Budget deficit, weak spending, politics making it hard to get economy going

Aug 16, 2011 By Lloyd B. Thomas Jr.

A Kansas State University economist says the government is running out of options when it comes to stimulating the weak economy and holding off a second double-dip recession since the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

"The federal government normally has two tools to use in an effort to ameliorate a very weak economy: fiscal policy and monetary policy. Unfortunately, neither of these tools appear likely to resolve our situation," said Lloyd B. Thomas Jr., K-State professor of economics and the author of the book "The Financial Crisis and Federal Reserve Policy," recently published by Palgrave Macmillan.

Thomas said the economy has still not recovered from the severity of the 2007-2009 recession, and he added that the outlook for recovery isn't promising right now because of low consumption spending, investment spending and government purchases -- or aggregate spending, a main driver in .

" is weak right now because household wealth has been hammered by the decline in home prices -- with one-third of households with mortgages now having negative equity in their homes; by the decline in the stock market and retirement accounts; by the decline in ; and by very high unemployment," Thomas said.

Investment spending is weak since firms are reluctant to expand operations because people aren't buying their goods and services. New construction, also considered investment spending, is extremely weak, largely because of the glut of repossessed homes on the market. And government purchases are weak as state and local governments are forced to retrench because of the decline in their revenues, Thomas said.

"Spending by the federal government is inhibited by political considerations stemming from the huge , which is largely the result of the enormous that began in 2007," he said.

According to Thomas, conventional fiscal policy would involve large tax cuts and expansion of government expenditures to boost aggregate . However, fear that the United States could follow European countries into a sovereign debt crisis, coupled with political forces in Washington, have taken a needed additional fiscal stimulus off the table, he said.

When it comes to monetary policy, Thomas said the Federal Reserve has essentially exhausted its ammunition. The Fed announced Aug. 9 that it would continue to keep interest rates as low as possible.

"The Fed has maintained its short-term interest rate near zero since December 2008, and has taken several measures to try to push the long-term interest rate as low as possible," Thomas said. "Today, the 10-year Treasury bond yield is near 2 percent -- the lowest rate in 60 years. In short, the Fed is out of bullets."

Thomas said the fear that we may be in for a lengthy period of economic stagnation, coupled with the gridlock in government, is driving the volatility in the stock market.

"Investors are contemplating the possibility of a lengthy period of economic stagnation: slow or negative growth and very high unemployment," he said. "Because both monetary and fiscal policy are essentially immobilized today, the economic outlook is precarious and indeed frightening."

Thomas' research interests include monetary economics, macroeconomic policy and international monetary economics. His work has appeared in leading journals, including The Economic Record, Business Economics, Southern Economic Journal, Journal of Economic Perspectives and more.

Explore further: Narcissistic CEOs and financial performance

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Narcissistic CEOs and financial performance

Jul 24, 2014

Narcissism, considered by some as the "dark side of the executive personality," may actually be a good thing when it comes to certain financial measures, with companies led by narcissistic CEOs outperforming those helmed ...

Drugmaker GSK slashes annual profits forecast

Jul 23, 2014

British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline on Wednesday slashed its 2014 profits forecast as second-quarter earnings sank on the back of weak US trade, adverse currency moves and a Chinese bribery probe.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3432682
3 / 5 (2) Aug 16, 2011
We are now Europe. 40% of GDP is government spending. Another 20% of GDP is the cost of regulations. What did we think was going to happen? The total cost of government, on a per-household basis, it about $78,000. The median household income is about $50,000.
COCO
5 / 5 (1) Aug 18, 2011
listen to Ron Paul - stop the wars - and destroy the Fed. Legalize Liberty.
ryggesogn2
1 / 5 (1) Aug 18, 2011
It's too bad the professor didn't address the job killing regulations.
"Exxon Mobil Corp. sued the U.S. Interior Department, asking a judge to set aside the agencys decision to cancel offshore leases that may yield billions of barrels of oil."
http://www.bloomb...ses.html
"There is no resolution yet on a proposed $7 billion Canadian-U.S. oil pipeline, as President Obama has continued to delay his decision on whether to approve it. Before the construction and operation of TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline expansion can progress, the President, through the U.S. State Departments permitting process, must grant final approval an approval which has been in political limbo for the past three years."
http://www.thenew...or-china
This is only two of hundreds of job killing regulations from this regime.