New planet discovered in Trinary star system

Jul 14, 2011 By Jon Voisey
A planet 6 times the mass of Earth orbits around the star Gliese 667 C, another member of a triple star system. Credit: ESO

Until recently, astronomers were highly skeptical of whether or not planets should be possible in multiple star systems. It was expected that the constantly varying gravitational force would eventually tug the planet out of orbit. But despite doubts, astronomers have found several planets in just such star systems. Recently, astronomers announced another, this time in the trinary star HD 132563.

The detection of the new planet came as part of a larger study on the trinary star system spanning 10 years. The two main stars that comprise the system are both similar to the Sun in mass, although somewhat less prevalent in metals, and orbit each other at a distance of around 400 AU. The main star, HD 132563A is also itself, a binary. This fact was not previously recognized and also reported by the team, led by Silvano Desidera from the in Padova, Italy.

The newly discovered planet orbits the secondary star in the system, HD 132563B. As with the binary component of the main star, the new planet was discovered spectroscopically. The planet is at least 1.3 times the mass of Jupiter, with an average distance from its of 2.6 AU, and an moderately high eccentricity of 0.22.

The team also attempted to image the planet directly using from the Italian Telescopio Nazionale Galileo. While there was a hint in the glare of the star that may have been the planet in question, the team could not rule out that the detection was not an instrumental effect.

With the discovery of this new planet, the total number of discovered planets in lies at eight. while this is rather small numbers from which to draw firm conclusions, it appears that planets can be commonly found orbiting the more remote members of trinary star systems for good periods of time. On the shorter end, the is anticipated to be 1-3 billion years in aged, based on the amount of stellar activity and amount of lithium present in the star’s atmosphere (which decreases with time). However, fitting of the mass and luminosity onto isochrones suggest the stars may be as much as 5 billion years in age. In either situation, the planetary system is dynamically stable.

Also based on these eight systems, the team also suggests that planets existing around such far removed members of a multiple may be as common as planets around wide binaries, or even single stars.

Explore further: Possible bright supernova lights up spiral galaxy M61

Related Stories

Planetary systems can form around binary stars

Jan 10, 2006

New theoretical work shows that gas-giant planet formation can occur around binary stars in much the same way that it occurs around single stars like the Sun. The work is presented today by Dr. Alan Boss of ...

How to weigh a star using a moon

Oct 15, 2010

How do astronomers weigh a star that's trillions of miles away and way too big to fit on a bathroom scale? In most cases they can't, although they can get a best estimate using computer models of stellar structure.

Richest planetary system discovered (w/ Video)

Aug 24, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers using ESO's world-leading HARPS instrument have discovered a planetary system containing at least five planets, orbiting the Sun-like star HD 10180. The researchers also have tantalising ...

Astronomers find 'snooker star system'

Nov 09, 2010

Astronomers at The University of Warwick and the University of Sheffield have helped discover an unusual star system which looks like, and may even once have behaved like, a game of snooker.

Recommended for you

Possible bright supernova lights up spiral galaxy M61

5 hours ago

I sat straight up in my seat when I learned of the discovery of a possible new supernova in the bright Virgo galaxy M61. Since bright usually means close, this newly exploding star may soon become visible ...

Fifteen years of NASA's Chandra X-ray observatory

5 hours ago

This Chandra X-ray Observatory image of the Hydra A galaxy cluster was taken on Oct. 30, 1999, with the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) in an observation that lasted about six hours.

Confirming a 3-D structural view of a quasar outflow

6 hours ago

A team of astronomers have observed a distant gravitationally-lensed quasar (i.e., an active galactic nucleus) with the Subaru Telescope and concluded that the data indeed present a 3-D view of the structure ...

Hubble sees 'ghost light' from dead galaxies

21 hours ago

(Phys.org) —NASA's Hubble Space Telescope has picked up the faint, ghostly glow of stars ejected from ancient galaxies that were gravitationally ripped apart several billion years ago. The mayhem happened ...

When did galaxies settle down?

Oct 30, 2014

Astronomers have long sought to understand exactly how the universe evolved from its earliest history to the cosmos we see around us in the present day. In particular, the way that galaxies form and develop ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Waterdog
4.3 / 5 (4) Jul 14, 2011
Could this planet be in the liquid water range? It's only about half again as far out as Mars and the star is a little hotter than the sun (~250 K). If the planet or a large satellite had a lot of CO2 or methane in its atmosphere, who knows. Maybe life could exist there.
eachus
4.5 / 5 (8) Jul 14, 2011
You are better off hoping for a large moon. The planet is larger (well heavier) than Jupiter. The extra warmth from both having a large (primary) planet in the sky and tidal heating should make life possible.

Also, I've stopped worrying about whether there are habitable xenoplanets. There are plenty of them, and by the time that fact becomes important, the populations of Mars, Venus, the moon, and the asteroid belt should each be on the order of Earth's population today. (I left out the moons of the outer planets, and for that matter the moons of Mars. They may be populated at some point in the future, but I don't see them with populations in the billions.)

So when we reach the stars, our idea of what constitutes a habitable planet will have stretched a lot.
FrankHerbert
1.7 / 5 (6) Jul 14, 2011
Just imagine how much fun Ptolemy would have had had we lived on the moon instead.
ptglj
not rated yet Aug 09, 2011
"There are plenty of them, and by the time that fact becomes important, the populations of Mars, Venus, the moon, and the asteroid belt should each be on the order of Earth's population today"

You don't know much about Venus if you think any life would ever be possible there. The temperature there is far hotter than on Mercury because of the the densely thick sulfuric acid clouds that cause a greenhouse effect and create an 800º+ F surface temperature.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.