Australia's Antarctic claim 'at risk'

Aug 08, 2011
Australia claims sovereignty over 42 percent of Antarctica
This undated handout photo released in 2010 by the Mawsons' Huts Foundation shows Commonwealth Bay, in the Australian Antarctic Territory. Australia holds the largest claim to Antarctica but risks losing it in any race to unlock the frozen continent's potentially vast mineral and energy resources, an influential thinktank has said.

Australia holds the largest claim to Antarctica but risks losing it in any race to unlock the frozen continent's potentially vast mineral and energy resources, an influential thinktank said Monday.

With global interest in the icy southern region growing, the Lowy Institute has warned Canberra against complacency when it comes to its claim, which covers 42 percent of Antarctica, an area roughly three-quarters the size of Australia.

"Australia has limited presence and capability, and positions its policy in terms of science and environmental management rather than national security," Lowy's national security fellow Ellie Fogarty said in a paper.

"This raises questions about its ability to preserve its sovereignty claim."

A bans resource exploitation in Antarctica but the prohibition becomes reviewable in 2048, and some states may then decide to withdraw from it given the continent's .

These include coal seams, manganese, iron and uranium, while Antarctica's forecast oil reserves are estimated as among the largest in the world after Saudi Arabia and Venezuela.

Fogarty argues that Australia cannot adequately patrol its claim, lacking the kind of ski-planes it needs to reach some areas and without an ice-breaking ship in the region.

In addition, a recently opened airbase near Australia's Casey Station and the leasing of a wheeled Airbus 319 for intercontinental flights has not been as successful as hoped, because the plane is unable to bring in heavy equipment and is often diverted to land at the American McMurdo base in New Zealand-claimed territory.

At the same time, other nations such as Russia and China are unapologetically increasing their efforts in Antarctica, including in the 5,800,000 square kilometre Australian Antarctic Territory (AAT).

"There are even reports that Kunlun Station, established on the AAT's Dome Argus, features a sign stating 'Welcome to China,' implying Chinese territoriality and denial of Australia's claim," the Lowy paper said.

"Antarctica: Assessing and Protecting Australia's National Interests" urges Canberra to push for international inspections of all other nations' stations and the modernisation of Canberra's three outposts.

Australia is one of seven nations that have claimed territory in Antarctica. It established the first permanent base on the continent at Mawson in 1954.

Explore further: Long-term warming, short-term variability: Why climate change is still an issue

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Antarctic Telescope High On Australian New Wishlist

Jun 24, 2005

Astronomers hope to kick-start their long-running push to build a telescope in Antarctica in the latest 10-year plan for Australian astronomy. A draft version of the so-called decadal plan will be discussed at the annual sci ...

Drought in SW Australia linked to snowfall in Antarctica

Feb 07, 2010

A drought that has gripped the southwestern corner of Australia since the 1970s is linked with higher snowfall in East Antarctica, a phenomenon that may be rooted in global warming, scientists reported on ...

Recommended for you

Bangladeshi, South Korean climbers die on Everest

5 hours ago

A climber from Bangladesh and another from South Korea have died on Mount Everest as hundreds flock to the world's highest peak during good weather, Nepalese tourism officials said Tuesday.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Techno1
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2011
"A global treaty bans resource exploitation in Antarctica but the prohibition becomes reviewable in 2048"

Right. Anything that makes sense gets banned.

Let's see:

A) Destroy environments where things actually...live...while we harvest resources, such as the Gulf of Mexico and the remainder of the tropics...

or

B) Destroy an environment where almost nothing lives anyway...

Ah, what the hell, let's go with A...
Ojorf
2.3 / 5 (3) Aug 08, 2011
B) Destroy an environment where almost nothing lives anyway...


There is a lot living there you, you, you ... vertebrate-centric! :)

More news stories

Study shows where scene context happens in our brain

In a remote fishing community in Venezuela, a lone fisherman sits on a cliff overlooking the southern Caribbean Sea. This man –– the lookout –– is responsible for directing his comrades on the water, ...

Green conversion of heat to electricity

Soon, it will be possible to produce electricity from heat over 30 degrees emitted from a waste incinerator, refinery, or data processor. The start-up Osmoblue has just confirmed the feasibility of this new ...