Australia sets carbon price to fight climate change
July 10, 2011 by Madeleine Coorey
File photo shows a coal-fired power station in the Hunter Valley, near Sydney. Australia has said carbon pollution would be taxed at Aus$23 (US$24.74) per tonne to help battle climate change, in one of the nation's biggest economic reforms in years.
Australia Sunday announced plans to tax carbon pollution at Aus$23 (US$24.74) per tonne to help battle climate change, as it moves towards an emissions trading scheme similar to that of Europe.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard said there would be a fixed price on carbon pollution, blamed for global warming, from next year before a full emissions trading scheme was introduced in 2015.
"As a nation, we need to put a price on carbon and create a clean energy future," she told a news conference in Canberra.
Under the scheme to begin on July 1, 2012, about 500 of Australia's top polluters will pay a fixed price, starting at Aus$23 per tonne, for their carbon dioxide emissions for the first three years.
The mechanism would then shift into an emissions trading scheme, with a floating price set by the market. The government will set a floor price and an upper limit for at least the first three years to avoid price shocks.
Tony Wood, of the independent economics-focused think-tank the Grattan Institute at Melbourne University, said Australia's plans were an "emissions trading scheme (ETS) on training wheels".
"I think it is fundamentally an ETS and it's therefore very similar to the European scheme, the New Zealand scheme," he said, adding that if it was introduced, Australia's scheme would be the biggest outside Europe.
"This would be the only other really significant one," he said.
Gillard, whose leadership is hovering at record lows in opinion polls, said the reform would create economic incentives for the biggest polluters to reduce their emissions of greenhouse gases.
At the same time, the government will establish a $10 billion Clean Energy Finance Corporation to fund innovative projects in renewable energy.
Much of the revenue raised from the tax in the first three years will provide for higher family payments, pension boosts and income tax cuts to offset the increased cost of living as businesses factor the carbon price into the cost of their goods and services.
The package includes some $9.2 billion over three years for trade-exposed industries such as aluminium, zinc and steel manufacturing.
The odds for the price on carbon tax is displayed on the board of a betting agency in Melbourne, on July 8. Major mining companies such as BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto and Xstrata are expected to be hit by the Australian government's carbon tax, liable for a combined Aus$380 million under a conservative price of Aus$20 a tonne, according to modelling by the Australian Financial Review.
The issue of a carbon tax has been hotly debated in Australia, among the world's worst per capita polluters due to its reliance on coal-fired power and mining exports.But Gillard said there had been an "avalanche" of science on global warming, and the tax would reduce Australia's carbon emissions by about 160 million tonnes by 2020 -- the equivalent of taking 45 million cars off the road.
"This has been a difficult debate that has brought us to this moment," she said. "But we are here now and now is the time to get this done."
The prime minister has the numbers in parliament to pass the legislation but her popularity has been sinking in opinion polls since she announced plans for the tax earlier this year.
The conservative opposition has led the attack, saying the tax, which does not include agriculture, will hurt industry and send jobs offshore as well as increase the cost of living.
Climate Change Minister Greg Combet said the coal industry, would be helped to reduce pollution and maintain jobs.
Professor of taxation law at the Law School at the University of Sydney Michael Dirkis said the reform was the biggest for Australia since the introduction of the Goods and Services Tax more than a decade ago.
"The potential impact across all the whole of the Australian business... and the community at large is potentially quite large," he said.
(c) 2011 AFP
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
10 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
32
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (36)
We of the scientific community support you.
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (14)
Despite having been voted into office on the promise that she would not do this, Prime Minister Julia Gillard is going to do it anyway.
Seems America is not the only place in the world where leaders say one thing then do the opposite.
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
She probably would not have done it had she won the last election outright, rather then being forced into a minority coalition government with The Greens and some Independents. Her government stands on a knife-edge where a single by-election can cause an early general election, which means that she has to play ball.
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
Unfortunately for the Australians they've voted to power a bunch of hypocritical idiots with a "green" agenda who's raison d'etre springs from their virulently anti-nuclear stance. So they'll just pony up more for the same polluting coal powered electricity with money going to the govt.s and thier "environ-mental" cronies pockets.
Ain't that great ! It's like highway robbery with the person being robbed willingly parting with his easily earned cash.
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (15)
It is robbery. Carbon credits are just a way to rob from one group and redistribute the spoils to other groups (after taking a hefty handling charge, of course!).
What is so sad is that the people lack the tools to charge their representatives with fraud when they are defrauded.
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (15)
Please speak for yourself.
Climate change has been recorded over Earth's entire geologic history.
That compels continuous evolution of life.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (10)
We may even see real breakthroughs in power storage there, since there will be a real, operational incentive to find a way to avoid this tax, and the necessity for carbon credit trading, which as a huge boondoggle of fraud, corruption, and very, very weak regulation and certification.
The Aussies deserve our applause and support for forging ahead on this -they may be the ones that sove the problem- because it's for damn sure that the solution is unlikely to come by way of the efforts of American industry.
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (13)
You presume there is a problem ...
