Surprising results in a new study on childbearing and education

July 4, 2011

In almost every country, women with more education have fewer children. But does education reduce childbearing, or does childbearing get in the way of education, or both? New research by Joel E. Cohen and colleagues in Norway found that, at least among a population of Norwegian women, childbearing impeded education more than education impeded childbearing. The surprising findings are reported online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

"These results suggest that women with advanced degrees have lower completed fertility on the average principally because women who have one or more children early are more likely to leave or not enter long educational tracks and never attain a high educational level," says Cohen, who is the Abby Rockefeller Mauzé Professor and head of the Laboratory of Populations at Rockefeller University and at Columbia University's Earth Institute.

Cohen and his co-authors, Øystein Kravdal and Nico Keilman from the University of Oslo, followed all the women born in Norway in 1964 through the end of their childbearing, using year-by-year data on , enrollment and reproduction.

"We did this study in because that's where we could get such beautiful data, not because that's where there's a big problem," Cohen says.

The researchers expected to find that women around 40 years old with more education bear fewer children mainly because education reduces childbearing. However, they found the opposite: women who have children early seem not to go on to higher education, much more than higher education reduces childbearing. "That's the main contribution of our paper," co-author Kravdal says. "We quantified the relative important of fertility for education and vice versa."

Cohen and his colleagues offer several possible policy implications based on their findings. For example, should women be discouraged from bearing children at an early age? The authors suggest that policy makers could recognize that early childbearing may be a result of decisions made by well-informed individuals. On the other hand, if society places a large value on education that is inadequately taken into account through individuals' decision making, policies could be adopted that discourage people from having at an early age.

In addition, if women underestimate how much childbearing interferes with further education — along with potentially adverse consequences for their long-term quality of life — then a case could be made that it would be a good idea to create more awareness about the educational consequences of early childbearing.

Finally, a policy could be implemented that offset the effect of on education by, for example, lowering the cost of child care for students who are mothers. Such a policy, the authors say, could in principle make more interested in having a child early; however, it would increase the educational levels for those who would have a child (whether wanted or not) while they are still young, with potentially beneficial effects also on others' well-being.

"We discussed the policy implications at length, but with hesitation because more and better analyses need to be done, especially in developing countries," says Cohen.

More information: "Childbearing impeded education more than education impeded childbearing among Norwegian women," by Joel Cohen, Øystein Kravdal, and Nico Keilman, PNAS.

Provided by Rockefeller University search and more info website

3.8 /5 (4 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

rwinners
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
This is simple. I'm not even going to get into the discussion. Parenthood has a negative effect on the single parent's prospects for future education. It does not prevent it, but only the very motivated will succeed to their ability.
To complete the argument, once educated, a human being understands the value of establishing a 0 growth policy around the world.
ziprar2
Jul 05, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
To complete the argument, once educated, a human being understands the value of establishing a 0 growth policy around the world.


0 growth? That means a couple can have two children... clearly the women in Norway are poorly educated.
rwinners
Jul 05, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
lol. Well "more likely to understand the value of establishing a 0 growth policy". Native custom survives.
Still, look at the oldest of the developed nations and it appears that something to do with education. Of course, education brings employment and security which, I believe, have a negative bearing on child production.
Bob_B
Jul 05, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Let's not forget the religious aspect, no birth control = more kids. Religion = less birth control. Religion (in many ways) = less education. Therefore, end religions and the world will become more educated, therefore less populated. Simple.
Ricochet
Jul 05, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I must point out the fact that this only serves to point out the disturbing revelations proposed by the movie Idiocracy...
Now, let's explore the "why" to these findings...

More education = higher-paying job = more stress = less time to mingle, meet people, marry, have kids

Having kids earlier = need for more money = working whatever jobs you can get, or marrying well = less time to study

Unless you can have kids and also have family to help raise them, the typical woman will have to do what she can to supply for them, and they will often find themselves without the time, nor the money to seek any higher education.

On the flipside, women who seek higher careers will find themselves with more education, thus a job that demands much more from tem, and can severly limit their ability to "have the time" to have a kid, etc...
hb_
Jul 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The study doesn't really show anything.

The authors completely ignores the difference between cause and effect. A woman that is highly career oriented may choose not to have children at an earlier age in favor of her education. The reduction in number of children may therefore be caused by her lack of interest in children, rather than her lack of time.

The opposite effect could influence the early mothers. Someone who willingly has a child at an age of 20 is probably not geared towards making a career. Thus, she might not have entered a higher education at a later age even if she had no children.

Sadly, this is typical of how sociologist make their studies: ignore anything that does not speak in favour of their hypothesis. Since their peer-reviers are equally inept in thinking logically, the probability of getting caught is virtually zero.
rwinners
Jul 19, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
You miss the point, hb. This is about numbers, not individuals. In the US (and other developed countries), the number of children born to women of child bearing age has been in steady decline for decades.
hb_
Jul 20, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The "numbers" - as you call it - is not the principal finding of the researchers.

They claim that the reduction in education for the early mothers is a consequence of them having had children early on, and that this effect is more pronounced than the reduction of children of the women that allready have a university degree.

My point is that we don't really know if the early mothers do not pursue an academic degree because the are more family oriented - as shown by their preference to form a family early on - or if it is due to the difficulties of studying and raising children at the same time.

It would have been straightforward to test the IQ of the mothers from the different groups, and only a bit more difficult to measure their "drive" and "ambition" in some psychological test.

But, of course, we cannot really expect social "scientists" to let intellectual honesty get in the way of obtaining "results"...
Ricochet
Jul 22, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
It's probably a bit of both reasons for women not pursuing higher education after having kids, early or not... The fact is that it's much more difficult, both time/energy and financially, to raise kid(s) AND get a degree at the same time. Both endeavors demand a lot of attention and money, and if you ask them which is more important, the kid or the education, they will almost always choose the kid.
Rank 3.8 /5 (4 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Consumption rivalry
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Bilateral trade between all countries
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Is the economic foundation of social media in jeopardy?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • Psychology: Rosenthal and Hawthorne Effect
    createdMay 15, 2012
  • Is GDP and National Income the Same Thing?
    createdMay 13, 2012
  • Difference between hourly wage and real GDP per hour worked?
    createdMay 12, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - Social Sciences

More news stories

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (16) | comments 136

Ancient Bethlehem seal unearthed in Jerusalem

Israeli archaeologists have discovered a 2,700-year-old seal that bears the inscription "Bethlehem," the Israel Antiquities Authority announced Wednesday, in what experts believe to be the oldest artifact ...

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.5 / 5 (14) | comments 23

Oldest Jewish archaeological evidence on the Iberian Peninsula

German archaeologists of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena found one of the oldest archaeological evidence so far of Jewish Culture on the Iberian Peninsula at an excavation site in the south of Portugal, ...

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (4) | comments 12

Dollars and sense: Why are some people morally against tax?

As the U.S. presidential election campaigns heat up, the economic debate is dominated by bailouts, austerity and, inevitably, taxation. Now a new study published in Symbolic Interaction asks why tax is such an important issue ...

Other Sciences / Social Sciences

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3 / 5 (2) | comments 12

Oldest art even older

New dates from Geißenklösterle Cave in Southwest Germany document the early arrival of modern humans and early appearance of art and music.

Other Sciences / Archaeology & Fossils

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (3) | comments 6


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...