Google lawyer slams Apple, Microsoft over patents
August 4, 2011 by Chris Lefkow
The Android logo is displayed during a press event at Google headquarters. Google is currently being sued by software giant Oracle over technology used in its Android smartphone operating system.
Google's top lawyer accused Apple, Oracle, Microsoft and other companies of using "bogus patents" to wage a campaign against the Internet giant's Android mobile platform.
In a blog post, Google senior vice president and chief legal officer David Drummond said Google's rivals were seeking to "make it harder for manufacturers to sell Android devices."
"Instead of competing by building new features or devices, they are fighting through litigation," Drummond said.
He said 550,000 Android devices were being activated every day and its success has resulted in a "hostile, organized campaign against Android by Microsoft, Oracle, Apple and other companies, waged through bogus patents."
Drummond pointed to last year's $450 million acquisition of 882 patents from software maker Novell by a consortium made up Microsoft, Apple, EMC and Oracle and the more recent purchase by a group led by Apple and Microsoft of 6,000 patents held by bankrupt Canadian firm Nortel.
Google was a bidder for the Nortel patent portfolio but it lost out to a $4.5 billion bid from the consortium made up of iPhone maker Apple, EMC, Ericsson, Microsoft, Blackberry maker Research in Motion and Japan's Sony.
The huge sum spent on the patents and the involvement of many of the world's top tech companies reflected the fierce battle for intellectual property in the tech industry, where firms are often hit with patent-infringement lawsuits.
Google is currently being sued by software giant Oracle over technology used in its Android smartphone operating system.
Drummond said Google's rivals were "banding together" and were seeking a $15 licensing fee for every Android device.
He said they were also "attempting to make it more expensive for phone manufacturers to license Android," which Google provides for free to handset makers.
"Patents were meant to encourage innovation, but lately they are being used as a weapon to stop it," Drummond said.
"A smartphone might involve as many as 250,000 (largely questionable) patent claims, and our competitors want to impose a 'tax' for these dubious patents that makes Android devices more expensive for consumers.
"Fortunately, the law frowns on the accumulation of dubious patents for anti-competitive means -- which means these deals are likely to draw regulatory scrutiny, and this patent bubble will pop," he continued.
Drummond said Google was encouraged that the US Justice Department is looking into whether Microsoft and Apple acquired the Nortel patents for "anti-competitive means."
"We're also looking at other ways to reduce the anti-competitive threats against Android by strengthening our own patent portfolio," he said. "We're determined to preserve Android as a competitive choice for consumers, by stopping those who are trying to strangle it."
Microsoft general counsel Brad Smith responded to the Google accusations with a message on his Twitter feed.
"Google says we bought Novell patents to keep them from Google. Really? We asked them to bid jointly with us. They said no," Smith said.
Apple or Oracle did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
13 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
6 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
2
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (22) |
56
|
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
18
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Aug 04, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
See Microsoft's response on this issue. Google was *invited* to join in the consortium to buy the patents. The industry decided to band together and *share* the patents in order to keep them out of the hands of patent trolls and to allow industry growth.
Google didn't want to join the group and get equal access to the Nortel patents, instead they tried very hard to win the patents just for their exclusive use. Google bid *way* more than any single business in the consortium did (over $3B, compared to the combined $4.5B), way more than they would have had to pay had they accepted the offer to make a joint bid for equal access.
I'm sorry Google is not getting a pass from me on this one. They made a huge mistake, they got greedy and failed. Now they are trying to cast themselves as the victim here. Absolute hypocrisy.
Aug 04, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Aug 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The truth is most likely somewhere in the middle. Hard to tell though where the middle is...
Aug 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
They said that they invited Google to join in and share. Google rejected the offer to cooperate and tried to take them all for itself. Google bid over $3B, the largest individual contribution was from Apple at $2.6B.
Because there was no cooperation, there was a bidding war, had Google been willing to share when invited to, the total price would have been far lower than the $4.5B, and Google's cost to share in all the patents would have been far, far lower than the $3B they bid for exclusive use.
Google was the patent troll in this case. Now they are crying victim. It's a bit shameful.
Aug 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
http://www.washin...deo.html