Explorers scramble to build vessel that will reach Earth's deepest point

August 23, 2011 By Hannah Dreier

It's been more than 50 years since humanity ventured to the deepest place on Earth, but four crews now are racing to make a return trip.

One of the futuristic crafts in the works comes courtesy of Graham Hawkes. For years his minisubmarine, which resembles an underwater fighter jet, has sat in a bare concrete room in Point Richmond, Calif.

This fall, it is destined for a muddy gorge in the Mariana Trench, the world's deepest known point, 36,000 feet below the surface of the Pacific Ocean near Guam.

Hawkes is in good company in the pursuit of what many think will be the next big thing in : manned submersibles that can maneuver through the crushing pressure at the bottom of the world.

"Avatar" director James Cameron is closing in with a team in Australia, and Florida-based Triton Submarines also is in the hunt. Another hopeful, scientist Sylvia Earle, is rounding out the pack with a kind of hovering deep sea space station, which her Alameda-based company promises will become a "world asset."

No one has visited the craggy, frigid spot seven miles below the surface known as Challenger Deep since 1960, when two divers plunged to the bottom in U.S. Navy's Trieste, a specially designed, deep-diving research vessel.

The challenge at the time was figuring out how to withstand pressures at the bottom of the sea - 1,000 times what we experience on land. Under those conditions, the slightest crack or weakness in a vessel spells instant death for anyone inside.

The Trieste's response was a hull reinforced with thick steel walls. The heavy craft used a traditional ballast system: Take water in to sink, release it to rise. Without the possibility of lateral motion, the two divers spent 20 minutes at the bottom of the world surrounded by their own sediment cloud.

The next explorers hope to take a look around.

A convergence of technological leaps - from ultra-strong materials to lightweight batteries - has rekindled interest in exploring this black world where photosynthesis doesn't happen.

British-born Hawkes has been at it the longest. His craft, the DeepFlight Challenger, is "a few weeks away" from seaworthiness, while his competitors are still in design and testing stages.

Hawkes thinks the sub would have already set the solo record and be sitting in the Smithsonian if not for the untimely death of its original owner, uber-adventurer Steve Fossett, in 2007.

As it happened, the Challenger languished until this past spring. That's when Virgin impresario Sir Richard Branson and his colleague Chris Welsh announced that they had bought the $5 million craft and would soon be taking it on an "epic adventure." It is Welsh who is set to make the historic dive to the Mariana Trench.

If conventional submarines are like elevators or hot-air balloons, Hawkes' subs, which replace heavy steel with carbon fiber and titanium, are like fighter jets. With elongated fuselages and fixed wings, they use the same principles as an airplane - or, as Hawkes points out, a flippered sea creature.

The Triton team, which also announced in the spring that it was jumping into "the race to inner space," is using an entirely different but equally appealing analogy - the crystal ball.

"Our vehicle is completely transparent," Triton President Patrick Lahey said. "It is the cleanest, most elegant solution for the deep ocean."

The $15 million sealed glass sphere can carry as many as three people straight down to the bottom of the ocean.

Triton hopes to popularize deep sea tourism. Lahey imagines that the exotic marine denizens of the abyss one day will keep company with packs of hedge fund managers and thrill-seeking scions.

Cameron, meanwhile, has revealed that he is working on an $8 million steel craft that he plans to pilot to the trench. He has written in Wired Magazine that he was "infected by the deep-sea-exploration virus" during the filming of "Titanic."

Taking a more conventional path to the deeps is Sylvia Earle, a longtime Oakland, Calif., resident who is Hawkes' ex-wife. She has the enviable title of "explorer in residence" at the National Geographic Society.

With funding from Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt, Earle's company is designing a blimplike craft with cameras and robotic arms that will be able to stop and float in the depths. At $40 million, it costs more than three times as much as the other contenders.

Although Earle will most likely pilot the craft, the project is intended as a resource for many scientists.

While others seek profits, adventure and scientific discoveries, Hawkes is hoping that the race to the deep will usher in the era of "flying" subs.

"It is the pointy end of the spear that will pierce open the realm of possibility," he said.

Hawkes, 63, pioneered the idea of deep sea sightseeing with the DeepFlight Super Falcon, which he sold to Bay Area venture capitalist Tom Perkins in 2008 and promptly replicated for himself.

The soft-spoken engineer billed the Falcon as "the first fully productionized submersible capable of sub-sea flight." So far, however, few researchers or well-heeled adventurers have come knocking.

Today, the sleek craft sits just beyond the mirrored double doors of Hawkes' cluttered Point Richmond headquarters, in the space you might expect to meet a receptionist.

While his peers acknowledge his genius for technological innovation, some also dismiss Hawkes as a monomaniac working on the fringes of the profession.

Soaring in the ocean may be cool, but if you're a scientist, what you really want to do is stop and hover.

