Hackers protest BART decision to block cellphones

Aug 15, 2011 By PAUL ELIAS and JOHN S. MARSHALL , Associated Press
This screen shot taken from myBART.org shows a page from the website after it was hacked by the hacker's group Anonymous on Sunday, Aug. 14, 2011. Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) district officials said they were attempting Sunday to shut down the hacker's group website that lists the names of thousands of San Francisco Bay area residents who are email subscribers of a legitimate BART website. (AP Photo/myBART.org)

(AP) -- Hackers broke into a website for San Francisco's mass transit system Sunday and posted contact information for more than 2,000 customers, the latest showdown between anarchists angry at perceived attempts to limit free speech and officials trying to control protests that grow out of social networking and have the potential to become violent.

The known as Anonymous posted people's names, phone numbers, and street and email addresses on its own website, while also calling for a disruption of the Bay Area Rapid Transit's evening commute Monday. The transit agency disabled the effected website, myBART.org, Sunday night after it also had been altered by apparent hackers who posted images of the so-called Guy Fawkes masks that anarchists have previously worn when showing up to physical protests.

The came in response to the BART's decision to block wireless service in several of its San Francisco stations Thursday night as the agency aimed to thwart a planned protest over a transit police shooting. Officials said the protest had been designed to disrupt the evening commute.

"We are Anonymous, we are your citizens, we are the people, we do not tolerate oppression from any government agency," the hackers wrote on their own website. "BART has proved multiple times that they have no problem exploiting and abusing the people."

BART spokesman Jim Allison described myBART.org as a "satellite site" used for marketing purposes. It's operated by an outside company and sends BART alerts and other information to customers, Allison said.

The names and contact info published by Sunday came from a database of 55,000 subscribers, he said. He did not know if the group had obtained information from all the subscribers, he said, adding that no bank account or was listed.

The BART computer problem was the latest hack the loosely organized group claimed credit for this year. Anonymous has worldwide adherents to calls from the group to deface and disrupt websites.

Last month, the FBI and British and Dutch officials made 21 arrests, many of them related to the group's attacks on Internet payment provider PayPal Inc., which has been targeted over its refusal to process donations to WikiLeaks. The group also claims credit for disrupting the websites of Visa and MasterCard in December when the credit card companies stopped processing donations to WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange.

The group also claims to have stolen emails from the servers of News Corp., which is the accused of hacking into voicemails of prominent news makers.

Anonymous also threatened on Friday to attack the website of the Fullerton Police Department, which is under fire after a mentally ill homeless man died following a violent confrontation with officers.

Fullerton Police Sgt. Mary Murphy said the department experienced no problems with its website, email system and computer systems after taking "appropriate steps" after Anonymous made its threat.

Allison said that BART's main website was protected from attacks as well.

BART's decision to shut down wireless access was criticized by many as heavy handed, and some raised questions about whether the move violated .

The contretemps began Thursday night when BART officials blocked wireless access to disrupt organization of a demonstration protesting the July 3 shooting death by BART police who said the 45-year-old victim was wielding a knife.

Activists also remain upset by the 2009 death of Oscar Grant, an unarmed black passenger who was shot by a white officer on an Oakland train platform. The officer quit the force and was convicted of involuntary manslaughter after the shooting.

Facing backlash from civil rights advocates and one of its own board members, BART has defended the decision to block cell phone use, with Allison saying the cell phone disruptions were legal because the agency owns the property and infrastructure.

"I'm just shocked that they didn't think about the implications of this. We really don't have the right to be this type of censor," Lynette Sweet, who serves on BART's board of directors, said previously. "In my opinion, we've let the actions of a few people affect everybody. And that's not fair."

BART officials on Sunday were also working a strategy to try to block plans by protesters to try to disrupt service Monday.

"We have been planning for the protests that are said to be shaping up for tomorrow," Allison said. He did not provide specifics, but said BART police will be staffing stations and trains and that the agency had already contacted San Francisco police.

Laura Eichman was among those whose email and home phone number were published by the hackers Sunday.

"I think what they (the hackers) did was illegal and wrong. I work in IT myself, and I think that this was not ethical hacking. I think this was completely unjustified," Eichman said.

She said she doesn't blame BART and feels its action earlier in the week of blocking cell phone service was reasonable.

"It doesn't necessarily keep me from taking BART in the future but I will certainly have to review where I set up accounts and what kind of data I'm going to keep online," Eichman said.

Michael Beekman of San Francisco told the AP that he didn't approve of BART's move to cut cell phone service or the Anonymous posting.

"I'm not paranoid but i feel like it was an invasion of privacy," he said. "I thought I would never personally be involved in any of their (Anonymous') shenanigans."

