Report calls for urgent reform of kangaroo industry

Jul 14, 2011
Beheaded wild-caught kangaroos

The University of Technology, Sydney think tank on kangaroos – THINKK, has called for a number of policy changes to improve welfare standards in the industry in its latest report, Welfare implications of commercial kangaroo killing: Do the ends justify the means?

The THINKK researchers, based within the UTS Institute for Sustainable Futures, say that every year over a million dependent young die as collateral damage to the commercial kill (about three million adults) – something that would be unacceptable in the livestock industry. The dependent young may be killed through a blow to the skull, for example with a steel water pipe or the tow bar of a vehicle. Others are left alive to later die from exposure, starvation or predation.

A lead author of the report Dr. Dror Ben-Ami said the legitimacy of the ends of the kangaroo industry is questionable, particularly the much inflated perceptions of as pests and as a panacea for Australia's land degradation and greenhouse gas emissions.

"Current research does not indicate kangaroos are overabundant in the landscape, in fact there is long-term research showing that there is minimal loss in pastoral property productivity due to competition between livestock and kangaroos for resources.

"On the question of kangaroos replacing livestock as an environmentally-friendly meat source, there is no convincing evidence that such replacement is likely to occur in the future.

"The 'means' by which kangaroos are killed carry a high welfare cost to both adult kangaroos and dependent young that is below the mandated welfare standards in the National Code of Practice for the Humane Shooting of Kangaroos and Wallabies. Many are aware of these welfare concerns, yet nothing has been done to resolve them.

"At the very least we recommend two urgent policy changes that are that are most feasible to implement and would achieve a substantial improvement in welfare outcomes:
•         mandating a male only kill would ensure young are not killed;
•         requiring that meat processors only accept carcasses with the heads retained and showing that the kangaroos were brain-shot.”

Dr. Ben-Ami said the need for the commercial harvest on the landscape level should be re-evaluated on the grounds of both necessity and ethical considerations.

At the same time kangaroo management at the property level should be reassessed, given a downgrading of the estimated annual costs incurred by farmers due to kangaroos from more than $200 million to $44 million.

"Without a resolution of the outstanding issues of the kangaroo industry, an Australian moratorium and/or international trade ban on commercial kangaroo killing may eventuate," he said.

The report can be viewed here .

Explore further: Study shows sharks have personalities

Provided by University of Technology, Sydney

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Australian kangaroo cull prompts outrage

Oct 02, 2009

The culling of some 140 kangaroos on one of Australia's most famous race car tracks prompted outrage Friday from environmentalists and animal rights activists.

Global warming threatens Australia's iconic kangaroos

Oct 15, 2008

As concerns about the effects of global warming continue to mount, a new study published in the December issue of Physiological and Biochemical Zoology finds that an increase in average temperature of only two degrees Celsiu ...

Recommended for you

Study shows sharks have personalities

12 hours ago

Some sharks are 'gregarious' and have strong social connections, whilst others are more solitary and prefer to remain inconspicuous, according to a new study which is the first to show that the notorious ...

Genetic secrets of the monarch butterfly revealed

18 hours ago

The monarch butterfly is one of the most iconic insects in the world, best known for its distinct orange and black wings and a spectacular annual mass migration across North America. However, little has been ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

askantik
not rated yet Jul 14, 2011
How can doing something that causes pain and suffering, yet is totally unnecessary, be done in an ethical way?
Jonseer
1 / 5 (1) Jul 14, 2011
I guess the Australian focus on Japanese Whaling is an effort to detract from their criminal record in regards to their own wildlife.