Space station faces steady threat from orbiting space junk
July 25, 2011 By Scott Powers
Now that the space shuttle is retired, NASA and space agencies around the world will focus on the International Space Station for the rest of this decade - and cross their fingers that it lasts that long.
The station, with its crew of six international astronauts, orbits Earth at an altitude of about 220 miles, a neighborhood that is increasingly cluttered by space junk, mainly parts of old rockets and satellites that were either abandoned or destroyed in orbit.
Thousands of pieces are big enough - and shooting through space fast enough - to seriously damage or destroy the $100 billion laboratory.
"The orbit they are flying in is the worst possible. . . . The Russians blew up all kinds of things in that damned orbit. So there are thousands of pieces in that particular orbit," said Christopher Kraft, a retired director of NASA's Manned Space Flight Center.
The odds are against the station getting hit by debris big enough to destroy it before its planned abandonment in late 2020. But the threat is no long shot. NASA's projections indicate the chance of a disastrous collision with space junk are about 1 in 13.
Most space debris - and the station itself - flies at or near orbital velocity of 17,500 mph. At that speed, collision with debris the size of a large bullet could blow open a hole in a station module, releasing the air inside. Larger pieces could destroy one or more of the modules.
In recent weeks, Kraft organized a belated campaign urging NASA to reconsider retiring all the shuttles, contending they are needed as emergency repair and rescue trucks. A June 30 letter he and Washington consultant Scott Spencer sent to NASA Administrator Charles Bolden and others was endorsed by other high-profile NASA retirees, including astronauts Bob Crippen, Neil Armstrong and James Lovell; flight director Gene Kranz; and space-station program director Tom Moser.
But a response by Bill Gerstenmaier, NASA associate administrator for space operations, said the station is "fully stocked" with spare components. "The space station has a spacewalk capability, with redundant suits and systems, which will allow crews to perform repairs on orbit without the need of the space shuttle," he said.
In addition, debris shields have been put in place around the station's modules, and around critical life-support units. Air-pressure sensors in each module can trigger airlock closings. And two Russian Soyuz spacecraft wait as lifeboats.
"We've done our best to put ourselves in a good position, now that the shuttle is being retired," said NASA spokesman Kelly Humphries.
Still, the shields - made of layers of aluminum, ceramic and the Kevlar fabric used in bulletproof vests - can withstand only hits by tiny debris and micro-meteors; bigger things could blow through them.
And the threat posed by space junk is getting worse. In 2007 China blew up one of its satellites, dropping thousands of pieces into range of the station's orbit. In 2009, an American and a Russian satellite collided, spreading more debris.
NASA, which evaluates risk in six-month increments, says there is a 1-in-114 chance a serious debris strike will partially disable the space station during the next six months, and 1 chance in 241 of a collision that kills astronauts or totally disables or destroys the station.
During the station's lifetime, that works out to a 1-in-6 chance of a disabling strike - and a 1-in-13 chance of a fatal collision.
A 2007 task force reporting to NASA found slightly worse odds - estimating a 1-in-8 chance that an astronaut would die or the station would have to be abandoned.
The task-force chairman, retired NASA space-station program manager Tommy Holloway, praised Gerstenmaier for overseeing improvements the report recommended, principally retrofitting old modules with shields, and building a stock of repair supplies and tools. "But that only reduced it somewhat," Holloway said, adding that such collisions remain a "substantial risk over the lifetime of the program."
NASA and the U.S. military debris surveillance systems can track junk no smaller than about 4 inches, and have identified about 20,000 pieces that size or larger. But the agency estimates there might be 500,000 smaller pieces that are big enough to do damage.
Alarms caused by detectable chunks are increasing. To avoid collisions with tracked debris, the station has had to change its orbital altitude five times in the past three years. In its first eight years, such maneuvers were required only six times.
On June 28, a piece of debris of unknown size and origin was detected 14 hours before it would cross the station's path. There was no time for an avoidance maneuver, so the astronauts took safe harbor aboard the station's two docked Soyuz spacecraft waited. The debris passed about 1,100 feet from the station.
(c) 2011, The Orlando Sentinel (Fla.).
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Yale study concludes public apathy over climate change unrelated to science literacy
Are members of the public divided about climate change because they don't understand the science behind it? If Americans knew more basic science and were more proficient in technical reasoning, would public consensus match ...
32 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
2
|
10 million years needed to recover from mass extinction
It took some 10 million years for Earth to recover from the greatest mass extinction of all time, latest research has revealed.
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
33 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
|
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
39
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Change in developmental timing was crucial in the evolutionary shift from dinosaurs to birds: study
At first glance, it's hard to see how a common house sparrow and a Tyrannosaurus Rex might have anything in common. After all, one is a bird that weighs less than an ounce, and the other is a dinosaur that ...
Computer model used to pinpoint prime materials for efficient carbon capture
When power plants begin capturing their carbon emissions to reduce greenhouse gases and to most in the electric power industry, it's a question of when, not if it will be an expensive undertaking.
'Unzipped' carbon nanotubes could help energize fuel cells, batteries
Multi-walled carbon nanotubes riddled with defects and impurities on the outside could replace some of the expensive platinum catalysts used in fuel cells and metal-air batteries, according to scientists at ...
T cells 'hunt' parasites like animal predators seek prey, study shows
By pairing an intimate knowledge of immune-system function with a deep understanding of statistical physics, a cross-disciplinary team at the University of Pennsylvania has arrived at a surprising finding: T cells use a movement ...
Manufacturing genes to attack flu virus
An international research team has manufactured a new protein that can combat deadly flu epidemics.
Same gene that stunts infants' growth also makes them grow too big: research
UCLA geneticists have identified the mutation responsible for IMAGe* syndrome, a rare disorder that stunts infants' growth. The twist? The mutation occurs on the same gene that causes Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome, which makes ...
Jul 25, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
http://www.star-t...121.html
There is also a database of objects that can be added to Google Earth that displays all tracked objects. Pretty scary, even though space is a big place...
Jul 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Well, the stuff that would HIT the station would be in orbit as well, ALSO going about 17,500 mph in probably roughly the same direction. So how about a more realistic idea of what the actual projected impact velocities could really be?
Jul 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I'm drivin' down the highway at 85 miles an hour, my normal speed, and some peabrain, also goin' as fast, decides to switch lanes while I'm in the same spot he's eyeballin'. Now, I don't know about you, but I can guess what the outcome's gonna be, even if we're neck and neck. Sorry 'bout the Dukes of Hazzard syntax, sometimes I get a lil' carried away for a spell.
Jul 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Well on earth I'm pretty sure friction with the road, which isn't present in space makes that a messy crash but in orbit relative velocity of the two would determine the damage as there is no matter to interact
Jul 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 26, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Same orbital height does NOT mean same direction. Especially if we are talking about stuff that is the result of explosions, crashes or simply leftovers from some other orbit which has drifted down because of gradual fiction with the remnants of the atmosphere.
Even if the orbital alignments are only slightly off then the resultant differential speed goes into the hundreds of mph very quickly.
And you're going to transport megatons of glue into orbit (and then catch all the debris) before compacting that stuf exactly...how?
Jul 26, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Well, let's hope the station isn't hit by an object of equal size as in your car analogy. What happens when a sparrow merges into you?
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Just look at what happens when a sparow merges into the windshield of a fighter plane. And a bird (while relatively big compared to most space debris) is a relatively 'soft' object moving at a few hundred mph relative to the jet.
Now think about what a screw or a larger piece of metal will do to a relatively flimsy space station at a few thousand mph difference.