WWII shipwrecks could threaten US coast

Jul 17, 2011 By Frank D. Roylance, The Baltimore Sun

On the evening of Feb. 2, 1942, an unarmed tanker with 66,000 barrels of crude oil on board was steaming in the Atlantic, about 90 miles off Ocean City, Md. Without warning, it was struck by German torpedoes. The attack set the W.L. Steed ablaze, and sank it; only a handful of the crew of 38 survived.

As unfolded, the Germans had moved part of their sub pack west to attack shipping along the coast. By the time the Nazis withdrew the subs in July to focus on convoys crossing the North Atlantic, they had sunk 397 ships in U.S. .

That wartime legacy has become a new , raising concern about leaks from the W.L. Steed's sunken fuel bunkers and cargo - and from many others like it.

The is taking an inventory of more than 30,000 coastal shipwrecks - some of them casualties of the 1942 Battle of the Atlantic - and identifying those that pose the most significant threat.

"We're starting to see significant corrosion. Vessels that weren't totally torpedoed didn't break apart and may have intact fuel tanks," NOAA's Lisa C. Symons said.

It's not just the ship's own fuel bunkers, either. Many, like the W.L. Steed, sank with holds filled with crude oil, fuel oil, and explosives. Leaks of those products "could devastate coastal communities and coastal environments," Symons said.

So far, the worst-threat list has been narrowed to 233 vessels, said Symons, damage assessment and resource protection coordinator for NOAA's National Marine Sanctuaries office in Silver Spring.

The final list will be submitted by year's end to the Coast Guard. Once priorities are established, efforts to remove the oil from the wrecks could begin, paid through the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which is supported by the oil industry.

While NOAA's are not complete, Symons did identify five sunken ships - four within 60 miles of the coast - that could make the list as environmental threats to Maryland. They include:

-John Morgan, a Liberty ship built in 1943 at the Bethlehem-Fairfield Shipyards in Baltimore. In June 1943, on its maiden voyage, it collided with another vessel off Cape Henry and sank with a cargo of fighter planes, tanks, arms and ammunition. Sixty-seven crew members and armed guards perished.

-Marine Electric, a coal carrier out of Norfolk, Va. With 3,600 barrels of fuel oil in its bunkers, it foundered in heavy seas and sank 30 miles east of Chincoteague Inlet in February 1983. Thirty-one of the 34 crew members died in the frigid water.

-Varanger, a Norwegian tanker. It was torpedoed on Jan. 25, 1942, while carrying 12,750 tons of fuel oil. As the crew took to lifeboats, the Germans fired three more torpedoes. The ship sank 28 miles southeast of Atlantic City, N.J., but the lifeboats were spotted and fishing boats towed them to shore.

-India Arrow, an oil tanker. On Feb. 5, 1942, the tanker, carrying 88,369 barrels of diesel fuel, was torpedoed 20 miles southeast of Cape May, N.J. Nine officers and 29 crew abandoned ship, but only 12 survived.

Spills from wrecks are a global threat, with the highest concentration of ships lying in the western Pacific. But the U.S. coastline, too, is littered with vessels sunk by Japanese and German submarines, in collisions or storms.

NOAA is using a $1 million appropriation secured last year by Maryland Sen. Barbara A. Mikulski and Rep. Elijah E. Cummings, both Democrats, to inventory wrecks and identify environmental threats. Part of NOAA's task has been to comb through ship manifests, naval records, reports of sinkings, insurance documents and survivors' accounts to determine which ships burned and which probably went down with their fuel and cargo.

From that, the agency can work to identify those posing the greatest risk of leaking, and those offering opportunities for salvage operations to recover the oil or other cargo before it becomes a costly spill.

Some are already leaking. The most famous example is the 608-foot battleship USS Arizona at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Sunk Dec. 7, 1941, during the Japanese attack, it went down with 1,177 sailors on board, and 1.1 million gallons of fuel. About half of that fuel remains on board and continues to leak into the harbor.

At a Baltimore conference last month, David L. Conlin of the National Park Service said his study of the leak found that previously intact fuel compartments are still corroding, rupturing and releasing their contents.

While Conlin's study concluded there is "no pressing need" for "invasive" procedures to enter the ship - which is a war grave - to recover the fuel, it also suggests how long these 70-year-old wrecks may remain environmental concerns.

"Three hundred sixty years from now, in the core part of the USS Arizona, the oil bunkers here will still have significant structural integrity," he said.

