NASA needs new 'breakthrough,' says Obama
Space shuttle Atlantis on Pad 39A at Kennedy Space Center in Florida on July 5. NASA needs new technology breakthroughs to revitalize its mission to explore the universe, President Barack Obama said Wednesday as the shuttle Atlantis was preparing for its final mission.
NASA needs new technology breakthroughs to revitalize its mission to explore the universe, President Barack Obama said Wednesday as the shuttle Atlantis was preparing for its final mission.
Asked during his first-ever Twitter town hall meeting about where America stands in terms of space exploration with the shuttle program about to end after 30 years, Obama said he was "proud" of the past but eager for a new leap forward.
"We are still a leader in space exploration, but, frankly, I have been pushing NASA to revamp its vision," Obama said.
"The shuttle did some extraordinary work in low-orbit experiments, the International Space Station, moving cargo. It was an extraordinary accomplishment. And we're very proud of the work that it did," he added.
"But now what we need is that next technological breakthrough."
Obama, who axed NASA's Constellation program that would have returned astronauts to the moon, said that the United States should move beyond the space travel models it used in the 1960s for the Apollo program that first sent men to the moon.
"Rather than keep on doing the same thing, let's invest in basic research around new technologies that can get us places faster, allow human space flight to last longer," he said.
While private companies hustle to build a next generation spacecraft to tote astronauts to space again, the US space agency can spend time figuring out new ways to live longer in space and send explorers to Mars or an asteroid, he said.
"Let's start stretching the boundaries so we're not doing the same things over and over again. But rather, let's start thinking about, what's the next horizon? What's the next frontier out there?
"In order to do that, we'll need some technological breakthroughs that we don't have yet," said the US president.
Commercial companies may be able to make space travel more affordable for everyday people, while government-funded scientists focus on other work.
"Let's allow the private sector to get in so that they can, for example, send these low earth orbit vehicles into space, and we may be able to achieve a point in time where those of you who are just dying to go into space, you know, you can buy a ticket," said Obama.
"And a private carrier can potentially take you up there while the government focuses on the big breakthroughs that require much larger investments and involve much greater risk."
The space shuttle Atlantis is scheduled to make its final flight to the International Space Station later this week, though stormy weather could delay the mission by a couple of days, NASA said.
Once the shuttle program ends, the world's astronauts will have to rely on Russia to carry them to the ISS and back until private enterprise comes up with a next-generation US space capsule for cargo and crew.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
35
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Jul 06, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jul 06, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Jul 06, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Jul 06, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (10)
Jul 06, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 06, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jul 06, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
More like, emperor needs new clothes.
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Seriously, I don't think you have quite explored the full extent of what you are proposing. Unfortunately those things are well beyond our currently technological and engineering skills, I mean we can't even make a ship to carry us to the next planet never mind building something that can withstand, absorb and even store the power of the Sun.
Lets try to keep it real peeps.
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
http://appropriat...D=250023
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
WTF?! That's insane! Cut the frigging military budget already.
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
What is stopping companies from starting up and taking NASA's place? What was stopping them 30 years ago? Or are you proposing that the Government should have given NASA's resources and funds to a private business?
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
maybe the Govt scooping up all the breakthroughs for black ops programs?
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Here's the thing for all the "privatizers" to think about; there is no profit in space exploration at this time. We don't have near the technology to get to mineable space-resources or mine them if we could get there, so where does the private investment come from? Where are there hopes for return on investment? No where. The only private investment to be made right now in space is space-tourism and space-tourism is not going to get us beyond "space rocks". I hate to say it, but the kind of interstellar space travel we need to be looking at is still very much only a public interest right now. To believe private money will finance that at this point is ignoring economic law.
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
As a space privatizer, I agree with this. The money for manned space exploration will ultimately come mostly from public sources. But utilizing private companies will be more efficient.
NASA should set the overall goal (man on the moon/asteroid/mars or smaller milestones if needed), price, and let the market take its course. Similar to current COTS and CCDev programs. Political BS would be vastly reduced, and bang for the buck increased, IMHO.
Not to mention that the US already has three launch systems (Delta IV, Atlas V and Falcon 9) and one capsule (Dragon) flying, with other spaceships down the private pipe. Wasting years and billions on government alternatives is insanity.
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I worked on the Space Station and the NASA model is one engineer, ten engineering managers, twenty compliance twits plus more managers for the twits. And PR types. Lots of them.
Jul 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Tell that to Burt Rutan and Richard Branson.
Jul 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Okay, they are in space-tourism, not space exploration. Reading comprehension, friend.
Jul 08, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jul 08, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (6)
What's the difference? It's still providing access to space infrastructure and once you can do that profitably, extending it incrementally will lead to all kinds of opportunities, including harvesting of resources. You just need to think ahead.
Jul 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The difference is the technology, of course, which I realize you know. But the vastly different needs for deep-space exploration/exploitation vs. orbital or even moon or Mars tourism, I would imagine is quite different infrastructure and even science, really.
It's hard -for me anyway- to conceive of a realistic scenario of arriving at that, that doesn't involve some sort of public finance. Even if the public finance is to just determine that there is a market to be had, i.e. practically, reachable resources or habitable planet, etc.
What is the economic impetus that is going to allow industry to make that leap, when there is no market to leap to? Space-tourism would have to be wildly popular before the R&D could be afforded to develop such expensive technology that has no market, much less start-up of commercial operation. And given the liabilities of space travel (death), it's hard to imagine casual tourism being wildly popular, IMHO.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Inflatable modules, VASIMR drives and fuel depots could be done by Bigelow, AdAstra and ULA, respectively. These ideas are indeed innovative and would be very beneficial for our spaceflight capabilities. Not to mention that SpaceX has stated its aim to develop fully reusable launch vehicle in the future.
I am not sure if these ideas are truly revolutionary, but it indeed would be one heck of an evolutionary jump for spaceflight, IMHO, and certainly innovative.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)