Rising oceans - too late to turn the tide?
July 15, 2011 By Daniel Stolte
If sea levels rose to where they were during the Last Interglacial Period, large parts of the Gulf of Mexico would be under water (red areas), including half of Florida and several Caribbean islands. (Photo illustration by Jeremy Weiss)
Melting ice sheets contributed much more to rising sea levels than thermal expansion of warming ocean waters during the Last Interglacial Period, a UA-led team of researchers has found. The results further suggest that ocean levels continue to rise long after warming of the atmosphere has leveled off.
Thermal expansion of seawater contributed only slightly to rising sea levels compared to melting ice sheets during the Last Interglacial Period, a University of Arizona-led team of researchers has found.
The study combined paleoclimate records with computer simulations of atmosphere-ocean interactions and the team's co-authored paper is accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters.
As the world's climate becomes warmer due to increased greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, sea levels are expected to rise by an estimated three feet by the end of this century.
But the question remains: How much of that is due to melting ice sheets and also the expansion of the oceans' 332 billion cubic miles of water increasing in volume as they warm up?
For the study, UA team members analyzed paleoceanic records of global distribution of sea surface temperatures of the warmest 5,000-year period during the Last Interglacial, a warm period that lasted from 130,000 to 120,000 years ago.
The researchers then compared the data to results of computer-based climate models simulating ocean temperatures during a 200-year snapshot as if taken 125,000 years ago and calculating the contributions from thermal expansion of sea water.
The team found that thermal expansion could have contributed no more than 40 centimeters less than 1.5 feet to the rising sea levels during that time, which exceeded today's level by about eight meters or 26 feet.
At the same time, the paleoclimate data revealed average ocean temperatures only about 0.7 degrees Celsius, or 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit, above those of today.
"This means that even small amounts of warming may have committed us to more ice sheet melting than we previously thought. The temperature during that time of high sea levels wasn't that much warmer than it is today less than two degrees Celsius," said Nicholas McKay, a doctoral student at the UA's department of geosciences and the paper's lead author.
McKay pointed out that even if ocean levels rose to similar heights, they would do so very gradually, on the order of three feet per century.
"The atmosphere is warming faster than the oceans. They are absorbing most of that heat, but they lag behind. Especially the large ice sheets are not in equilibrium with global climate," McKay added. "Even if we stopped greenhouse gas emissions right now, the Earth would keep warming, the oceans would keep warming, and sea levels would keep rising for a long time."
Jonathan Overpeck, co-director of the UA's Institute of the Environment and a professor with joint appointments in the department of geosciences and atmospheric sciences, said: "This study marks the strongest case yet made that humans by warming the atmosphere and oceans are pushing the Earth's climate toward the threshold where we will likely be committed to four to six or even more meters of sea level rise in coming centuries."
Overpeck, who is McKay's doctoral advisor and a co-author of the study, added: "Unless we dramatically curb global warming, we are in for centuries of sea level rise at a rate of up to one meter or more per century, with the bulk of the water coming from the melting of the great polar ice sheets both the Greenland and Antarctic Ice Sheets."
According to the authors, the new results imply that 4.1 to 5.8 meters, or 13.5 to 19 feet, of sea level rise during the Last Interglacial period was derived from the Antarctic Ice Sheet, "reemphasizing the concern that both the Antarctic and Greenland Ice Sheets may be more sensitive to temperature than widely thought."
"The central question we asked was, What are the warmest 5,000 years we can find for all these records, and what were the highest sea levels reached during that time?'" McKay said.
Evidence for elevated sea levels is scattered all around the globe, he added. On Barbados and the Bahamas, for example, notches cut by waves into the rock six or more meters above the present shoreline have been dated to being 125,000 years old.
"Based on previous studies, we know that the sea level during the Last Interglacial probably reached about 8.5 meters above today," McKay explained.
