It's dim up north
Skulls from the 1800s used in the study.
The farther that human populations live from the equator, the bigger their brains, according to a new study by Oxford University. But it turns out that this is not because they are smarter, but because they need bigger vision areas in the brain to cope with the low light levels experienced at high latitudes.
Scientists have found that people living in countries with dull, grey, cloudy skies and long winters have evolved bigger eyes and brains so they can visually process what they see, reports the journal Biology Letters.
The researchers measured the eye socket and brain volumes of 55 skulls, dating from the 1800s, from museum collections. The skulls represented 12 different populations from across the globe. The volume of the eye sockets and brain cavities were then plotted against the latitude of the central point of each individuals country of origin. The researchers found that the size of both the brain and the eyes could be directly linked to the latitude of the country from which the individual came.
Lead author Eiluned Pearce, from the Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary Anthropology in the School of Anthropology, said: "As you move away from the equator, there's less and less light available, so humans have had to evolve bigger and bigger eyes. Their brains also need to be bigger to deal with the extra visual input. Having bigger brains doesn't mean that higher latitude humans are smarter, it just means they need bigger brains to be able to see well where they live."
Co-author Professor Robin Dunbar, Director of the Institute of Cognitive and Evolutionary, said: Humans have only lived at high latitudes in Europe and Asia for a few tens of thousands of years, yet they seem to have adapted their visual systems surprisingly rapidly to the cloudy skies, dull weather and long winters we experience at these latitudes.
That the explanation is the need to compensate for low light levels at high latitudes is indicated by the fact that actual visual sharpness measured under natural daylight conditions is constant across latitudes, suggesting that the visual processing system has adapted to ambient light conditions as human populations have moved across the globe.
The study takes into account a number of potentially confounding effects, including the effect of phylogeny (the evolutionary links between different lineages of modern humans), the fact that humans living in the higher latitudes are physically bigger overall, and the possibility that eye socket volume was linked to cold weather (and the need to have more fat around the eyeball by way of insulation).
The skulls used in the study were from the indigenous populations of England, Australia, Canary Islands, China, France, India, Kenya, Micronesia, Scandinavia, Somalia, Uganda and the United States. From measuring the brain cavity, the research suggests that the biggest brains belonged to populations who lived in Scandinavia with the smallest being Micronesians.
This study adds weight to other research that has looked at the links between eye size and light levels. Other studies have already shown that birds with relatively bigger eyes are the first to sing at dawn in low light. The eyeball size across all primates has been found to be associated with when they choose to eat and forage with species with the largest eyes being those that are active at night.
Provided by
Oxford University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
16 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
15 hours ago |
3.4 / 5 (16) |
41
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
http://www.guardi...s-brains
A 20% eye diameter difference between the north pole and the equator. That's quite a lot for only 10,000 years!:
"Dunbar said the increase in brain volume must have evolved relatively recently in human history. "It's only within the last 10,000 years or so that modern humans have occupied all latitudes right up to the Arctic circle. This is, I guess, an adaptation that's happened within the last 10,000 years."
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
I am being a bit tongue in cheek, so don't take me too seriously.
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Altitude and its effects on selected risk factors of coronary heart disease
http://www.med.ui...dex.html
Might also be of interest
When Inuits are exposed to cold, the blood flow to their hands and feet rapidly increases.
Aborigines of Australia usually respond physiologically to the cold in a different way. Thick fat insulation develops around the vital organs of the chest and abdomen. In addition, their skin cools due to vasoconstriction at night. As a result, heat loss is reduced and the core body temperature remains at normal levels. However, the skin feels very cold.
rgds
James
Where are all the inellegent design... eh individuals?
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
After they saw this correlation they should have checked this(measuring the eyes actually) before to release the news.
after that they should check the actual size of the brain responsible for processing info from the eyes, maybe also to check the size of the retina, and the size of the optic nerve(its diameter ).
As the article itself says maybe it is just the more fat around the eyes that can explain this.
And the bigger brain is due to the bigger head and the bigger and more stocky body, which you need if you live so north.
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The most dangerous things to humans are other humans, so if you're a people living fat and easy, you're probably not going to be that sharp, but if you're constantly beset by war then you get good at it or you get yourself perished.
I'd like to see a study like this based on "historically adverse conditions" rather than latitude. I'm betting "Conquerors" and "historically oppressed but not eradicated minorities both show high intelligence.
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Scandinavian are typically taller than micronesian, and brain size is linked to body size.
Jul 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I was thinking along the lines of physical differences in lung capacity and size in comparison. Would there also be a size difference in the entire cardiovascular system?
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Because the eyes themselves don't fossilise?
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
http://rsbl.royal...570.full
Also, the study was limited to skulls in museums, and was not large enough to even attempt to study subtle differences between groups at similar lattitudes.
Visual acuity was confirmed to be independent of latitude, using living subjects.
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
There is a well known and studied population in the Andes Mountains that has significant variation in their cardiovascular system that allows them to tolerate high altitudes much better than the average population.
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
these people have evolved for living in the north first in Asia maybe for more than 30 000 years, you will see they have the best adaptation to cold weather, actually the population of the most north parts of scandinavia is mixed with such people, just because they are better adapted for cold.
We talk here about who have lived more long in cold areas, no who have arrived somewhere at some point.
Jul 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Yes I didnt knew that, thanks for the information, maybe I was thinking that in the 21st century we have the incredible technology to measure people's eyes without to stick them out with a spoon, but maybe we will live long enough to witness the development of this technology by NASA.
Or maybe there is some unwritten rule that only fossils should be used , and I just didnt knew that.
Jul 29, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 29, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
Jul 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
No!
If your ancestors had moved north many generations ago, your eyes would probably be bigger and more ensitive to light. That's all. The bigger cranium has to do mainly with thermoregulation (see ref. 37 in the RSP paper).
Jul 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Jul 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jul 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
No, you would have a smaller rooster. Countries that have higher GDP tend to have citizens with SMALLER manhoods. It's as if they are compensating for something.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Would that be to better see where to insert their tiny manhoods?
I don't think that lack of brains or visual acuity has very much at all to do with the failure of the political class to serve the public interest.
In fact, I would argue quite the opposite.
No disrespect intended, cyberCMDR.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
@Husky,
Now that you mention it...there always has been something creepy about those hairy-assed Neanderthals. Could it be that they were NOCTURNAL hunters? Possibly even VAMPYRES?
Could this be the reason for their sudden eradication from the face of Old Europe and Asia? Were they a plague that H S Sapiens had to eliminate in order to survive and prosper?
Of course, along the way, some of our ancestors were bound -it being human nature, afterall- to have put their manhoods into some of the ophthomegalic Neanderthalensis females.
Perhaps this accounts for the numerous crypto-vampires(currently resident in such places as the the Hamptons, Manhattan, Luxembourg, the Alps, the Cayman Islands, etc.) that have survived to continue to plague us to this very day