Another example is the SS Jacob Luckenbach. A freighter carrying military supplies, it left San Francisco in July 1953, headed for Korea, when it struck another vessel in fog. It sank just 17 miles off the coast, settling in 180 feet of water with 457,000 gallons of bunker fuel on board.

In the early 1990s, Californians began to notice mysterious, intermittent oil spills on their beaches. Over the next decade, more than 51,000 shorebirds were covered with oil and died. Oil and tar balls floated onto the beaches.

Investigators sampled the goo and tried to match it to fuel in the bunkers of passing ships. "But we couldn't figure out where it was coming from," Symons said.

It wasn't until 2002 that the state's technical dive community - recreational divers who used advanced technologies to reach more challenging sites - came forward and said they knew a shipwreck in the area that had been leaking oil for years, Symons said. It was the Luckenbach.

Cleanup and wildlife rehabilitation cost $2 million. Salvage of 100,000 gallons of the ship's oil eventually cost another $20 million, said Dagmar Schmidt-Etkin of Environmental Research Consulting. The rest remains on board.

Identifying wrecks that pose a serious risk of leaks and extracting the before an incident occurs is costly, she said. But there is a cost to doing nothing, too: the economic losses to fisheries and tourism; monitoring wrecks for signs of spills; maintaining the personnel, equipment and supplies needed to respond when needed; cleaning the shoreline and oiled wildlife; and disposing of the oil.

Her study estimated the costs of dealing with an spill from a shipwreck at $1 million to $5 million for a small spill at a protected location, to $20 million to $100 million for a big, complex spill recovery in a difficult, or open-water location.

Symons said there are many more ships like the Luckenbach off North Carolina, Virginia and Maryland, "and all the way up the seaboard, with the potential for having significant pollutants on board. We can wait until one of these vessels breaks apart, or we can try to be proactive."

Scott Wahl, public information officer for the New Jersey beach town of Avalon, said at the conference that his town has just 2,000 year-round residents. But its beach economy is dependent on clean and healthy beaches.

"Every job along the beach is dependent on clean beaches," he said. "Without that sand on the beach, we don't have an economy. Without a clean environment, we don't have an economy." Preventing spills from shipwrecks, he said, "is not a cost; it's an investment."

Explore further: NOAA team discovers two vessels from WWII convoy battle off North Carolina

4.3 /5 (8 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Australia questions crew of ship that ran aground

Apr 06, 2010

(AP) -- The crew of a coal-carrying ship that ran aground on Australia's Great Barrier Reef and is leaking oil will be questioned Tuesday about why their vessel was in a restricted area, an official said.

Oil slick concern after ships collide near Mumbai

Aug 09, 2010

The Indian coastguard was trying on Monday to contain oil from a badly-listing container ship that collided with another vessel near the city of Mumbai, a defence ministry spokesman said.

Recommended for you

Stopping the leaks

2 hours ago

When a big old cast-iron water main blows, it certainly makes for a spectacular media event.

Alpine lifelines on the brink

3 hours ago

Only one in ten Alpine rivers are healthy enough to maintain water supply and to cope with climate impacts according to a report by WWF. The publication is the first-ever comprehensive study on the condition ...

User comments : 11

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Moebius
3.8 / 5 (9) Jul 17, 2011
Why worry about it, war is good. Just look at what we are doing. We are talking about cutting spending on everything but the one thing that has almost no redeeming value and is going to bankrupt us. Meanwhile the spectre of past military spending hasn't caught up with us yet.

We are repeating all the errors that brought down the Roman empire. Overreaching military dreams, unrestricted immigration and religious wacko's taking over the government. It will bring us down too.
TheGhostofOtto1923
2 / 5 (9) Jul 17, 2011
Why worry about it, war is good...cutting spending on everything but the one thing that has almost no redeeming value and is going to bankrupt us...
You are naive. And apparently blind to the existential threat that religion-mandated population overgrowth poses to the entire world.