"We already knew that the vast majority came from the melting of the large ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica, but how much could the expansion of seawater have added to that?"
Given sea surface temperatures were about 0.7 degrees warmer than today, the team calculated that even if the warmer temperatures reached all the way down to 2,000 meters more than 6,500 feet, which is highly unlikely expansion would have accounted for no more than 40 centimeters, less than a foot and a half.
"That means almost all of it must have come from the large ice sheets, plus a small contribution from melted mountain glaciers and small ice caps," McKay said.
According to co-author Bette Otto-Bliesner, senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) in Boulder, Colo., getting the same estimate of the role ocean expansion played on sea level rise increases confidence in the data and the climate models.
"The models allow us to attribute changes we observe in the paleoclimate record to the physical mechanisms that caused those changes," Otto-Bliesner said. "This helps tremendously in being able to distinguish mere correlations from cause-and-effect relationships."
The authors cautioned that past evidence is not a prediction of the future, mostly because global temperatures during the Last Interglacial were driven by changes in the Earth's orbit around the sun. However, current global warming is driven by increasing greenhouse gas concentrations.
In addition, seasonal differences between the northern and the southern hemispheres were much more pronounced during the Last Interglacial than they are today.
"We expect something quite different for the future because we're not changing things seasonally, we're changing things everywhere," McKay said.
"The question is, when we think about warming on a global scale and letting the climate system come to an equilibrium, what would we expect based on the paleoclimate record? The Last Interglacial is the most recent time when sea levels were much higher and it's a time for which we have lots of data," McKay added.
"The message is that the last time glaciers and ice sheets melted, sea levels rose by more than eight meters. Most of the world's population lives relatively close to sea level. This is going to have huge impacts, especially on poor countries," he added.
"If you live a meter above sea level, it's irrelevant what causes the rise. Whether sea levels are rising for natural reasons or for anthropogenic reasons, you're still going to be under water."
Provided by
University of Arizona
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
14 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
35
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (12)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (20)
Glaciers have been melting off and on for 10000 years. Why does Glacier Melt cause concern? Because it can be used to scare gullible voters into voting for things that will keep AGW supporters in power and money.
"The Polar Bears will be fine." - Freeman Dyson
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (17)
Humans can walk. They have done so before. Any change will be so slow as to be unnoticed unless compared to what has come before.
New Orleans under 3 meters of water isn't necessarily a bad thing?
"What a terrible thing to say"
Have you ever been to New Orleans?
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (13)
And yeah i know the "green" nuts will talk about Solar , but it's way too expensive and it works only 10 hours a day. They have no solution apart from their longterm agenda - sending us back to the stone age.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (15)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (14)
Stop spewing nonsense - take a look at this quote.
Our largest deal weve ever announced was in January of this year with Southern California Edison thats incredible, that is a 711 megawatt deal; its two power plants in different parts of the state. And whats incredible is that those contracts are below the cost of natural gas.
Full article http://cleantechn...hnica%29
Solar is here now - it is cost competitive - with salt storage - it can produce power 24/7 and the price will only continue to fall.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (19)
Another quote from Freeman Dyson. "One of the main causes of warming is the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere resulting from our burning of fossil fuels such as oil and coal and natural gas."
1. 68% of all fresh water in the world is found in icecaps and glaciers.
2. In Europe there are 196 million people living in coastal regions. Also, 53% of the population of the USA live in coastal counties.
Unless you are the God of logistics, cheap building materials, and mass persuasion, your concept of having people simply move is ridiculous.
Yes, that actually is a terrible thing to wish upon anyone. Having your life destroyed, even if you can restart and rebuild, would 100% suck.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (10)
Because prevention is always better than protection? You only need to prevent once - but you need to protect continually.
The former seems a _lot_ cheaper than the latter in the long run.
