Sexless for a million years, stick bugs elude extinction
The genus Timema, a species of walking stick insect, has been asexual for over a million years and has escaped extinction. (Photos by Bart Ziglstra)
(PhysOrg.com) -- Simon Fraser University biologists say a species of stick insect found to be celibate for 1.5 million years raises questions about why these particular lineages have escaped extinction thus far.
In a paper published in the journal Current Biology, SFU biology professor Bernie Crespi and Tanja Schwander, a former post-doctoral researcher in Crespis lab, say the persistence of the insect, known as the genus Timema, is most likely because of a combination of genetic and ecological processes.
The researchers used a series of genetic analyses to show that several clonal or cloned lineages in the stick insect, mainly found in the western U.S., have persisted for more than one million generations. The finding raises questions around why theyve eluded extinction to date and has allowed researchers to address the consequences of long-term clonality.
Why most species reproduce sexually is a big question in evolutionary biology, because at least theoretically, it appears that clonal reproduction would be more efficient, says Schwander, currently a fellow in evolutionary genetics at the University of Groningen, in the Netherlands.
The genus Timema, a species of walking stick insect, has been asexual for over a million years and has escaped extinction. (Photos by Bart Ziglstra)
Many genetic and ecological mechanisms have been suggested that could result in disadvantages of clonal reproduction. One common expectation of these mechanisms is that reproductive advantages gained by new clonal lineages will be quickly eroded over time.Their genetic studies led the researchers to determine the last point in time the insect line engaged in sex. Their findings add to the growing evidence that asexuality does not always result in the rapid extinction of a lineage and are the basis of their ongoing research.
More information: Molecular Evidence for Ancient Asexuality in Timema Stick Insects, Current Biology, Volume 21, Issue 13, 1129-1134, 16 June 2011
Summary
Asexuality is rare in animals in spite of its apparent advantage relative to sexual reproduction, indicating that it must be associated with profound costs. One expectation is that reproductive advantages gained by new asexual lineages will be quickly eroded over time. Ancient asexual taxa that have evolved and adapted without sex would be scandalous exceptions to this rule, but it is often difficult to exclude the possibility that putative asexuals deploy some form of cryptic sex, or have abandoned sex more recently than estimated from divergence times to sexual relatives. Here we provide evidence, from high intraspecific divergence of mitochondrial sequence and nuclear allele divergence patterns, that several independently derived Timema stick-insect lineages have persisted without recombination for more than a million generations. Nuclear alleles in the asexual lineages displayed significantly higher intraindividual divergences than in related sexual species. In addition, within two asexuals, nuclear allele phylogenies suggested the presence of two clades, with sequences from the same individual appearing in both clades. These data strongly support ancient asexuality in Timema and validate the genus as an exceptional opportunity to attack the question of how asexual reproduction can be maintained over long periods of evolutionary time.
Provided by Simon Fraser University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
17 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
17 hours ago |
3.3 / 5 (17) |
51
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
And it will remain an unsolvable enigma for a long, long time because there is a meaning enshrouded within sex that cannot be attained by purely evolutionary reasoning.
Evolutionary thinking cannot answer the question of "WHY is there sex?" Never mind even getting to explain as to HOW is it that there is sex because it's an impossibility of the first kind, an either all or nothing proposition. Or to put it more obscurely, it's irreducibly complex.
The "two shall become one" is a mystery to those who will not believe in Special creation.
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
This is the problem with evolution - highly rapid mutation rates are required to produce the impossibly big diversity we find around us and yet we find this conundrum of creatures having survived for millions of years without ANY change. Begs the question of what is evolution? All things to all people, and then some. Whenever an exception is found that clearly discredits the mythical evolution, another adhoc assumption is brought up to explain it. No matter that that assumption then contradicts some basic tenets. The all-shape all-forms chameleon that is evolution lives on...
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Schwander you go ahead and clone yourself ; let's see if you can do this. No help from nobody just yourself. And why to clone or reproduce???
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
It's very funny at times, starts out a little slow, but definitely worth an hour, enjoy:
http://www.youtub...1d-tPr6M
This article kind of reminds me of a part from the movie called "Master and Commander" when Russel Crow says "let me guess: it's a stick"! hahaha!
You are right about the issue of how sex is irreducible complexity: it's no less than a chicken or egg first problem, except for in this case they both have to come about at the same time! Tuff one to explain away!
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Have you any info about wether or not the atmosphere used to have a far greater oxygen content, allowing insects to grow unusually large?
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Hey kev, come up with any evidence for the existance of your magic sky fairy yet? Didn't think so. How about some evidence that your collected fairy tales were dictated by said fairy? Didn't think so. How about some evidence (or even a logical argument) showing how any shortcomings in Evolutionary theory would automatically prove your particular delusion by default? Didnt't think so. Still waiting...
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Your first comment is on point it states a problem and it is a question that evolution as a paradigm cannot answer. It is these types of questions that eventually change a paradigm.
Your second comment is baseless. It is a given fact to some of us that there have been a few (5) massive extinctions on this planet. From those there has always been a rebound. I offer no explanation as to why they happened. But that speciation and specialization took place is hard to argue, for me at least, and I think the fossil record while incomplete is probably close to accurate portrayal of the periods.
Having very few species that deviate from the norm is not a detriment to evolution but rather proves the rule, that cloning is in fact very very rare. But to your point evolution has no way of answering why or how sex developed - but it can answer why sex has been successful.
@ everyone else
Kevin is Christian and so am I - some questions are about flaws in logic - nothing else
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
The evolution of sex is a gap that may never be filled, but is it necessary to invoke a god just because we don't know how something came about?
We don't know exactly how the pyramids were built. Does that mean aliens did it?
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Ditto the explanation for sex. Really? How many articles have been written ON THIS WEBSITE about the arms race between host and parasite. Christ, that idea is probably almost 50 years old. This is as bad as the creotards continuing to chant "there are no fossils!".
Kev and others, I'm sure it makes you feel really really good about yourselves to go out and show them pagans what's what, but in the real world (where most of us exist), you just come across as uninformed (at best) idiots (at worst). But hey, I'm fine with that.
Jul 20, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Jul 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jul 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
@Donutz
sex and the eye are two different concepts
eye -- development of an organ that occurred independently across many different species. The human eye and its genes have NO RELATION AT ALL genetically to many other species' eyes - this implies that this organ evolved in a totally separate and isolated way.
sex -- is a mechanism for reproduction that involves sharing of genes from at least two separate entities, for those genes to fuse and create a new unique individual of the same species. Sex/fertilization seems to work EXACTLY THE SAME across ALMOST ALL species that produce sexually, one partner is either a carrier or producer of an egg that receives foreign DNA to complete the offspring.
the only thing that hints that his may be easy or a normal factor is because almost everything on earth does it.