Feds say Yellowstone cleanup will take more people

Jul 23, 2011 By MATTHEW BROWN , Associated Press
ExxonMobil cleanup workers remove bags of oil-covered vegetation from a side channel along the Yellowstone River near Billings, Mont. on Friday, July 22, 2011. After a pipeline spilled an estimated 1,000 barrels of oil into the river on July 1, receding floodwaters are revealing more contamination miles downstream from the spill site. (AP Photo/Matthew Brown)

(AP) -- Exxon Mobil Corp. will have to bring in more people to mop up oil from a broken pipeline beneath the Yellowstone River as receding floodwaters reveal new contamination, federal officials said Friday.

Also Friday, Montana environmental regulators said the pipeline may have leaked up to 1,200 barrels of into the scenic river. That equals 50,400 gallons and is 20 percent higher than prior estimates from Exxon Mobil.

on the Yellowstone have dropped six feet since the July 1 accident. Hundreds of logjams and debris piles, many coated in a layer of drying crude, now litter its banks and islands.

After burning the piles was rejected by state officials, representatives of the said Friday that oiled debris will have to be pulled apart, run through wood-chippers and hauled away.

EPA on-scene coordinator Craig Myers said that will take more people than the 750 Exxon Mobil now has in Montana for the spill.

"They're planning on ramping that up in short order," Myers said Friday as he toured an area along the river where dozens of were cutting down oil-fouled trees and plants.

Standing in front of a jumble of weathered wood smeared with crude, Myers said the prevalence of the piles "is going to change how many people Exxon has to get in here to deal with those."

Most of the work to date has been concentrated along a roughly 30-mile stretch of river from the spill site in Laurel downstream to east of Billings. Exxon Mobil spokeswoman Claire Hassett would not say how many more people might be brought in or whether that would speed a cleanup that the EPA wants done by Sept. 9.

"We intend to bring in the resources we need to ensure the cleanup is conducted efficiently and thoroughly," Hassett said.

The investigation into why the pipeline broke could take months to complete, officials have said.

Floodwaters pushed oil deep into back waters and side channels along the river, where trees are now ringed with oil several feet off the ground.

Crews also have found oil on numerous islands along the river. Myers said wood chippers and other equipment would be flown to those islands by helicopter, which would also be used to cart away oiled debris for disposal in out-of-state landfills.

A total number of sites with oil has not been established. Forty-six were found from the air in the first days after the spill. Since then, the government has stopped tallying individual sites, and it hasn't it been able to provide any mileage or acreage estimates for land and shoreline impacted by the spill.

The higher spill volume estimate of 50,400 gallons was based on the state's determination that the pipe did not just have a hole in it but was completely severed, said Mike Trombetta with the Montana Department of Environmental Quality.

did not immediately respond to an inquiry from The Associated Press about the higher volume.

The company this week told the EPA it has finished initial cleanup work on four or the original 46 sites. The Environmental Protection Agency and the state Department of Environmental Quality will assess whether the work was adequate.

State cleanup standards are stricter than federal rules, and DEQ officials say cleanup will continue until the work would do more harm than good to the environment

Also Friday, state officials said fish caught from the Yellowstone between Park City and Custer should not be eaten pending tests for toxins. Fish continue to accumulate oil in their system for about 40 days after oil gets into water, said Bob Gibson with Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks.

Results from tests on fish captured by wildlife agents this week are expected by early August. Those tests are likely to continue through the summer, Gibson said.

Explore further: China insists wealthy countries should improve emission targets

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Study focuses on communities near polluted waterways

Sep 03, 2014

There's no such thing as a good place to have a natural disaster, nor has there ever been an appropriate site to release toxic pollutants. But scientists have long recognized that some areas can handle such catastrophes better ...

Citizen scientists take on problem of Pacific plastics

Aug 11, 2014

In the classic 1967 movie, The Graduate, a newly minted college graduate played by Dustin Hoffman is told by an older friend that the future would be guided by "one word: plastics." Although the older man's ...

Cleanup of Mich. river oil spill will take months

Jul 31, 2010

(AP) -- Officials investigating the cause of a huge oil spill along a major river in southern Michigan say it will take months to clean up the mess, and damage to wetlands and wildlife may last considerably ...

Toxic river a bane to one in eight Argentines

Nov 05, 2013

Riachuelo, a densely populated river basin on the edge of Buenos Aires, is among the world's most polluted sites and has been targeted for clean-up after two centuries of stench.

Arkansas opens probe into ExxonMobil spill

Apr 02, 2013

Arkansas opened an investigation into an ExxonMobil pipeline that spilled thousands of gallons of crude and forced the evacuation of two dozen homes, the state's attorney general said Tuesday.

Recommended for you

Rio's Olympic golf course in legal bunker

18 hours ago

The return of golf to the Olympics after what will be 112 years by the time Rio hosts South America's first Games in 2016 comes amid accusations environmental laws were got round to build the facility in ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Howhot
not rated yet Jul 25, 2011
Hay GSWIFT7. Why don't you try a comment on this topic? I thought you where a defender of big oil.