Earth's oldest fossils boost hopes for life on Mars

Aug 21, 2011
A 3D reconstruction of a 3.4 billion-year-old microfossil about 10 micrometers in diameter from Western Australia (L). Cross sections through the reconstruction (R) emphasize the spheroidal nature of this ancient cell. According to a study published in "Nature Geoscience", microfossils were discovered in a 3.4 billion-year-old sandstone at the base of of Strelley Pool in western Australia.

(PhysOrg.com) -- Microfossils found in Australia show that more than 3.4 billion years ago, bacteria thrived on an Earth that had no oxygen, a finding that boosts hopes life has existed on Mars, a study published Sunday says.

The Earth’s oldest fossils have been found in Australia by a team from the University of Western Australia and Oxford University. The microscopic fossils show convincing evidence for cells and bacteria living in an oxygen-free world over 3.4 billion years ago.

The team, led by Dr David Wacey of the University of Western Australia and including Professor Martin Brasier of Oxford University, report the finding in the journal Nature Geoscience.

‘At last we have good solid evidence for life over 3.4 billion years ago. It confirms there were bacteria at this time, living without oxygen,’ says Professor Brasier of the Department of Earth Sciences at Oxford.

The Earth was still a hot, violent place at this time, with volcanic activity dominating the early Earth. The sky was cloudy and grey, keeping the heat in despite the sun being weaker than today. The water temperature of the oceans was much higher at 40-50 degrees – the temperature of a hot bath – and circulating currents were very strong. Any land masses were small, or about the size of Caribbean islands, and the tidal range was huge.

Significantly, there was very little oxygen present as there were no plants or algae yet to photosynthesise and produce oxygen. The new evidence points to early life being sulphur-based, living off and metabolising compounds containing sulphur rather than oxygen for energy and growth.

‘Such bacteria are still common today. Sulphur bacteria are found in smelly ditches, soil, hot springs, hydrothermal vents – anywhere where there’s little free oxygen and they can live off organic matter,’ explains Professor Brasier.

Earth's oldest fossils boost hopes for life on Mars
Fossils of microscopic cells from 3.4 billion years ago. Credit: Oxford University

The microfossils were found in a remote part of Western Australia called Strelley Pool. They are very well preserved between the quartz sand grains of the oldest beach or shoreline known on Earth, in some of the oldest sedimentary rocks that can be found anywhere.

‘We can be very sure about the age as the rocks were formed between two volcanic successions that narrow the possible age down to a few tens of millions of years,’ says Professor Brasier. ‘That’s very accurate indeed when the rocks are 3.4 billion years old.’

The microfossils satisfy three crucial tests that the forms seen in the rocks are biological and have not occurred through some mineralisation process.

The fossils are very clearly preserved showing precise cell-like structures all of a similar size. They look like well known but much newer microfossils from 2 billion years ago, and are not odd or strained in shape.

The fossils suggest biological-like behaviour. The cells are clustered in groups, are only present in appropriate habitats and are found attached to sand grains.

And crucially, they show biological metabolisms. The chemical make-up of the tiny fossilised structures is right, and crystals of pyrite (fool’s gold) associated with the microfossils are very likely to be by-products of the sulphur metabolism of these ancient cells and bacteria.

Early fossils of life on Earth has been a controversial area. In the past decade, the barriers that need to be overcome before claiming such evidence have been raised significantly, aided by new techniques for mapping the chemistry of rocks at fine scales.

In 2002, the same Oxford group suggested well-known microfossils from the Apex chert in Australia were not the preserved forms of ancient bacteria after all. They argued that the context, shape and mineralogy of the forms were all wrong for them to be of biological origin.

They believe the current fossils, found just 20 miles away, satisfy all criteria for judging such finds.

The researchers are now using the techniques and approaches they used in this study to re-examine other fossil finds that have been proposed to contain evidence for life on Earth at these extremely early times.

‘We’re now making detailed comparisons with all other early microfossils, and we’re very optimistic for future finds,’ says Professor Brasier.

The work also has implications for looking for life on other planets, giving an indication of what evidence for such life might look like.

Should there be life elsewhere in our solar system – on Mars or on the moons of Titan or Europa – it is likely to be similar sorts of bacteria and cells living in similar environments. So any fossils in rocks from these planets and moons ought to look like these Australian microfossils and pass the same evidence tests.

‘Could these sorts of things exist on Mars? It’s just about conceivable,’ says Professor Brasier. ‘But it would need these approaches – mapping the chemistry of any microfossils in fine detail and convincing three-dimensional images – to support any evidence for life on Mars.’

