Nike, Adidas suppliers 'polluting China rivers'

Jul 13, 2011
Fishing boats are tied along the banks of the Yangtze river, China's longest and most economically important river. Environmental campaigners have accused suppliers to major clothing brands including Adidas and Nike of poisoning China's major rivers with hazardous chemicals linked to hormonal problems.

Environmental campaigners on Wednesday accused suppliers to major clothing brands including Adidas and Nike of poisoning China's major rivers with hazardous chemicals linked to hormonal problems.

Greenpeace said eight samples of wastewater discharge from two factories in the Yangtze and Pearl River deltas, identified as suppliers for the brands, contained "a cocktail of ".

The Yangtze -- China's longest river -- and the Pearl River Delta serve as a source of drinking water for about 67 million people, including those in Hong Kong, according to .

"Our tests of the wastewater found that have no place in our natural environment," Greenpeace campaigner Vivien Yau told a news conference in Hong Kong.

"We are calling on trendsetting brands that have major influence on their supply chains, such as Adidas, Nike and Li Ning to take the lead."

Li Ning is a popular Chinese sportswear brand.

"These brands have the ability and responsibility to work with their suppliers to provide products that do not irrevocably damage the environment and public health," added Yau.

Adidas offices in Hong Kong and Beijing could not be reached for comment by AFP while Nike disputed the environmental group's claims.

"To the best of our knowledge we are not contributing to pollution of the Yangtze Delta through our factory partners," Nike said in a statement to AFP, denying the use of the chemicals claimed by Greenpeace.

The Greenpeace report said laboratory testing found the wastewater samples contained nonylphenols and perfluorinated chemicals, which are used to make materials stain and stick resistant, among other uses.

The chemicals, which are restricted in European countries, could move up the food chain through fish and other marine life which have consumed the , Greenpeace said.

It said the chemicals could disrupt the hormone balance in humans even at low levels.

"We are not focusing on just the two companies identified in the report. We are saying this is just the tip of the entire iceberg," Greenpeace campaign manager Gloria Chang told AFP, urging Beijing to speed up regulatory reforms.

Explore further: Researchers question emergency water treatment guidelines

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

The greenest paper of them all

Mar 09, 2009

Wondering which paper towel or toilet paper is the greenest? The nonprofit advocacy group Greenpeace has released a pocket guide to paper products -- an updated version of the old National Resources Defense Council guide. ...

Greenpeace ranks 'greenest' electronics

Jan 06, 2011

Environmental group Greenpeace handed out grades Thursday to what it said were the world's "greenest" consumer electronics makers, as the annual gadget industry trade show opened here on Thursday.

New China pollution targets inadequate: Greenpeace

Jan 17, 2011

Environmental group Greenpeace on Monday praised China for setting new pollution targets but said the measures fell well short of what was needed to curb the country's world-beating carbon emissions.

Recommended for you

Researchers question emergency water treatment guidelines

13 hours ago

The Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) recommendations for treating water after a natural disaster or other emergencies call for more chlorine bleach than is necessary to kill disease-causing pathogens ...

European climate at the +2 C global warming threshold

15 hours ago

A global warming of 2 C relative to pre-industrial climate has been considered as a threshold which society should endeavor to remain below, in order to limit the dangerous effects of anthropogenic climate change.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
1 / 5 (1) Jul 14, 2011
Sorry, Greenpeace.

Your stories were once credible, but now ordinary members of the public are starting to see through emotional appeals to the political reasons for pollution stories,

http://anhonestcl...s-julia/

www.youtube.com/w...syg0lkkM

http://wattsupwit...a-medal/

As we approach the last play in this game, the world economy looks as fragile as the futures of Greenpeace, US President Barack Obama, and Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard!

Even the most noble goals do not justify deceptive means

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former Supporter of
Greenpeace, and the
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo

More news stories

Melting during cooling period

(Phys.org) —A University of Maine research team says stratification of the North Atlantic Ocean contributed to summer warming and glacial melting in Scotland during the period recognized for abrupt cooling ...