The group Anonymous, according to its website, does "not tolerate oppression from any ," and it said it was releasing the User Info Database of MyBart.gov as one of many actions to come.

"We apologize to any citizen that has his information published, but you should go to BART and ask them why your information wasn't secure with them. Also do not worry probably the only information that will be abused from this database is that of BART employees," the statement said.

Explore further: Belarus tightens control over online media

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Dutch police investigate apparent hacker attack

Dec 10, 2010

(AP) -- Police said Friday they are investigating if hackers were responsible for taking down websites of police and prosecutors in the Netherlands after the arrest of a 16-year-old for involvement in a cyberattack on several ...

Hacker group declares cyber war on US police

Aug 07, 2011

A hacker group on Saturday claimed it has "defaced and destroyed" websites at scores of US police agencies in retaliation for the arrest of suspected peers accused of hacking into the CIA, British crime agency SOCA, and ...

Recommended for you

Digital dilemma: How will US respond to Sony hack?

6 hours ago

The detective work blaming North Korea for the Sony hacker break-in appears so far to be largely circumstantial, The Associated Press has learned. The dramatic conclusion of a Korean role is based on subtle ...

UN General Assembly OKs digital privacy resolution

9 hours ago

The U.N. General Assembly has approved a resolution demanding better digital privacy protections for people around the world, another response to Edward Snowden's revelations about U.S. government spying.

Online privacy to remain thorny issue: survey

10 hours ago

Online privacy will remain a thorny issue over the next decade, without a widely accepted system that balances user rights and personal data collection, a survey of experts showed Thursday.

Spain: Google News vanishes amid 'Google Tax' spat

Dec 16, 2014

Google on Tuesday followed through with a pledge to shut down Google News in Spain in reaction to a Spanish law requiring news publishers to receive payment for content even if they are willing to give it away.

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Techno1
1 / 5 (5) Aug 15, 2011
It doesn't violate "Free speech" when someone is protecting the normal operation of a business or government.

Your "free speech" doesn't give you the right to screw up the normal operation of government or business, fools.

Get over it.

Anonymous is a terrorist organisation.

They've directly said they don't care if other people are hurt by their actions, including protected witnesses and the families of govt. officials.
epsi00
5 / 5 (2) Aug 15, 2011
If you disagree with a corporation's policies, why hurt its customers? How is this ethical?
David_Wishengrad
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2011
It doesn't violate "Free speech" when someone is protecting the normal operation of a business or government.

Your "free speech" doesn't give you the right to screw up the normal operation of government or business, fools.


You are incorrect. Your free speech gives you the right to defend it, at all cost. This "is" exactly the reason we have the right bare arms. The BART employess that that made decision to cut of speech are lucky to still be breathing. Don't fool yourself. A peaceful protest against repeated crimes seems quite in order.

If everyone took your stand, it would come to killing very quickly. A do not agree with the annonymous statement of, "We do not forgive", and hypocracy is seen in their own words od "We apologize to any citizen that has his information published.." Hypocrites are not fit to lead either.

If you do not like what annoymous is doing, well, I don't blame you. The only thing you have done is promote government and business supression.
poof
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 15, 2011
Dont have a cow man.
antonima
5 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2011
I don't see a problem with the protest. They are protesting the murder of someone in their community, and they have the right to do that. I don't think very many people will get hurt if the transportation website gets taken down or if cellphone usage is shut down at a few BART stations.
Is blocking cell phone communication illegal? I don't know. Is protesting illegal? Not in the US it isn't..
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (1) Aug 15, 2011
Anonymous is indeed a terrorist organization which enjoys flooding websites. So does techno/QC. Are they BOTH compelled by obsessive neuroticism?
I don't think very many people will get hurt if the transportation website gets taken down or if cellphone usage is shut down
This violent flashmob thing has lots of people worried. Phila has just instituted curfews to keep people from getting beaten and stores from being trashed.
Subach
not rated yet Aug 15, 2011
Anarchist, anonymous, alien space invaders... They're all the same to me!
Physmet
3 / 5 (2) Aug 15, 2011

You are incorrect. Your free speech gives you the right to defend it, at all cost.


Really? At any cost? Even putting the safety of others at risk?

That attitude actually says, "I don't like not getting what I want and I will mow down innocent people in order to get my way!" A reasonable person would boycott, protest, go to the media, go to court. An unreasonable person hurts others and hides behind a "cause" for justification.

Free speech is important, but the rights of others are equally important.
ScienceLust
not rated yet Aug 16, 2011
Big brother needs Anonymous. There is no cyber group that is unwatched.Soon porn sites will be able to send cyber cops to your house and take your privacy.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.