Web abuzz with claims that Hubble sought to censor Lemaitre's paper
July 13, 2011 by Bob Yirka 
Edwin Hubble
(PhysOrg.com) -- In one of those odd scientific debates where people who ought to know better, speak up, and in this case, print articles on arXiv, making claims about personal issues rather than science, buzz has been created that might lead to little more than rhetoric. In this case, it’s first Sidney van den Bergh, a Canadian astronomer, who has published a paper on arXiv citing evidence that Belgian astronomer Georges Lemaitre's paper on cosmological observations appeared to have been intentionally censored when translated into English, and then David Block, a South African mathematician and amateur historian adding fuel to the fire by publishing to the same site an article where he asserts he has proof that American, Edwin Hubble (of whom the Hubble telescope is named) was involved in a conspiracy of sorts, to censor the paper previously mentioned by van den Bergh.
The entire argument centers on a paper first published by Lemaitre in 1927 in Belgium; written in French it wasn’t read much outside of his home country. In the paper, Lemaitre outlined his theory that the universe appeared to be expanding, and also offered a constant that could be used to determine the rate.
In 1929, Hubble published a paper that offered the same theory and constant (which came to be known as the Hubble constant) and was at the time given full credit for the discovery. Later however (1931), Lemaitre’s paper was translated into English and published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (MNRAS), which of course gave some credence to Lemaitre’s work, but not entirely, because it was subsequently discovered that certain sections of the original paper had been omitted, the most important of which, was the part where Lemaitre derived the constant for which Hubble was ultimately credited.
Georges Lemaitre
Block offers as proof, a letter written by Scottish astronomer William Marshall Smart (editor for MNRAS), that he says, shows that it was Lemaitre himself who performed the translation, but because Smart only asked for certain sections to be translated, the end result wound up an abbreviated version of the original. Block then goes on to say he believes it was pressure on Smart, from Hubble, that caused him to do what he did, though he offers little evidence to support such a claim.At this point, professional historians are not convinced, and so, this argument, as with many others of its kind in the science field, will likely rage on, with little gained, but perhaps something lost, as energy that could be spent on science, is wasted on meaningless squabble.
More information: A Hubble Eclipse: Lemaitre and Censorship, David L. Block, arXiv:1106.3928v2 [physics.hist-ph] http://arxiv.org/a … /1106.3928v2
Abstract
One of the greatest discoveries of modern times is that of the expanding Universe, almost invariably attributed to Hubble (1929). What is not widely known is that the original treatise by Lemaitre (1927) contained a rich fusion of both theory and of observation. The French paper was meticulously censored when printed in English - all discussions of radial velocities and distances (and the very first empirical determination of "H") were omitted. Fascinating insights are gleaned from a letter recently found in the Lema^itre archives. An appeal is made for a Lemaitre Telescope, to honour the discoverer of the expanding universe.
via Nature
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
32 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
2
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
33 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
39
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases – and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if – it will be an expensive undertaking.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus
An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Jul 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
http://arxiv.org/abs/1107.0442
Jul 13, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Now many are starting to see the connection between:
a.) Hiding and manipulating data on the Sun - Earth's heat source,
b.) The world-wide fable of CO2-induced global warming,
c.) Disintegration of the USA space program,
d.) Disintegrating of the world's economy,
e.) Loss of national sovereignty, and
f.) Budget negotiations!
They are not mere coincidence!
They follow from a 1972 decision to use "Global Climate Change" as the common enemy to unite nations, end nationalism, and avoid the threat of nuclear annihilation.
Many skeptics endorse those noble goals, but not the use of scientific information as a propaganda tool that might lead to a tyrannical world government, as in George Orwell's book, "1984".
http://www.online...ll/1984/
Many are now seeing the connection [1].
1. Dark Fireworks on the Sun, by Dr. Tony Phiilips
www.physorg.com/n...sun.html
Oliver K. Manuel
Jul 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sep 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
www.irishweathero...26.html/
Let's let observations determine the validity of models rather than models determining the validity of observations!
Many fields of science astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, nuclear, particle, planetary and solar sciences have been seriously compromised [1] since it was decided on 1971 [2] that Earths heat source is a steady H-fusion reactor that cannot cause climate change.
1. Neutron Repulsion, The APEIRON Journal, in press (2011)
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
2. Deep Roots of Climategate (2011)
http://dl.dropbox...oots.pdf
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Sep 06, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The basic mechanics of climate change are very simple, the earths atmosphere was at one point unable to sustain complex life. The atmosphere (both methane and carbon) were sequestrated in plant, marine and fungal species. Those species became coal and oil. We extract the coal/oil and return it to the atmosphere, thus returning the atmosphere gradually to a point where it no longer can support life. No body debates this. This is not a conspiracy. The debate is in regards to projections over the climactic inputs of elevated greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, and earths ability to resink them. You would need to be a fool, if for a second you dont see our impact upon the planet and allocate all weather phenomena to solar output. The figures just dont balance.