Stellar eclipse gives glimpse of exoplanet

Jul 19, 2011 Jennifer Chu
A rendering of the silhouette of 55 Cancri e transiting its parent star, compared to the Earth and Jupiter transiting our sun. Image: Jason Rowe, NASA/Ames; Jaymie Matthews, UBC

A group of astronomers led by an MIT professor has spotted an exoplanetary eclipse of a star only 40 light years away — right around the corner, astronomically speaking — revealing a "super-Earth."

The far-out planet, named 55 Cancri e, is twice as big as Earth and nearly nine times more massive. It is most likely composed of rocky material, similar to Earth, supplemented with light elements such as water and hydrogen gas. Scientists estimate the planet’s surface is much hotter than ours: close to 2,700 degrees Celsius.

Exoplanets — planets outside our own solar system — have captivated astronomers in recent years as interest in finding life on other Earth-like planets has intensified.

But Josh Winn, the Class of 1942 Career Development Assistant Professor of Physics at MIT, says exobiologists should probably not flock to 55 Cancri e looking for signs of life: The temperatures are just too high to sustain living organisms. But he suspects the exoplanet will attract the telescopes of many astronomers, mainly for reasons of visibility: 55 Cancri e is relatively close to Earth compared to other known exoplanets, and, as a result, the star around which the planet orbits appears roughly 100 times brighter than any other star with an eclipsing planet.

“Everything we do in astronomy is starving for more light,” Winn says. “The more light a star gives you, the more chances you have of learning something interesting … and everyone’s been waiting for a system like this that you can study in great detail.”

An 18-hour year

Winn and his colleagues collected starlight data continuously for two weeks from Canada’s Microvariability and Oscillations of space telescope, called “MOST” for short. They directed the satellite scope toward 55 Cancri e based on a tip from doctoral student Rebekah Dawson of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Last year, Dawson published a mathematical analysis of existing data on 55 Cancri e, and found it took the planet 18 hours to orbit its star.

Her results suggested 55 Cancri e was much closer to its star than previously thought, and Winn immediately saw an opportunity to catch sight of an eclipse.

“If [a planet] is just hugging the star, there’s a greater chance of an eclipse, versus if the planet is really far out, in which case you have to be luckier to see it right in front of the star,” he says.

An eclipse has the potential to unlock many mysteries about an exoplanet. For example, astronomers can identify a planet’s diameter, mass, composition and atmospheric conditions by measuring the differences in light as a planet passes in front of, or “transits,” its star. However, only a handful of rocky exoplanets have been known to transit, and every one of them eclipses a faint star.

‘A firefly across a searchlight’

For two weeks, Winn and his colleagues tracked the brightness of 55 Cancri e’s super-bright star, discovering tiny dips in the data that occurred every 18 hours, a finding that confirmed Dawson’s original theory by suggesting the occurrence of an exoplanetary eclipse.

Andrew Howard, a research astronomer at the University of California at Berkeley who was not involved in this study, said spotting such a miniature in deep space is no small feat.

“This is like looking for a firefly crawling across a searchlight [by] looking for the decreasing brightness of that searchlight from 1,000 kilometers away,” Howard says, adding that planet hunters now have plenty of high-quality data to play with in learning more about 55 Cancri e’s atmosphere and composition. “This is just a new world,” Howard says.

The results of the study have been accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Letters. Winn hopes the study will prompt to explore 55 Cancri e with their own tools and telescopes.

Dawson’s findings prompted another group at MIT to investigate the rocky . Sara Seager, the Ellen Swallow Richards Professor of Extrasolar at MIT, and Brice-Olivier Demory, a postdoc in the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, detected a transit of 55 Cancri e using NASA’s Warm Spitzer, a powerful infrared space telescope. From the spectral data they collected, the group calculated the planet’s dimensions, confirming Winn’s calculations.

Demory and Seager plan to commandeer the telescope again next year to catch the planet, this time behind its star. By measuring the difference between the light given off from the planet in front of and behind its star, the group could determine exactly how much light the planet itself gives off, which could in turn give researchers clues about the planet’s atmospheric composition.

“It’s still going to be hard to learn everything about this planet,” Winn says. “But at least we have what might be the best system in the sky to study it.”

Explore further: Mysterious molecules in space

Related Stories

Explained: Transiting exoplanets

Jan 27, 2011

In the quest to find life elsewhere in the universe, planetary scientists have detected more than 500 planets outside the solar system, or exoplanets, over the past 15 years. About one-fifth of those were ...

Learning from hot Jupiters

Dec 15, 2010

The possibility of discovering a planet that is small, cool, rocky, orbiting a sunlike star and able to host life -- an Earth twin, in other words -- has made the search for planets outside of our solar ...

Transiting super-Earth detected around naked eye star

May 02, 2011

One of the first known stars to host an extrasolar planet, was that of 55 Cancri. The first planet in this system was reported in 1997 and today the system is known to host at least five planets, the inner ...

Setting sight on a single star

May 16, 2011

NASA recently selected 20 small satellites to fly as auxiliary cargo aboard rockets that are planned to launch in 2011 and 2012.

Recommended for you

Mysterious molecules in space

9 hours ago

Over the vast, empty reaches of interstellar space, countless small molecules tumble quietly though the cold vacuum. Forged in the fusion furnaces of ancient stars and ejected into space when those stars ...

Comet Jacques makes a 'questionable' appearance

Jul 28, 2014

What an awesome photo! Italian amateur astronomer Rolando Ligustri nailed it earlier today using a remote telescope in New Mexico and wide-field 4-inch (106 mm) refractor. Currently the brightest comet in ...

Image: Our flocculent neighbour, the spiral galaxy M33

Jul 28, 2014

The spiral galaxy M33, also known as the Triangulum Galaxy, is one of our closest cosmic neighbours, just three million light-years away. Home to some forty billion stars, it is the third largest in the ...

Image: Chandra's view of the Tycho Supernova remnant

Jul 25, 2014

More than four centuries after Danish astronomer Tycho Brahe first observed the supernova that bears his name, the supernova remnant it created is now a bright source of X-rays. The supersonic expansion of ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Vendicar_Decarian
4 / 5 (4) Jul 19, 2011
What a shame that Republicans will be defunding this scientific research on Aug 2, 2011
Skepticus_Rex
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 19, 2011
I'm guessing that you have forgotten who defunded future moon missions. Defunding of worthwhile science is a democrat thing. Continued funding of unethically-inclined, dead-end science also tends to be a democrat thing. Just saying...

(Don't kill the messenger). :)
yep
1 / 5 (1) Jul 20, 2011
It is a shame people are pitted against each other with push button labels.
jsa09
not rated yet Jul 20, 2011
What a lack of imagination calling this planet a super-earth. Better to call it a super Mercury if you just simply have to go with super anything.
Skepticus_Rex
1 / 5 (1) Jul 21, 2011
Calling something a "super-earth" may indeed seem unimaginative. But, when you think about it, it is a fitting term for lack of a definitive term. Earth is the largest terrestrial planet known in our solar system.

So, anything bigger than earth that is a rocky, terrestrial planet can receive the name of "super-earth" until a better, generally-agreed-upon term is made available to astronomers.

It is akin to the term "super-jupiter." Let the race to decide terminology begin. :)