"I love Graham's vision of flight," Earle said. "He's been smitten with the idea of flying in the ocean. But as a scientist, I need to be able to pause when I want to, to stay for minutes or hours."

Her craft will allow scientists to linger, as opposed to performing what she dismissively called "bounce dives" and "fly-throughs."

Other researchers spurn the notion of manned deep sea exploration altogether.

Chris Harrold, director of conservation research at the Monterey Bay Aquarium, has been to 19,000 feet in a safe, "workhorse" sub and has no desire to go deeper.

"Going down into a submersible to tropic depth is one thing," he said. "There's light, there's stuff to see, you're not freezing cold. Go deeper and most of the time you're in blackness."

There is little scientific incentive to risk lives when robots can do the job just was well, Harrold said, though he acknowledged that "there's this human spirit thing that we need to get a person down there."

The Hawkes, Cameron and Triton teams are pursuing the business model of the jet industry.

Hawkes offers $15,000, three-day underwater flight courses that regularly sell out, and he recently took the Falcon to Jordan at the request of the Royal Hashemite Court.

Ultimately, the best defense of the race to the deep may be sentimental, rather than scientific.

The exploration of our planet, Hawkes believes, is a fundamentally human endeavor. He expects his submersibles will one day float among the million-dollar yachts moored outside his fog-shrouded studio - not because of their commercial or scientific potential, but because of the allure of the unknown.

That is one point upon which all those racing to the deep can agree.

"We don't climb mountains halfway," Earle said. "There is no other place where we have access to where life exists with 16,000 pounds of pressure on it. How can we resist wanting to see who lives there?"

GRAHAM HAWKES' CLAIMS TO FAME

-Holds the record for deepest solo ocean dive with a 3,000-foot plunge he took while testing his Deep Rover submersible.

-Featured in the Dan Brown novel "Deception Point" as a "genius sub designer."

-Piloted one of his own crafts for a cameo as a henchman in the James Bond film "For Your Eyes Only."

-Has found more than 350 shipwrecks.

(c) 2011, Contra Costa Times (Walnut Creek, Calif.).
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

GSwift7
Aug 23, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
What a cool article. I like the way it focuses on the people and gives a little mini-bio on each of the key people.

While his peers acknowledge his genius for technological innovation, some also dismiss Hawkes as a monomaniac working on the fringes of the profession


uh...

British-born Hawkes has been at it the longest. His craft, the DeepFlight Challenger, is "a few weeks away" from seaworthiness, while his competitors are still in design and testing stages


speechless here.
Jeddy_Mctedder
Aug 23, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
this is ridiculous. why manned? we've abandoned the shuttle . manned is the past.

with ALL THE UNMANNED AND AUTONOMOUS SOFTWARE AND WORKERS OUT THERE.....
it is too much to ask nasa or some enterprising person to figure out how to put a fully autonomous vehicle down the trench with a goal of not bumping into rocks and of observing motion, tracking moving things with a camera, and then moving onto to new moving things after a while?

the vehicle could be designed to be flooded and to use electronics that are designed to function in wet environments.
no massive diferences in pressure.
ChiefOfGxBxL
Aug 23, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Manned is not over, and it will not be for as long as humans have the aspiration to explore. The shuttle program was ended to stop doing the same thing over; now, NASA is aimed at deep-space exploration using American private-sector vehicles. We may use robots to help us with difficult tasks, but that is followed up by actual manned initiatives. Otherwise, how can we call ourselves human?
Nik_2213
Aug 23, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Uh, don't forget that the Chinese are in this race, too...
antialias_physorg
Aug 24, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
this is ridiculous. why manned?

Maybe because it's easier to send a signal into space to remote control stuff on Mars than it is to send a signal through 7 miles of water?

Anyways. Space is too cotly to do anything in (and we still haven't figured out what we actually want to do there if we do decide to go). The oceans, on the other hand, offer real possibilities

- ocean floor mining
- ocean farming
- subaquatic living space
- geothermal energy (the crust is less thick in the iceans than on land)
- hydro energy from deep ocean streams
- ... and last but not least: at least we know that there is something there to look at.
GSwift7
Aug 24, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Maybe because it's easier to send a signal into space to remote control stuff on Mars than it is to send a signal through 7 miles of water?

Anyways. Space is too cotly to do anything in (and we still haven't figured out what we actually want to do there if we do decide to go). The oceans, on the other hand, offer real possibilities


Yep, I couldn't have said it better myself. There are vast resources available to the nation who can tap them at the seafloor. The Chinese understand that, as someone above said.

Notice how the private companies can do this for one quarter the price of the government/university effort? That's why we will beat China, despite getting a late start.
Rank 4 /5 (2 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue

UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.

Space & Earth / Environment

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.7 / 5 (7) | comments 39

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (13) | comments 38

Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)

The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (10) | comments 19

What's the big deal about private space launches?

(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (6) | comments 35


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...