Fighting the results of this is the most important thing the west can do. Why are al quieda and the taliban so hard to beat? They are provided with an inexhaustible supply of cannon fodder. Without coalition forces to oppose this steady stream, pakistan and the entire would fall to extremists and the world would descend quickly into the kind of war that you would like even less.
We are repeating all the errors that brought down the Roman empire.
The EMPIRE never fell. It relocated to a more strategically advantageous position, as usual.
religious wacko's taking over the government.
You should try to imagine what truly authentic religious wackos are capable of.
cont
TheGhostofOtto1923
2.6 / 5 (5) Jul 17, 2011
For instance
http://www.youtub...3vhTO248
and
http://www.youtub...=related

All religionists are dangerous in many ways. But some present a more immediate danger than others.
kochevnik
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 17, 2011
Fighting the results of this is the most important thing the west can do. Why are al quieda and the taliban so hard to beat?

Hello christopath: Al Quieda is simply a kludge of CIA assets, unfortunates picked up by their opponents, and Israeli SOF Arab impersonators. They are an Anglo effort to keep components of the military industrial complex funded, long after their relevance and the cold war that spawned them evaporated.
Grizzled
not rated yet Jul 18, 2011
I presume that out of all those torpedoed ships - tankers and others - quite a few must have had their fuel storage tanks burst right then and there. Where are the ecological disasters that ensued? If massive simultaneous leaks didn't cause them, hard to imagine how random, staged and slow leaks will.
Isaacsname
not rated yet Jul 18, 2011
There's far more than what's mentioned in the article, all sent to the bottom on purpose.

For example, the Gulf of Mexico

http://www.charts...11.shtml

Makes you want some red snapper right now, no ?

This one's global

http://cns.miis.e...ping.htm

Why don't they address the real issues at hand and stop side-stepping things with bullsh*t studies ?
Cave_Man
not rated yet Jul 18, 2011
I presume that out of all those torpedoed ships - tankers and others - quite a few must have had their fuel storage tanks burst right then and there. Where are the ecological disasters that ensued? If massive simultaneous leaks didn't cause them, hard to imagine how random, staged and slow leaks will.

Hmm yes, in the early 20th century, lets send out expensive technology that by today's standards would be lightyears inferior either: during the depression/dust bowl era, during WWII or while recovering from WWII...

At least someone remembered, I bet there is all kinds of yet to be discovered "superfund" sites.

Too bad this one happens to be another gun pointed at the head of most complex multi-cellular life. Once the ocean goes there will be little if any hope left for complex life, bacteria sure, but anything bigger than a slug......no chance.

Well, maybe in 100 million years.

Now think how the govt spends trillion$ on frivolous things like war.
antialias_physorg
not rated yet Jul 18, 2011
Why are al quieda and the taliban so hard to beat?

Because they were well trained by the CIA when they were fighting the Russians as the US' proxy?

But even before that they were hard to beat. The Russians couldn't do it with 10 times the manpower the coalition force has in there right now. What makes you think the coalition will be able to?
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (2) Jul 18, 2011
Why are al quieda and the taliban so hard to beat?
Hello christopath: Al Quieda is simply a kludge of CIA assets, unfortunates picked up by their opponents, and Israeli SOF Arab impersonators. They are an Anglo effort to keep components of the military industrial complex funded, long after their relevance and the cold war that spawned them evaporated.
Perhaps.

AND YET - all those idle, hungry, angry young people, the masses created by forced population growth, would STILL EXIST. And the cultures which created them would STILL endeavor to use them to conquer their neighbors and export their extremism around the world, as they have stated they would time and time again.

And the west would STILL be faced with the Decision whether to fight them now, or later. Which do you think is the more prudent choice?

This is an old and recurring dilemma. All of history is built around this. Nothing new under the sun.

Signed,
A Concerned Antireligionist
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (2) Jul 18, 2011
What makes you think the coalition will be able to?
Russia did what we are now doing, and what we did in vietnam and korea et al... We are engaged in a Process of attritive Social Engineering. The slow Process of destroying those ancient, obsolete cultures which, if left Unattended, would overrun the west.

Victory can be measured in many ways. The concerted Efforts by the french, the allies, and the USSR in vietnam finally resulted in a country which is now a strong, productive, and stable member of the world community.

This is due in no small part to the destruction of indigene cultures, which enabled family planning efforts to drastically reduce population growth.

This was also the most substantial result of the world wars for the pops of eurasia. ONE BILLION abortions worldwide since the beginning of the 20th century, and their descendents to two gens. THIS is what it takes.
http://www.johnst...310.html

-These sorts of things take time.

nayTall
1 / 5 (1) Jul 18, 2011
i can't believe al qaeda has time traveling capabilities and managed to sink a ship on Feb. 2, 1942.. we need more TSA at the LHC!!