Being 'secondary' is important for a Webb Telescope mirror

Jul 20, 2011 By Rob Gutro
The secondary mirror (shown here) was polished at the L3 Integrated Optical Systems - Tinsley in Richmond, Calif. to accuracies of less than one millionth of an inch. That accuracy is important for forming the sharpest images when the mirrors cool to -400°F (-240°C) in the cold of space. The Webb's secondary mirror was recently completed, following polishing and gold-coating. Credit:NASA/Ball Aerospace/Tinsley

(PhysOrg.com) -- "Secondary" may not sound as important as "primary" but when it comes to the next-generation James Webb Space Telescope a secondary mirror plays a critical role in ensuring the telescope gathers information from the cosmos. The Webb's secondary mirror was recently completed, following polishing and gold-coating.

There are four different types of mirrors that will fly on the James Webb Space Telescope, and all are made of a light metal called beryllium. It is very strong for its weight and holds its shape across a range of temperatures.

There are primary segments (18 total that combined make the large providing a collecting area of 25 meters squared/269.1 square feet), the secondary mirror, tertiary mirror and the fine steering mirror.

Unlike the primary mirror, which is molded into the shape of a hexagon, the secondary mirror is perfectly rounded. The mirror is also convex, so the reflective surface bulges toward a light source. It looks much like a curved mirror that you'll see on the wall near the exit of a parking garage that lets motorists see around a corner. This mirror is coated with a microscopic layer of gold to enable it to efficiently reflect (which is what the Webb telescope's cameras see). The quality of the secondary mirror surface is so good that the final convex surface at does not deviate from the design by more than a few millionths of a millimeter - or about one ten thousandth the diameter of a human hair.

"As the only convex mirror on the Webb telescope, the secondary mirror has always been recognized to be the hardest of all of the mirrors to polish and test, so we are delighted that its performance meets all specifications," said Lee Feinberg, Webb manager at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. Convex mirrors are particularly hard to test because light that strikes them diverges away from the mirror. Feinberg noted, "The Webb telescope convex secondary mirror is approximately the size of the Spitzer Space Telescope's primary mirror and is by far the largest convex cryogenic mirror ever built for a NASA program."

This image shows the four different types of mirrors on the Webb telescope. From left to right are: a primary mirror segment, the secondary mirror, tertiary mirror and the fine steering mirror. The bottom right shows an artist's conception of the Webb telescope optics with its 18 primary mirror segments.Credit: NASA/Ball Aerospace/Tinsley

It was data from the Spitzer's mirrors that helped make the decision to use beryllium for the Webb telescope mirrors. Spitzer's mirrors were also made of .

So why is this mirror so critical? Because the secondary mirror captures light from the 18 primary mirror segments and relays those distant images of the cosmos to the telescope's science cameras. The secondary mirror is mounted on folding "arms" that position it in front of the 18 primary mirror segments. The secondary mirror will soon come to NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. where it will be installed on the telescope structure. Then, as a complete unit, the telescope structure and mirrors will undergo acoustic and vibration testing.

The secondary mirror was developed at Ball Aerospace & Technology Corp. of Boulder, Colo. and the mirror recently completed polishing at the L3–IOS-Tinsley facility in Richmond, Calif. Northrop Grumman space Systems is the prime contractor on the Webb telescope program.

The is the world’s next-generation space observatory and successor to the Hubble Space Telescope. The most powerful ever built, Webb will observe the most distant objects in the universe, provide images of the very first galaxies ever formed and see unexplored planets around distant stars. The Webb is a joint project of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Canadian Space Agency.

Explore further: Cyanide ice in Titan's atmosphere

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

Cyanide ice in Titan's atmosphere

9 minutes ago

Gigantic polar clouds of hydrogen cyanide roughly four times the area of the UK are part of the impressive atmospheric diversity of Titan, the largest moon of Saturn, a new study led by Leiden Observatory, ...

Video: Alleged meteor caught on Russian dash cam (again)

3 hours ago

Thanks to the ubiquity of dashboard-mounted video cameras in Russia yet another bright object has been spotted lighting up the sky over Siberia, this time a "meteor-like object" seen on the evening of Saturday, Sept. 27.

User comments : 10

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

sstritt
3 / 5 (2) Jul 20, 2011
uh, am I gonna have to be the one to break the news to these guys?
BenjaminButton
5 / 5 (1) Jul 20, 2011
Ha I think so...such a shame though!
astro_optics
2.3 / 5 (3) Jul 20, 2011
If it ever makes it there...
2020
3 / 5 (4) Jul 20, 2011
HEAR me my young PADAWANS, fear not the dark side and let The Force be your guide! JWST fallen before the emperor it has not, if anything I have to say, never it will!

word-
flashgordon
3 / 5 (2) Jul 21, 2011
yes, such a shame the James Webb has been cancelled; i wonder what they'll do with all this almost complete hardware?
Vendicar_Decarian
1 / 5 (4) Jul 21, 2011
The Conservatives will do everything in their power to cancel this program and abolish NASA.

Abolishing NASA has been the long term goal of the Conservative movement for decades.

Deesky
5 / 5 (3) Jul 21, 2011
a secondary mirror plays a critical role in ensuring the telescope gathers information from the cosmos.

A somewhat more critical factor is not de-funding the project.
El_Nose
5 / 5 (3) Jul 21, 2011
my understanding was that it was going to be voted on but it had not been cancelled yet
that_guy
not rated yet Jul 21, 2011
Apparently El Nose and deesky are right. A committee headed by republicans has cleared it to be defunded, but obviously no budget has been agreed on...and this is one of the things still needed to be voted on. Stay tuned.
flashgordon
3 / 5 (2) Jul 21, 2011
Hopefully, when science is voted out in America, the scientists just migrate back to Europe and/or elsewhere and bring all their hardware with them; remember, Goddard's technical reports were bought by the Germans for pennys!