When it comes to population growth, Houston is No. 1 (w/ video)

"Houston's growth represents more people than the population growth in the New York and Chicago metropolitan areas combined during the past decade," said Michael Emerson, co-director of the Kinder Institute. "Houston's growth alone accounts for more people than the nation's 14 smallest metropolitan areas combined. It is more than the number of people who live in the Buffalo metropolitan area, and more than in the New Orleans metropolitan area -- and it is more than the number of people in 322 of the nation's 366 metropolitan areas."

While 42 of the nation's metropolitan areas actually lost population, Emerson said, Houston capitalized on its closeness to Latin America, its emergence as a major destination for immigrants from around the world, the area's pro-business policies, low cost of living, significant job growth and location in the fastest-growing state in the nation.

Following closely behind Houston is another Texas giant, the Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan area, which grew by just 21,000 fewer people over the decade than Houston. If the growth of two other Texas metropolitan areas -- Austin and San Antonio – is factored in, only 13 other metropolitan areas in the country have as many people as these four metropolitan areas added to their populations over the decade. Austin grew by almost 467,000 people and San Antonio by about 431,000, which put them both in the top 13 metropolitan areas for population growth.

"As of 2011, the population increases in the Houston and Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan areas have catapulted the two cities into the No. 5 (Houston) and No. 4 (Dallas-Fort Worth) largest metropolitan areas in the United States," Emerson said.

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

The trend of U.S. population growth being concentrated in the South and the Southwest -- which has been true for several decades -- continues and, if anything, is intensifying, Emerson said. Of the 15 metropolitan areas that added the most people, only New York (No. 7) and Seattle (No. 15) are not in the South or the Southwest.

"A significant portion of the population growth in these Southern and Southwestern metropolitan areas is not due to the relocation of Americans from colder climates but to the influx of immigrants moving directly into these Southern and Southwestern metropolitan areas," Emerson said. "This is the secret of Houston's phenomenal growth over the past decade. It comes not primarily from relocating or retiring Americans but from first-generation immigrants and from their children born in Houston."

The researchers' analysis is based on the official Census Bureau definition: "The general concept of a metropolitan area is that of a large population nucleus, together with adjacent communities having a high degree of social and economic integration with that core. Metropolitan areas comprise one or more entire counties, except in New England, where cities and towns are the basic geographic units."

The 30 U.S. metropolitan areas with the greatest population growth, 2000-2010

1. Houston 1,231,393
   
2. Dallas-Fort Worth 1,210,229
   
3. Atlanta 1,020,879
   
4. Riverside, Calif. 970,030
   
5. Phoenix 941,011
   
6. Washington, D.C. 785,987
   
7. Las Vegas 575,504
   
8. New York 574,107
   
9. Miami 557,071
   
10. Orlando, Fla. 489,850
    
11. Austin, Texas 466,526
    
12. Los Angeles 463,210
    
13. San Antonio 430,805
    
14. Charlotte, N.C. 427,590
    
15. Seattle 395,931
    
16. Tampa/St. Petersburg, Fla. 387,246
    
17. Denver 364,242
    
18. Chicago 362,789
    
19. Sacramento, Calif. 352,270
    
20. Raleigh/Cary, N.C. 333,419
    
21. Minneapolis/St. Paul 311,027
    
22. Portland, Ore. 298,128
    
23. San Diego 281,480
    
24. Philadelphia 278,196
    
25. Nashville, Tenn. 278,145
    
26. Indianapolis 231,137
    
27. Columbus, Ohio 224,217
    
28. Jacksonville, Fla. 222,846
    
29. San Francisco/Oakland 211,651
    
30. McAllen, Texas 205,306

Provided by Rice University