Australia begins selling pollution tax
July 11, 2011 by Marc Lavine
Australia's prime minister Julia Gillard speaks in Canberra. The prime minister said a new carbon tax, which will be offset by a package of personal tax breaks, was needed to tackle carbon pollution in Australia, one of the world's biggest per capita carbon emitters.
Australia's Prime Minister Julia Gillard began Monday the mammoth task of selling a bold new tax on carbon emissions to sceptical voters, in a battle that could make or break her fragile rule.
But Gillard, who leads a shaky coalition government, immediately faced a furious reaction from industries targeted by the tax, with coal and ore miners, airlines and other businesses warning it could hobble the economy.
While Canberra insists the tax on the nation's 500 biggest polluters will help slow global warming and save natural treasures such as the Great Barrier Reef, opponents say it will have little effect on climate change but will cost taxpayers billions and force major industry to slash production and jobs.
"We've opted for the cheapest way of cutting carbon pollution," Gillard said on commercial television as she launched an election-style campaign to convince voters and big business of the necessity of action unveiled Sunday.
"At its core it really is quite simple, we at the moment put carbon pollution into our atmosphere for nothing, a big polluter can just keep chugging it up into the skies and not pay anything," she said.
"The core of this is those big polluters will pay a price, they're smart business people, when a bill comes in for carbon pollution they'll say, 'How can I reduce that bill, how can I change my processes so I generate less carbon pollution?'."
The prime minister said the new tax, which will be offset by a package of personal tax breaks, was needed to tackle carbon pollution in Australia, one of the world's biggest per capita carbon emitters.
Gillard on Sunday unveiled the carbon tax, which she had pledged during last year's election campaign not to introduce, setting the price at Aus$23 ($24.74) per tonne from July 1 next year to help battle climate change.
Under the plan, which is under heavy attack from the conservative opposition party, there will be a fixed price on carbon pollution until Asia-Pacific's largest emissions trading scheme to date is launched in 2015.
A protester holds a placard denouncing carbon tax during a rally in Sydney. Australia's Prime Minister Julia Gillard began Monday the mammoth task of selling a bold new tax on carbon emissions to sceptical voters, in a battle that could make or break her fragile rule.
The government faces a tough battle convincing voters, who polls have shown are resistant to the tax that is expected to increase consumer prices by 0.7 percent, and major industries are violently opposed to it.The coal industry came out with all guns blazing Monday, warning the new tax would force mine closures and cost thousands of jobs in the industry that is one of the major drivers of Australia's mineral exports-led economy.
"It's a regrettable policy," Ralph Hillman, executive director of the Australian Coal Association, told public broadcaster ABC.
"You are going to lose jobs in Australia, we calculate about 4,700 direct jobs (through closures of existing mines), but for no cuts in emissions," he said, casting doubt on the effectiveness of the scheme.
Gillard however said the coal industry would not be harmed and jobs would not be jeopardised.
"There will be growth in jobs in coal," she said. "The demand for coal will continue very strong. In terms of the impact of carbon pricing on coal mining the average impact is Aus$1.40 per tonne," she told commercial radio.
The Minerals Council said the plan would "take a baseball bat to the Australian economy", including a Aus$25 billion hit to mining, while doing little to reduce emissions.
Australia's biggest airline Qantas also weighed into the debate, saying it would cost the carrier some Aus$110 million-Aus$115 million in its first year which it would have to pass onto customers given the challenges facing global aviation.
And the nation's biggest employer lobby group, the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry, warned the tax would weaken the economy, dubbed the "Wonder from Down Under" which emerged strong from the global financial crisis.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
10 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
32
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (13)
How do you "sell" something based on a lie and which you lied about when you said you would not do it during the campaign to be elected?
You tell more lies, of course. The question is "Are Australians that gullible?"? I suspect that Australia will have a new Prime Minister.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
"Hello, Clarice!"
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (12)
The Australian Labor government is doing this in defiance of the wishes of most Australians, and as a consequence would face their lowest ever primary vote (27%) if the election was held tomorrow. Unfortunately, the next election is 2 years away, so we'll have to tolerate this madness for a bit longer...
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (11)
Good question Dogbert. Your own question contains a lie that provides a wonderful answer to it's own question.
You couldn't have done better if you had actually known what you were doing.
Aahahahahahahahahaha.....
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (11)
Well, at least against the wishes of you.
However the scientific community supports the Australian initiative 100 percent.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (10)
Well, at least against the wishes of 70% of the public.
However the crooked scientific community supports the Australian initiative 100 percent.
Good by Juliar 2 years and counting and you sooo gone!!!
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (12)
When Juliar Gillards Labor party is decimated in the next election, no career-minded politician will dare touch a carbon tax again, especially at a time when the science is proving to be less settled than Al Gores marital situation or his grand and failing Carbon trading scams.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (14)
Isn't it funny when people pretend that there is a "scientific community" and that that community agrees 100% on something.
LOL
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (9)
Not quite so Vendi. Much of the scientific community want a much bigger effort than this initiative which may have little impact in pollution reduction. Of course in the absence of a more intense effort then its 100% better than no effort, even if based on misrepresentation of climate change data.
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Lol. Preyy good observation.
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Jul 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I would like to make an observation in regard to claims made by the two sides of this thing. Gillard has proposed to introduce a modest tax to start with, and offer household compensation to cover the predicted increase in household energy bills. The anti-tax people are complaining that the incentives add up to more than the tax, so Gillard's plan starts as a defecite program. That isn't entirely fair though. Since an energy tax causes a ripple effect on the price of every-day goods and services, which are taxed as a % of price, the actual taxes collected by an energy tax are far greater than the base tax plan imposed on the energy producers. Unfortunately, a short time later, that increase in tax revenue is offset by directly proportional slowdowns in consumer spending. Since most people spend to the limit of their means already, they can't spend more than they make. More tax = less buying.
Jul 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
In other pictures of her she doesn't look so similar. I had a picture of the German Chancellor, Merkel, that looked so much like the Emperor from Star Wars that I actually cut and pasted her face into the Emperor's hood once, as a joke for my facebook page. No political statement was intended. I'm neutral about her. I just wanted to see if anybody could guess who she was.
Jul 13, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
Kind of. The program is broadly budget neutral. I think they're factoring in a deficit of about four billion dollars over four years, which is peanuts.
Over 90% of households will be compensated through tax cuts or pension increases, which will be indexed over the three year period as the carbon price increases.
The other good thing is that the income tax-free threshold will be increased from around six thousand dollars to $18.2k, which will mean a million or more people will pay no tax at all. These measures are designed not to bring about such a slowdown.
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
http://wattsupwit...a-medal/
http://anhonestcl...s-julia/
Jul 15, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Since
1) The effect of current and future levels of CO2 on the climate is zero.
2) The effect of more bureaucrat control (high tax) of the economy is strongly linked with pollution (see example of USSR) taxation should be cut to allow wealth to grow to a level where people choose the luxury good called environmentalism.
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)