Texas Ed Board compromises on evolution materials

July 22, 2011 By JIM VERTUNO , Associated Press
Joe Zamecki protests out side a building where theTexas Board of Education was holding a meeting, Thursday, July 21, 2011, in Austin, Texas. The debate over teaching evolution in public schools is resurfacing at the Texas State Board of Education. (AP Photo/Eric Gay)

(AP) -- The Texas State Board of Education gave final approval to supplemental high school science materials on Friday, delivering a blow to the board's social conservatives after a brief flare-up over some lessons teaching the principles of evolution.

The lessons in question included a lab comparison on chimpanzee and , the and cell complexity.

A board-appointed reviewer had called the lessons errors and recommended changes, but a group of scientists objected on Friday, threatening to re-ignite a fierce debate over teaching in Texas public schools.

The board's social conservatives compromised when it appeared they would lose a vote to reject the reviewer's changes in favor of the original lessons.

Instead of a showdown vote on evolution, the panel agreed to approve the material and have Education Commissioner Robert Scott continue working on the lessons in question with publisher Holt McDougal.

"Today we saw Texas kids and sound science finally win a vote on the State Board of Education," said Kathy Miller, president of the Texas Freedom Network, a group that supports mainstream scientists in the and has repeatedly sparred with board conservatives over education standards.

"We saw the far right's stranglehold over the is finally loosening," Miller said.

The conservative wing in 2009 had pushed through controversial standards that called for schools to scrutinize "all sides" of scientific theory.

Several of the conservative board members disputed the notion of defeat on Friday.

Chairwoman Barbara Cargill, R-The Woodlands, said she was pleased with the compromise because Scott will continue working with Holt McDougal to find language that is factually correct and fits the standards adopted in 2009.

"I feel very comfortable turning it over to him," Cargill said.

The 15-member board is dominated by Republicans but the ultra-conservative wing lost a key vote in 2010 when former chairman Don McLeroy was defeated by Thomas Ratliff, R-Mount Pleasant.

Ratliff said he would have voted to support the findings of the scientists and throw out the changes recommended by the board reviewer.

"There's no question had some seats not changed, it would have been different," Ratliff said.

David Bradley, R-Beaumont, one of the board's most conservative members, said that without the compromise, he would have sought to kill the entire submission.

This week's meeting had been expected to re-ignite the fiery debate over evolution that put the board in the national spotlight two years ago.

One conservative group had put a call out to pack Thursday's public hearing with witnesses urging the board to adopt that question evolution. But they were outnumbered by witnesses supporting evolution.

The board avoided a contentious debate on the theory of intelligent design when an electronic textbook supporting the theory did not make Scott's list of recommended materials and was not eligible for consideration.

The new online teaching materials are necessary because the state could not afford to buy new textbooks this year, leaving students to use some that are several years old.

Supplemental materials that are approved have the advantage of being on the state's recommended list, but school districts can still buy other materials they chose.

Explore further: Science materials in Texas get prelim. approval


Related Stories

Science materials in Texas get prelim. approval

July 22, 2011

(AP) -- An expected fight over teaching evolution in Texas classrooms fizzled Thursday when the state's Board of Education gave preliminary approval to supplemental science materials for the coming school year and beyond ...

Texas board hears testimony on science standards

March 26, 2009

(AP) -- Tensions over the teaching of evolution are simmering as the State Board of Education begins the final stretch in the process of adopting new classroom science curriculum standards.

Evolution still being debated in Kansas

August 9, 2005

The Kansas Board of Education is expected to soon adopt revised science standards encouraging students to challenge aspects of the theory of evolution.

Science setback for Texas schools

March 31, 2009

After three all-day meetings and a blizzard of amendments and counter-amendments, the Texas Board of Education cast its final vote Friday on state science standards. The results weren't pretty.

Recommended for you

Evaluation of scientific rigor in animal research

December 2, 2016

The "reproducibility crisis" in biomedical research has led to questions about the scientific rigor in animal research, and thus the ethical justification of animal experiments. In research publishing in the Open Access journals ...

Researchers find evidence of original 1620 Plymouth settlement

November 30, 2016

Three hundred and ninety-five years after Pilgrims celebrated the first Thanksgiving in Plymouth, Massachusetts, researchers from UMass Boston's Andrew Fiske Memorial Center for Archaeological Research can say they have definitively ...


Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

4.7 / 5 (3) Jul 22, 2011
Anyone who studies the human eye (a key talking point for ID) would realize it is about the worst possible design that still works. Squids, cats, dogs, many insects, and raptors all have better optical systems than primates. "God's image" is poorly focused.
not rated yet Jul 23, 2011
This whole thing is as absurd as a bunch of politicians voting whether 1 plus 1 equals 2 or not. Shouldnt it be up to actual biologists to decide about evolution?
4.9 / 5 (44) Jul 24, 2011
Evolution is a hypothesis not a scientific fact. Intelligent design is a hypothesis not a scientific fact. Only one of the two can in principal become scientific facts. The latter can not because science does not deal with metaphysics.

THIS is what should be taught,.. how science works.
not rated yet Jul 25, 2011
Evolution is a hypothesis not a scientific fact. Intelligent design is a hypothesis not a scientific fact. Only one of the two can in principal become scientific facts. The latter can not because science does not deal with metaphysics.

THIS is what should be taught,.. how science works.

Actually, it's the Darwinian Model(and it's modern updates)vs. Intelligent Design that are theories, not the physical evolution of life-forms itself.
The Darwinian (and it's modern updates) model is a well grounded and relativelly efective theory (mainly because it allows cross-checking with other areas of science), and based on the Scientific Method, but, yes, while a good one, it's still a theory.
That's what I was taught, and I attended a Church controlled school for a couple of years.

not rated yet Jul 25, 2011
while a good one, it's still a theory.

The word theory does not mean it is any less valid. Theories do not become facts when proven. Theory of relativity, germ theory of disease and such are theories, too. Hypothesis is the right word for proposed scientific explanation, an "educated guess".

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.