, bungees, nets or jetpacks. In order for a spaceship to stay in orbit, astronauts might have to harpoon the asteroid and tether it to the ship.
Hopkins said many of those types of technologies are being developed for and will be demonstrated on NASAs OSIRIS-REx mission, the robotic sample return mission that NASA recently just selected for launch in 2016. That mission is very complimentary to a future human mission to an asteroid, Hopkins said.
Benefits
What benefits would a human asteroid mission provide?
It would add to our body of knowledge about these interesting, and occasionally dangerous bodies, said Schweickart, and benefit our interest in protecting the Earth from asteroid impacts. So the human mission to a NEO is a very high priority in my personal list.
Space shuttle astronaut Tom Jones says he thinks a mission to near Earth objects is a vital part of a planned human expansion into deep space. It would be an experiential stepping stone to Mars, and much more.
Planning 6-month round trips to these ancient bodies will teach us a great deal about the early history of the solar system, how we can extract the water known to be present on certain asteroids, techniques for deflecting a future impact from an asteroid, and applying this deep space experience toward human Mars exploration, Jones told Universe Today.
Because an asteroid mission will not require a large, expensive lander, the cost might be comparable to a shorter, lunar mission, and NEO expeditions will certainly show we have set our sights beyond the Moon, he said.
But Jones and others are concerned the Obama administration is not serious about such a mission and that the presidents rare mentions of a 2025 mission to a nearby asteroid has not led to firm NASA program plans, realistic milestones or funding.
I think 2025 is so far and so nebulous that this administration isnt taking any responsibility for making it happen, Jones said. They are just going to let that slide off the table until somebody else takes over.
Jones said he wouldnt be surprised if nothing concrete happens with a NASA deep space mission until there is an administration change.
The right course is to be more aggressive and say we want people out of Earth orbit in an Orion vehicle in 2020, so send them around the Moon to test out the ship, get them to the LaGrange points by 2020 and then you can start doing asteroid missions over the next few years, Jones said. Waiting for 2025 is just a political infinity in terms of making things happen.
Jones said politics aside, it is certainly feasible to do all this by 2020. That is nine years from now. My gosh, we are talking about getting a vehicle getting out of Earth orbit. If we cant do that in nine years, we probably dont have any hope of doing that in longer terms.
Can NASA do such a mission? Will it happen? If so, how? Which asteroid should humans visit?
Over the next few days, well take a closer look at the concepts and hurdles for a human mission to an asteroid and attempt to answer some of these questions.
Source: Universe Today
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
35
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...

Aug 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
You test out the endurance of manned spaceships without having to also worry about landing and take-off from a significant gravitational well on the very first try.
Might take along a few tools to see how viable it is to hollow out an asteroid (or probably just dig a few centimeters down for the first time out) in preparation for creating protected fuel/consumables stockpiles for future missions or even digging down enough to create habitats.
Maybe even check if the asteroid contains anything that is worth something - you never know.
So yes: I can see a lot of benefit in trying this first.
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Why not revisit the "tired, old ideas from the past" that made some sense in terms of actual progress? A small settlement on the moon with a station in permanent orbit around it. That will test out the endurance of anything needed.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
That seems to be the fate of all the visions about NASAs manned programs since Apollo was scrapped
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
With politicians just thinking from one election period to the next that's an extremely dicey foundation to base a permanent settlement (and one permanently relying on supplies from earth) on.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
What happened, did he get fed up with singing and thought he'd be an astronaut instead? :-)
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
The Chinese could just order it to get off the ground. One of the (very few) advantages of a centralized/autocratic government.
If the West doesn't do it then they will. Best would be if it were a joint effort, though.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
The article should be why should we hire/hitch a ride with the Russians or the Chinese to an asteroid.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
I unfortunately have to agree with you Pyle. Although the space race of the 60s and 70s was not driven by the profit motive, but by national pride and an intense rivalry--the embodiment of an intense ideological competition--with the USSR, those motivations are long gone. China isn't a rival so much as a supplier, so I think if the Chinese wish to embark on a such a program for the sake of national pride and to help cement their place as a world power, the West will pretty much just let it go and wish them well.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
I'm no fan of NASA, but this country needs the ability to put human beings in orbit. Space is the high ground, lose it and none of us is going to like the result.
Aug 25, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
I see you forget that the poor like myself gained the biggest decrease in tax rates, and with inflation at 10% at least per year, you are clearly oblivious to real life because I needed it to eat.
Anything NASA does is over budget and could be done cheaper by private companies. That's why government shouldn't do things and should stick to enforcement and regulation.
No one wants space but the military and scientists because there is no defined benefit to the common person. If a solar plant in space was under development, the public would support it. If a moon base for mining was introduced, the public would support it.
If you discard the bold colors of inspiration for gray minutia, the public will not care a wit about space.
The current malaise in NASA's lack of direction is their own fault.
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Just because the benefits of something aren't immediate or laid out for you before you embark on the adventure doesn't mean there won't be benefits "to the common person." Almost everything in our society has been impacted positively by government research in the space program and military.
Yeah, you paid a grand less while billionaires saved MILLIONS. Don't you get it yet? They lure you with pennies while they pass legislation that robs you blind.
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
Partially. Sure, GDM said it well, as have several articles and commenters on this site.
However, the public's short attention span and ignorance plays a major role as well. The public is more excited by the Cardashian princess than by anything that happens outside of our atmosphere. It is sad.
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
There are tremendous things we can do right now to encourage people to care about space for more than their satellite reception. The problem is from my prospective, we have a department full of bureaucrats in charge of the most exceptional scientists on this beautiful planet.
We can all argue about the politics and have conflicting valid and contentious debates till the end of time (and it could be fun), but I firmly believe that NASA needs to be rebuilt from scratch, hire back the shuttle scientists they disgracefully fired, and come up with their own purpose and goals to bring space to people.
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I wish I would have gotten that from your first post. I am afraid I assumed you had quite the opposite attitude.
I would say that some of the scientists they fired, such as our resident Revulsionist, might not warrant a second look. We definitely need to bring back some of the lost experience, but we also need new younger blood infused into the program as well.
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Young blood is already there. I just wish they had a real purpose more than the exploration missions. People gravitate towards results and physical accomplishment more-so than images and the underfunded research efforts.
I really believe we need to do something productive and industrious out there. The public will only ignore the neglected front more and more till China is the only one doing anything in space.
Aug 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Space however is outside the prevue of private concerns at our present place in history. It has immense military implications which makes it a government concern as well...just like any frontier. First the government, then private business...it's just the way it works.
We've dropped the ball and it absolutely, positively IS the fault of this dipshit administration. There isn't an excuse in the world that absolves them from their negligence in this matter.
Aug 27, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
I have heard the naysayers before way back in the time of Sputnik. "Why do the want to spend good money putting satellites up?" Imagine if we had taken their advice and bought a few new weapons.
Whoever colonises L4 and L5 has the high ground. Everyone else gets to leave the gravity well by invitation only. The asteroids are excellent material to use at the Lagrange points to build Dr Gerard O'Neil's cylinders.
http://en.wikiped...cylinder
We will have several orders of magnitude more people in space than at the bottom of the well.
All manufacturing will be done in space where it belongs. The surface of my planet is too precious to wreck with industrial pollution.