Ocean floor muddies China's grip on '21st-century gold'
July 3, 2011 by Richard Ingham
China's monopoly over rare-earth metals could be challenged by the discovery of massive deposits of these hi-tech minerals in mud on the Pacific floor, a study on Sunday suggests.
China accounts for 97 percent of the world's production of 17 rare-earth elements, which are essential for electric cars, flat-screen TVs, iPods, superconducting magnets, lasers, missiles, night-vision goggles, wind turbines and many other advanced products.
These elements carry exotic names such as neodymium, promethium and yttrium but in spite of their "rare-earth" tag are in fact abundant in the planet's crust.
The problem, though, is that land deposits of them are thin and scattered around, so sites which are commercially exploitable or not subject to tough environment restrictions are few.
As a result, the 17 elements have sometimes been dubbed "21st-century gold" for their rarity and value.
Production of them is almost entirely centred on China, which also has a third of the world's reserves. Another third is held together by former Soviet republics, the United States and Australia.
But a new study, published in the journal Nature Geoscience, points to an extraordinary concentration of rare-earth elements in thick mud at great depths on the Pacific floor.
Japanese geologists studied samples from 78 sites covering a major portion of the centre-eastern Pacific between 120 and 180 degrees longitude.
Drills extracted sedimentary cores to depths that in place were more than 50 metres (165 feet) below the sea bed.
More than 2,000 of these cores were chemically tested for content in rare-earth elements.
The scientists found rich deposits in samples taken more than 2,000 kilometres (1,200 miles) from the Pacific's mid-ocean ridges.
The material had taken hundreds of millions of years to accumulate, depositing at the rate of less than half a centimetre (0.2 of an inch) per thousand years. They were probably snared by action with a hydrothermal mineral called phillipsite.
At one site in the central North Pacific, an area of just one square kilometre (0.4 of a square mile) could meet a fifth of the world's annual consumption of rare metals and yttrium, says the paper.
Lab tests show the deposits can be simply removed by rinsing the mud with diluted acids, a process that takes only a couple of hours and, say the authors, would not have any environmental impact so long as the acids are not dumped in the ocean.
A bigger question is whether the technology exists for recovering the mud at such great depths -- 4,000 to 5,000 metres (13,000 to 16,250 feet) -- and, if so, whether this would be commercially viable.
In an email exchange with AFP, lead author Yasuhiro Kato, a professor of economic geology and geochemistry at the University of Tokyo, said the response from mining companies was as yet unknown, "because nobody knows the presence of the (rare-earth) -rich mud that we have discovered."
"I am not an engineer, just a geoscientist," Kato said. "But about 30 years ago, a German mining company succeeded in recovering deep-sea mud from the Red Sea. So I believe positively that our deep-sea mud is technologically developable as a mineral resource."
The market for rare-earth elements has tightened considerably over the last couple of years.
China has slashed export quotas, consolidated the industry and announced plans to build national reserves, citing environmental concerns and domestic demand.
These moves led to a fall of 9.3 percent in China's exports of rare-earth metals last year, triggering complaints abroad of strategic hoarding and price-gouging.
Japanese industry sources also said China temporarily cut off exports last year during a territorial row between Asia's two largest economies.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
14 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
35
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Yeah, right, leave the mining to the Tony Soprano Rare-Earth Recovery Company.
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (5)
This reminds me of arsenic epidemic in asian countries due to unrestricted draining of ground water.
Don't make similar catastrophe in fragile oceanic ecosystems.
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
Think about what will happen when drill machines/scoopers skim the mud.
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (5)
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
No kidding, the one thing they arent supposed to do is going to turn into the biggest drain on their profits leading them to lobby for softer regulation or they will just plain ignore the regulations all together.
Who's gonna catch them in the middle of the ocean....
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Dumping the (now mineral poor) mud though, is a huge potential problem. My guess though, is that the solution will be to leach the mud in situ. Drill one set of holes to put the acid in, pull the metals in solution out of another set.
May sound complex, but a lot cheaper than pulling up say 100 tonnes of mud for a hundred kilos of metals.
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
So why would the AUTHORS of this study mention it?:"would not have any environmental impact so long as the acids are not dumped in the ocean."
If you were mining offshore while bribing officials of a third world country or a banana republic, you might get away with it. But eventually someone would blow the whistle and you, considering the heat related to coral reef health, would have a lot of explaining to do.
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jul 03, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The acid would quickly ionise in water and disperse in to relatively harmless waste.
Jul 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jul 04, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jul 04, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I don't want to kneel before Emperor Ming, either. As much as I'd like to believe it, Flash Gordon, I'm not.
Jul 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
So how does increasing the price we pay for Chinese raw materials punish China?
Tariffs mean WE the importers pay a higher price.
Tariffs work when there are a several sources, and that's not the case.
That means we still have to pay tariffs.
Tariffs would only mean they can produce less and make the same amount of money.
Of course you may be referring to Chinese exports in general, well considering the massive imbalance in THEIR favor the developed world is currently running, we will suffer far more and quicker than China would from the imposition of tariffs.
Additionally China is rapidly developing its own internal markets, already #3 in the world. Tariffs would force China to look inward and develop even faster.
Jul 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I'm referring to increasing tariffs on ALL Chinese IMPORTS into the U.S., not raw materials. Obama increased a tariff on Chinese tires a couple of years ago, the Chinese complained, but did they stop sending their slave-made crap? Do you know about the mess Chinese sheetrock has created here? Economists predict all kinds of dire ramifications- increased consumer costs, loss of jobs, etc. Even the genius Alan Greenspan miscalculated the level of greed in the financial markets and realized that self governance is a pipe dream. I don't believe anyone's prognostications anymore. In fact, industrialists like GM and Ford, who are now paying a Chinese auto factory laborer 200 dollars per month want us to believe in this propaganda. Follow the money, and you'll see who the real winners in the "trade wars" are.
Jul 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Here's the catch 22 that makes me sure of that statement: If it's not really expensive to do it, then the price of the minerals falls to the point that it's not worth it any more.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Look up spectra rope. SPECTEC-12, as an example. 16500 feet of it at 1.25 inch diameter is....6000 lbs. Breaking strength is..a colossal 110,000lbs.
That is far from the strongest that can be made. The heavy lifting part is a done deal, so the rest needs a bit of work...