Put the brakes on using your brain power

Jul 29, 2011

German researchers have used drivers' brain signals, for the first time, to assist in braking, providing much quicker reaction times and a potential solution to the thousands of car accidents that are caused by human error.

Using (EEG) – a technique that attaches electrodes to the scalp –, the researchers demonstrated that the mind-reading system, accompanied with modern traffic sensors, could detect a driver's intention to break 130 milliseconds faster than a normal brake pedal response.

Driving at 100km/h, this amounts to reducing the braking distance by 3.66 meters - the full length of a compact car or the potential margin between causing and avoiding accidents.

The study, published today, 29 July 2011, in IOP Publishing's Journal of Neural Engineering, identified the parts of the brain that are most active when braking and used a driving simulator to demonstrate the viability of mind-reading assisted driving.

A detailed video of one of the subjects driving the simulator can be seen here.

As well as EEG, the researchers, from the Berlin Institute for Technology, also chose to examine myoelectric (EMG) activity which is caused by muscle tension in the lower leg and can be used to detect leg motion before it actually moves to the brake pedal.

Whilst sat among conventional driving controls, the study's 18 participants were asked to drive a car that was displayed on a screen in front of them whilst a series of electrodes were attached to their scalp to measure brain activity.

They were asked to stay within a 20 metre distance of a computer-controlled lead vehicle along a road that contained sharp curves and dense oncoming traffic, to recreate real driving conditions, whilst maintaining a speed of 100km/h.

At random intervals, emergency braking situations were triggered by the rapid braking of the lead vehicle in front, accompanied by the flashing of its braking lights.

At this point, when the subjects reacted, the data was collected from the EEG and EMG. For comparison, the researchers also recorded information on the time it took to release the gas pedal and press the brake pedal, the deceleration of both vehicles and the distance between the two vehicles.

Using the initial EEG recordings, the researchers were able to determine what parts of the brain are most sensitive in a braking scenario and therefore tweak the detection system accordingly.

A recent development, implemented into this study, are hybrid systems where external lasers and sensors are able to sense when a potential crash is upcoming so that as soon as the break pedal is touched, the vehicles goes into an emergency braking procedure; however these systems still rely on a human physical response, which is where a mind-reading system could benefit.

Lead author of the study Stefan Haufe said, "Averaged over all potential detection thresholds, a system that uses all available sensors detects emergency situations 130 milliseconds earlier than a system that doesn't use EEG and EMG. We can safely say that it is mainly that leads to the early detection.

"We are now considering to test the system online in a real car however if such a technology would ever enter a commercial product, it would certainly be used to complement other assistive technology to avoid the consequences of false alarms that could be both annoying and dangerous."

Explore further: Internet of things should be developable for all

More information: Stefan Haufe et al 2011 J. Neural Eng. 8 056001 doi: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/5/056001

Related Stories

Amazon's carbon uptake declines as trees die faster

Mar 18, 2015

The most extensive land-based study of the Amazon to date reveals it is losing its capacity to absorb carbon from the atmosphere. From a peak of two billion tonnes of carbon dioxide each year in the 1990s, ...

To avoid collisions, self-driving cars must communicate

Mar 12, 2015

Did you know some 33,000 people die and 2.3 million are injured in vehicle crashes in the U.S. each year?1 Researchers at Intel Labs are paving the road to a crash-free future with cars that communicate with each other.

Phone firms and the quest for the 5G Holy Grail

Mar 03, 2015

Lightning-quick downloads, driverless cars and remote surgery: telecom firms are racing to develop a new generation of "5G" mobile networks that could start to change the world in five years.

Recommended for you

Internet of things should be developable for all

21 hours ago

Within the next five to ten years, around 100 billion different devices will be online. A large part of the communication takes place solely between machines, and to ensure that they can communicate, the ...

Firm combines 3-D printing with ancient foundry method

Mar 27, 2015

A century-old firm that's done custom metal work for some of the nation's most prestigious buildings has combined 3-D printing and an ancient foundry process for a project at the National Archives Building in Washington, ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

PPihkala
not rated yet Jul 29, 2011
Too bad that tech like this (and ABS before it) tend to shift the breaking problem to the next car in line, the one without such tech installed.
Nik_2213
not rated yet Jul 29, 2011
Can it also detect 'false positives' like a mother-in-law who suddenly shrieks 'BRAKE !!' whenever she sees a possible threat ?
( Even one you spotted waaay back, and factored into your flight-plan ? ;-)
poof
not rated yet Jul 31, 2011
Can it also detect 'false positives' like a mother-in-law who suddenly shrieks 'BRAKE !!' whenever she sees a possible threat ?
( Even one you spotted waaay back, and factored into your flight-plan ? ;-)


sounds like she would be better off without brakes.
Magnette
not rated yet Aug 02, 2011
Many years ago I was very involved with the testing of a single pedal vehicle where the throttle and brake worked from the same pedal.
In testing we found that the braking distance on the single pedal vehicle was considerably shorter than that of the the two pedal car (identical vehicles). This was attributed to two facts. One was the physical...the actual movement of the foot from one pedal to the other and the other (lesser) was due to the brain only having to command that the pedal be pressed rather than the the foot moved across then pressing the pedal.
The biggest drawback to this system was the driver. Many years of driving two pedals creates habits which we demonstrated with distraction techniques on a test cycle that the drivers were unaware of. As soon as they were asked to brake whilst being distracted they immediately moved their foot to where the pedal should have been.

The human interface will always be a problem....

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.