Maybe you should check in at physorg more often. This article was posted not 5 days ago which shows the opposite:
http://www.physor...urs.html
(and taking all ancillary costs - like storage of wastes - nuclear is WAY more expensive than any other form of energy production per Watt produced)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (13)
Ignoring this problem is not only ignorant, its criminal.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (8)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Until we develop interstellar travel all bets are off regarding human extinction.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
Change in earth's mass? How would melting change earth's mass?
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (13)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.9 / 5 (8)
Have you studied differential equations?
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (7)
Even the best among us have been known to be wrong from time to time. I cannot say I trust this assessment even coming from Freeman Dyson.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (14)
Orbit tilts back, eventually GHG levels fall again, new ice age. CO2 levels about 180 ppmv. Lasts another 120,000 years.
No-one has any certainty what happens if you take earth's CO2 levels ups to like 400 ppmv as present, or much higher, say another 100 years of this stupidity. But all indications are it should rapidy get nasty. Droughts on farmlands, dramatic weather events, rich river delta farmlands flooded by seawater
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (16)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (12)
Just move. You have a lifetime.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (14)
190 meters (390ft) of sea-level rise in the last 10000 years.
And you want me to worry about another fraction of a meter?
Not gonna do it, even if New Orleans, Holland and Bangladesh end up submerged. Building below sea level is always stupid, if you're near the sea.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (13)
156 million people in Bangladesh - just tell them all to move - wonder where you would suggest they move to - and with what resources. Do you care about anyone else besides yourself Shootist? It sure does not seem that way.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (12)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (9)
A lifetime would still not be enough to move half a billion people to a new place. While I agree with you that building below sea-level is a poor idea the current location of cities is totally out of our control. The world's biggest and oldest cities that are located on the coast are located there for a very good historical reason. They were ports and places of commerce. Because of this they grew in size as they were the primary places for someone to be employed. People did not have any idea of the potential risks centuries in the future that could arise by urbanizing near the coast.
As for the "Just move". I don't understand how you can't see the enormity of the task. Half a billion people and trillions of dollars of GDP would have to be moved. That is epic. While good in individual theory it is terrible in mass application.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (8)
Sounds like you think you will not have to move? I suppose then one morning you will wake up and everyone that has moved will now reside in your home.
Seems that you place no faith in the adage "an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure."
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Hmmm...Antarctic ice cores not heard of have you?
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
To paraphrase, the info is out there; it should not be particularly difficult for you to find.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (16)
So kick back and relax.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Of course, you will be "pressured" to save as many as possible during the time you seek the silver bullet to climate.
Preventive medicine normally has a complete knowledge of the underlying mechanisms and causes.
An ounce of prevention is worth of pound of cure.
Of course knowing the cure is the ideal perquisite for any ounce of prevention.
Is removing CO2 the cure? Where? When? How much? How? How fast? With what? Etc., etc.
With no stretch of the imagination, imagine being able "... to distinguish mere correlations from cause-and-effect relationships." - Otto-Bliesner.
Before inserting the needle into the body of the earth, have research back up a chance that doctors give themselves when applying their training in intensive care.
We have never treated climate before.
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (6)
http://www.great-.../2006354
"Based on the most current data it appears that 2010 is going to show the largest drop in global sea level ever recorded in the modern era."
http://wattsupwit...in-2010/
"Gatekeepers of our sea level data are manufacturing a fictitious sea level rise that is not occurring,"
http://www.foxnew...el-data/
"So how are the V&R2009 predictions holding up?
...not well. ...the observations showed an actual sea level rise that is below the lowest of the V&R2009 estimates from the lowest of the IPCC scenarios.
Actual observations are lower by four standard deviations than the V&R2000 best estimate, and are two standard deviations lower than their lower estimate."
http://www.worldw...a-level/
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
HA! You 'fraid to get wet?"
-Davey Jones, Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
http://www.great-.../2006354
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (13)
Yes. It should be defunded, . . .
If it continues to support manipulation or distortion of the scientific process by the likes of James Hansen.