Explore further: The mysteries of Antarctic sea ice

Provided by University of Oxford

4.9 /5 (18 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Oldest fossils ever found may not be fossils after all

Feb 21, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A rock formation in Western Australia was the site of great excitement a couple of decades ago when it revealed evidence of the oldest fossils of bacteria ever found, but a new study casts ...

Study reveals ancient rocks linked to old Earth's crust

Feb 24, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new geological study which took place in the Pilbara region of Western Australia brings us one step closer to understanding more precisely the timing of when the primordial earth crust was ...

Australia's ancient oceans: toxic and purple

Oct 06, 2005

Ancient oceans in Australia’s north were toxic seas of sulfur, supporting coloured bacteria that made the seas appear purple and unlike anything we know of in the Earth’s history, according to new ANU research.

Recommended for you

Tropical Storm Genevieve forms in Eastern Pacific

Jul 25, 2014

The seventh tropical depression of the Eastern Pacific Ocean formed and quickly ramped up to a tropical storm named "Genevieve." NOAA's GOES-West satellite captured an infrared image of the newborn storm ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

NickFun
1.7 / 5 (3) Aug 21, 2011
I think the evidence for life on Mars is already pretty conclusive.
jsa09
5 / 5 (3) Aug 21, 2011
@nick It is? Conclusive is a strong word.

To the article 3.4 billion year old fossils - from when earth was hot plus no oxygen and if you saw it from up close you might say
"nice place to visit but would not want to live there."

I do wonder how much further back we will be able to find fossils of anything and that is not to say that life may not have been on this planet a long time before the first ever fossil.
Vendicar_Decarian
3.2 / 5 (9) Aug 21, 2011
These fossils are just a byproduct of the neutron-neutron repulsion in the iron neutron star that is our sun.

I'm sure of it.

If only astronomers could see the stars, it would be clear to them.

cyberCMDR
5 / 5 (2) Aug 21, 2011
@Vendicar: I think you need to get back on your medication.
sherriffwoody
not rated yet Aug 22, 2011
God must have made earth earlier than we think if this is the case. It must have taken him longer to create humans than the bible says.
Vendicar_Decarian
3.2 / 5 (6) Aug 22, 2011
God was stoned on heroin when he created the universe. His sense of time was not what it should have been.
kevinrtrs
1 / 5 (13) Aug 22, 2011
So how did they determine the age of the sedimentary rock since it's constituents could have come from all over the place, carrying material with differing radioactive history with it?
The assumption of 3.4 billion years is highly questionable here. Even more so would be the use of index fossils to date the sandstone.
So by the way - did anyone think to do C14 dating on these microbes? That would certainly open the eyes as to whether 3.4 billion years was reasonable.

Then to further extrapolate to Mars is really laughable. What do they expect life on Mars to look like? Just like life on earth? So what happens when they find such microbes on Mars? How are they going to know it's not from Earth?
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (3) Aug 22, 2011
So how did they determine the age of the sedimentary rock

For that age bracket it's usually zircon dating.

So by the way - did anyone think to do C14 dating on these microbes?

No. C14 dating is applicable to about 60000 years ago. These fossils do not contain any organic matter which would be use for C14 dating, anyways.
Ethelred
5 / 5 (4) Aug 22, 2011
Kevin

Anytime a Creationist wants to pay for the C14 testing they can do so. The reason they don't is because the answers would show the world is to old for them to want to know the answers.

So find a fossil, say a dinosaur, and have it tested for C14. Intentionally using a contaminated fossil, that was in a burning building for instance, would produce bogus results and could be an intentional effort to produce results that have no actual relationship to the age of the fossil. Which is why the fossil will have to a have a reliable provenance.

However the US has LOTS of dinosaur fossils you can have tested. They are all supposed to be over 65MYs old so please put your money where your fingers are.

Ethelred
KiltBiker
5 / 5 (2) Aug 22, 2011
Kevin if you had read the article before responding you could have answered your own question...
"We can be very sure about the age as the rocks were formed between two volcanic successions that narrow the possible age down to a few tens of millions of years, says Professor Brasier. Thats very accurate indeed when the rocks are 3.4 billion years old."
Y8Q412VBZP21010
5 / 5 (6) Aug 22, 2011
Oh why pick on Kevin? He shows up, issues his standard creotosh, and walks off. I suppose he gets his gigglies out of it but other than that, and providing amusement for people in giving him 1-star votes, it amounts to nothing.

I don't even read his postings any more, they're so whiny, I just ding him and move on.