Exciting discovery about the origin of humans
(PhysOrg.com) -- A major evolutionary biological study, performed partly by researchers at Uppsala University, reveals what has driven the evolution of new forms of life. The study also shows how such a complex life form as the human being could emerge. The findings are being published in the scientific journal Science.
By looking at and comparing the genomes of humans, mice, cows, and two types of fish, these researchers were able to discern general patterns in what led to the emergence of new life forms in different time periods. They have also found what lies behind the evolution of the complexity and diversity of mammals.
In the period when mammals evolved, some 100 million years ago, it turns out that genes that govern signals between cells were of great importance. Genes that alter proteins and make other molecules like sugar or phosphorous bind to proteins were also important. These findings surprised the scientists.
We didnt really know that it was so important in evolutionary terms for us humans, so this is an exciting discovery that can have a great impact on future research, says Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, professor at the Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology and one of the authors of the study.
What makes humans such complex organisms is thus not only how our organs were formed and developed but also the signals and advanced modifications of proteins that take place in our body. The complexity of a human being, with many organs that work together and an advanced brain, is thus something that nature has enabled with efficient signal routes and multiple protein modifications. This, according to Kerstin Lindblad-Toh, indicates that scientists should look more at protein modifications to understand what makes us functioning human being/organisms.
This will also provide us with key information about how evolutionary pressure affects the emergence of diseases, and not only what proteins are involved but also what protein modifications are required for normal functioning.
Provided by
Uppsala University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
19 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
18 hours ago |
3.3 / 5 (18) |
56
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (26)
How do they know this? Were they there? Was there someone there to observe and record this particular growth event?
NO.
Therefore this is simply crass guesstimation and assumption on their part. Evolution from a single ancestor never happened - we know enough about chemistry, biological processes and make-up as well as probability to figure out that evolution [from one single ancestor organism into all multiple life-forms ] is impossible.
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (16)
Which do you think might be the more credible?
You should really consider another way of earning a living.-One in which you wont have the need to peddle such obvious lies as these. Have you no self-respect man?
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (16)
Just like the shysters who know full well that their snake oil is turpentine and spices.
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
/God
Aug 22, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Hi Otto, sorry, I accidentally clicked a 1-star on this comment when I intended a 5. Apologies.
Aug 23, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Aug 23, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
Aug 24, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
So when was that Flood Kevin and who recorded it. I will have to take a failure to answer as a sign that you don't have any such evidence and thus I must ask why do you believe whatever the hell it is that you do believe? What evidence supports that belief?
Ethelred
Aug 26, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
It's just a shame that the Darwiniac flashmob can't recognize their own religiosity.
Aug 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Inheritance is not presumed, but tested against the alternative hypotheses that random events could duplicate the same distribution. Such alternatives are readily rejected for their mathematical implausibility.
Funnily enough, the distribution of inheritable traits as actually evidence of inheritance.
Sep 01, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
So on the off chance that you do stick around how about you answer me these questions three.
When was the Flood?
Why don't see evidence in the genetic testing that humans had just one single male ancestor from whenever you think that the Great Flood actually occurred?
If Evolution is the crock you claim why are there megatons of fossils from long ago and why doesn't the genetic evidence agree with you in any way?
Ethelred
Sep 01, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (7)
Seven days of creation from nothing is more plausible?
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Not to be a bother but... we have our big bang, we're not really sure what was there before it either... so how is that different then 7 days or a day or a few seconds?
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
So did you have a point?
Ethelred
Sep 08, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
http://www.physor...ion.html
Are you going to discuss it THIS time. You said you would last time and then you ran.
Ethelred
Oct 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Oh I'm sorry about that, I was watching some propaganda and just resiting. I've learned to keep an open mind.. hopefully you can do that too, and realize people DO change, and change is good, mmmhmm :)
The one thing I can say is, that we know a lot less than we think we do. And thinking the opposite leads to arrogance, more than anything else!
Oct 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
The researchers made extrapolitions on the basis of 29 critter's DNA. That's maybe what - .05% of the number of mammals on the planet? And a much smaller percentage when you consider the TOTAL number of creatures in existance on our little speck of dirt.
However, like little kids learning about stuff in their environment, we like to show everyone else what we've learned - making the assumption that we now know most everything there is to know on a subject...
No wonder the aliens have decided to give us a little more time before they show up...:-)