If you don't understand, read Bob Carter's paper on "Lysenkoism and James Hansen" and the forward by Vaclav Klaus:
"Todays debate about global warming is essentially a debate about freedom. The environmentalists would like to mastermind each and every possible (and impossible) aspect of our lives."
www.quadrant.org....alarmism
I urge Congress to cut all funds for such Lysenkoism nonsense!
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I think he was talking about increase on moment of inertia.
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
So were the icecaps to melt completely, this would slow down the rotation of earth slightly ? Our planet is an oblate spheroid ( squashed sphere ), so the volume of the melted water would settle towards the equatorial bulge ? Or no ? I remember China's 3 Gorges dam supposedly slowed earth's rotation by ~ 60 billionths of a sec, although this seem's to be heavily argued.
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 2.4 / 5 (8)
No, it isn't. And despite your obvious wish that it were otherwise, as long as sane, informed, and freedom-loving minds abound, you will continue to be incorrect about this.
Yes you can, if you have a lifetime to do it. But there's no need to. The oceans won't rise as the alarmists are predicting, plus river deltas self-modify over time (which is how they formed in the first place), and since you mentioned the Nile Delta I should point out that it is already farmed to capacity and humans have been irrigating parts of the desert for agriculture for quite some time. Those efforts are increasing and will continue to do so with or without a sea-level rise.
Regardless, we'll adapt.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
I assume you've chosen your username from the film with John Wayne, who's attitude you attempt to emulate. By most Hollywood insider accounts, John Wayne was gay. The macho stance is very often a thin veil for something else. Just figured you wouldn't want to be the last to know, Pilgrim.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Here is where you can check our current situation with regard to Mylankovitch Cycles.
http://en.wikiped...h_cycles
According to wikipedia:
"perihelion occurs during the southern hemisphere's summer and aphelion during the southern winter. Thus the southern hemisphere seasons should tend to be somewhat more extreme than the northern hemisphere seasons."
Yet the northern hemisphere is experiencing extreme seasonal variation, and the northern ice pack is the one in the most danger right now. So the Milankovitch cycle is not causing the melt at the north pole and in Greenland.
"Astronomical calculations show that 65° N summer insolation should increase gradually over the next 25,000 years."
"No declines in 65° N summer insolation, sufficient to cause a glacial period, are expected in the next 50,000 years."
So we shouldn't be worried about a orbital variations causing an ice age any time soon.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
Why? It's melted before.
IF you think there is going to be a catastrophe, go forth, warn the people. Tell them to move. And yes, a half a billion people, half of whom will be dead from old age, can migrate, if the need be great.
As for whether Dyson is wrong, or not. I trust a guess by Dyson, over any one of the 'facts' presented her.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
To Grosse Tete? I'm not white, boy, I'm a coonass, a Cajun, from the bayou. New Orleans is a stink hole, a pit of corruption, not fit for human habitation. Sure it has great music, but damn son, the music doesn't come from the city.
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
Pretty simple actually. If the ice is melting from the poles the water will redistribute into the lower lattitudes (sea level raising). This is mass redistribution. If you take a round mass and it transformes to a wider shape while maintaining the same rotational momentum it will slow its rotation - hence my question. Granted, I could have worded the question better.
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"Large deposits of phosphate from igneous rock are found in Canada, Russia, and South Africa. Deep-sea exploration of the worlds oceans has revealed that there are large deposits of phosphates on the continental shelf and on seamounts in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Recovering these deposits, however, is still too expensive, so they remain untouched for now. In the United States, phosphate rock is mined in Florida, North Carolina, Utah and Idaho. Florida and North Carolina account for approximately 85% of phosphate rock production in the United States. U.S. companies export large quantities of phosphate fertilizers all over the world. Phosphate rock is imported to the United States as well. Nearly all of these imports come from Morocco, a major supplier of phosphate rock to the world."
Phosphates aren't that rare.
Jul 23, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)