# Basketball shot selection analyzed mathematically

##### August 5, 2011 by Lin Edwards report

In the sport of basketball players are constantly faced with the choice of whether to shoot for the hoop when a shot opportunity arises or to hold on to the ball and hope a better opportunity will arise. Now a theoretical physicist from the University of Minnesota in the US has analyzed the problem mathematically and determined the best strategy.

Graduate student Brian Skinner decided to analyze basketball shot selection after hearing about traffic flow research that reached the unexpected conclusion that average commuting time could be reduced by road closures that force drivers to travel by routes they would otherwise avoid in order to try to minimize their own commuting time. The traffic flow diagrams reminded Skinner, an enthusiastic fan of basketball, of diagrams of the flow of in a game. The surprising conclusion also reminded him of a basketball theory named after Patrick Ewing, a high-scoring basketball player. When the games of Ewing’s team were analyzed it was discovered that the team won more games if the big-scoring Ewing was absent.

Skinner realized that most of the mathematical equations and variables used in analyzing traffic flow could also be applicable to and the movement of the ball in the game. His analysis, published at arXiv.org, concentrated on the movement of the ball as it approached the hoop.

Skinner’s model aimed to find out how likely the shot is to go in before the player should make the shot. Shots more likely to go in were classed as higher quality shots, and the model assumed that the quality of shot opportunities falls randomly.

The mathematical model demonstrated the optimal strategy for scoring the maximum points is for the team to take their time and concentrate on making high quality shots as long as there is sufficient time remaining for the shot. The model also concluded that a team playing a faster game and having twice the shot opportunities of its rival should not have double the shooting rate, but taking more time and being more selective about which shots to take would give them the biggest advantage. So, for example, if the slower team shoots at an average rate of 20 seconds, the team playing twice as fast should not shoot every 10 seconds but should take an extra three seconds on average, giving a shooting rate of 13 seconds.

Explore further: Analyzing Effects Of Hoops Ball Hog

## Related Stories

#### Analyzing Effects Of Hoops Ball Hog

March 17, 2010

Fans will have noticed that when a basketball team's best player sits out for a while the team will sometimes actually do better than when the star is playing. Concepts from the mathematical science called game theory help ...

#### Best 'sweet spots' on the backboard

March 10, 2011

According to Larry Hunter, the act of banking a basketball off the backboard and into the hoop is becoming a lost art.

#### Nothing But Net: The Physics of Free-Throw Shooting

November 4, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Pay attention, Shaq: Two North Carolina State University engineers have figured out the best way to shoot a free throw - a frequently underappreciated skill that gets more important as the game clock winds ...

#### The Science Of Streaky Shooting

May 17, 2010

Players, coaches, commentators and fans believe in streaky shooting, but universal assumptions are not always true.

#### New technique developed to evaluate basketball players

June 5, 2009

A team of Spanish and American researchers has developed a method to evaluate basketball players that will, they say, better meet the requirements of the sport's trainers and experts. The technique uses mathematical models ...

#### Brain Scans Track Hoop Fans' Happy Memories

February 9, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- In a novel study that used historical tape of a thrilling overtime basketball game between Duke and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, brain researchers at Duke have found that fans remember ...

## Recommended for you

#### Money can buy happiness but it's costly to bank on that without measuring debt

October 26, 2016

Yes, money can lead to happiness, but how much debt one has should also be considered in the money-happiness equation, according to a new a study from Purdue University.

#### Upper Paleolithic humans may have hunted cave lions for their pelts

October 26, 2016

Upper Paleolithic humans may have hunted cave lions for their pelts, perhaps contributing to their extinction, according to a study published October 26, 2016 in the open-access journal PLOS ONE by Marián Cueto from the ...

#### Ancient parrot fossil found in Siberia

October 26, 2016

(Phys.org)—A Russian paleontologist has discovered a parrot fossil uncovered in Siberia several years ago—the first evidence of parrots living in Asia. In his paper published in Biology Letters, Nikita Zelenkov describes ...

#### Ancient burials suggestive of blood feuds

October 24, 2016

There is significant variation in how different cultures over time have dealt with the dead. Yet, at a very basic level, funerals in the Sonoran Desert thousands of years ago were similar to what they are today. Bodies of ...

#### Dinosaurs of a feather flock and die together?

October 24, 2016

In the paleontology popularity contest, studying the social life of dinosaurs is on the rise.

#### Model helps explore how changing certainty in belief of one statement can lead to changings belief in truth of others

October 21, 2016

A small team of researchers with members from the U.S., the Netherlands, Russia and Italy has developed a new model that illuminates how changing the degree of certainty a person holds for a given belief can lead to changes ...

##### Nikola
5 / 5 (1) Aug 05, 2011
Maybe they should analyze what kind of silly face is necessary to make the shot.
##### rwinners
not rated yet Aug 05, 2011
Of course they do. Athletes, from golfers to football players store stimulation to complex situations as experiences. Repetition of these situations probably stimulates a very fast reactions. Seems to be done on a very micro level, too.
##### ProfSLW
not rated yet Aug 06, 2011
This is a macro-analysis. The other side of the issue is micro: for each player, where on the court does s/he have the best shooting percentage? Indeed, if one did this for (let's say) 50 players, one could then do a meta-analysis to see whether IN GENERAL there are higher percentage shots from different parts of the court. For instance, if one shoots somewhat in front of the basket, any very long shot would bank into the basket -- something that doesn't happen if shooting from the side of the court. In this case, one would expect a higher overall percentage for shots from "the foul line / top of the key" compared to the baseline.