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
@dogbert,
I'm not "presuming" a goddam thing. Whilst you would persist in your denialist delusion, the rest of the world is faced with a VERY REAL problem, and chooses to act accordingly. If you have a financial interest in the Australian energy industry, then that's a VERY REAL problem for you, if you choose to view it as such. Or you could choose to view it as an opportunity.
Sadly, I'm sure that you will continue to coddle your delusion, since it justifies your preferred short-term economic policy, i.e. "rape and pillage".
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (13)
No, the only problem is the use of pseudo-science to justify social redistribution of resources.
The pillaging is being done by the Australian government. And you are supporting that pillaging.
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (6)
No, I'm supporting a more fair distribution of the cost of fossil fuel use, in the hopes that that cost-sharing will prove burdensome enough that industry will find a better, cleaner, more efficient way to produce and distribute power.
You know- "spurring innovation"
Jul 10, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (9)
What this will allow is billions of dollars of investment in RENEWABLE energy sources. Whteher or not you believe in man made Climate Change (I personally do) the fact remains that fossil fuels are a FINITE resource. Renewables like Solar are (for all intents and purposes) infinite. At some stage we will run out of coal but we will have plenty of solar energy available for several billion years.
If its going to cost me 0.7% to assist in the switch to renewables then I say lets do it! Hopefully the rest of the world can follow the example being set by Australia, New Zealand and Europe.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (7)
Thank you, Vendicarian.
We of the Terra Australis desperately seek approval from superior thinkers like yourself. Now we can sleep soundly again.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 0.9 / 5 (32)
No need to thank me for stating the obvious.
The Scientific community stands behind the Australian Government on this decision.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 0.8 / 5 (32)
Poor dogbert. No Thinking person seems to believe you.
You do have OmaTard on your side, but is that a good thing when he perpetually argues that the sun is a neutron star?
Ahahahahahah..... Denialist Quack Tards.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 0.5 / 5 (29)
You are mentally Ill Omatard. Get yourself to a shrink.
"Climate change has been recorded over Earth's entire geologic history." - Omatard
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 0.5 / 5 (28)
It is a way that conservative economists have proposed to internalize the negative externalities associated with pumping gigatonnes of carbon into the atmosphere every year.
"Carbon credits are just a way to rob from one group and redistribute the spoils to other groups." - DogBert
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 0.5 / 5 (29)
Aug 2 draws near.
"Seems America is not the only place in the world where leaders say one thing then do the opposite." - Dogbert
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
And what will the maintenance upkeep be on sand covered solar panels?
By the way, a carbon tax won't be enough to discourage such power sources. Why? Because no politician is going to kill their power needs premature much less their campaign funding.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (9)
The Australian Government and Labor party is now on a deathwatch, due to self-inflicted wounds!
Watch peoples standard of living nosedive. Watch industry and manufacturing flee this poor broken country thanks to the lunatics running the country.
PM JULIAR (THERE WON'T BE A CARBON TAX) Gillard may ram is hateful CO2 ETS/tax through but is spells the end of the Labor government, the slimy backstabbing independents and the greens in the next election. Maybe they can join the threatened CO2 climate destroying Camels in the lonely outback. Because they won't see anymore political power or deserve trust for the following 20 years after that, if their lucky.
2YEARS AND COUNTING JULIAR!
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.9 / 5 (9)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (10)
Ms. Gillard is without doubt the worst Prime Minister in our history, against extraordinarily stiff opposition from such totally inept predecessors as Whitlam, Fraser and Rudd, who are god like figures in the pantheon of political failure. After only 12 months in the job, she has managed to alienate huge segments of the community with every deceit, platitude, knee jerk reaction, policy catastrophe and half-baked crackpot ideology she espouses. Let her fate, and the fate of her party at the next election give pause to other world leaders who seek to perpetrate the AGW fraud. The apathy of the general public is slowly being awakened by word of mouth which is far more powerful than any propaganda methodology the spin doctors of government can dream up. This carbon tax is the ultimate pyrrhic victory for Gillard, and will be indelibly inscribed on her political headstone. So be it. Bring it on!
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
Australias largest export is coal; coal provides most of its base-load power. No nuclear. The stated aim is to prevent any more coal-fired power stations being built in a country, which has hundreds of years of coal, to cover current exports and home use.
Secondly, we shall go to a carbon trading scheme, yet there will not be enough carbon credits to cover their quota and will have to pay billions of dollars to overseas traders to reduce nominal emissions. Official economic assumptions even then are based on the rest of the world having a carbon-trading regime also. Did I mention that assumptions also presume that geothermal, solar and wind will be economically viable by then?
In summary, they throw away cheap power, risk sending all mining investments iron ore is a huge money-spinner also to other countries (Africa is just one location) which have no carbon trading or taxes and then use taxpayers money to buy their carbon credits from out of the country.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (8)
It looks like a death wish for the Australian economy. Country's like Canada will happily ship all the coal China will need and more, talk about cutting your nose off to spit your face, Juliar Gillard you are a classic example, After this is all over for you, the Labor/Greens, you will be the most despised politician in Australian history.
We will happily ship you back to Wales, free of charge.
Same offer goes for troll-man Vendicar_Decarian!
Vendicar_Decarian we don't need or want your congratulations!
Last point: for all that, Australian emissions will still INCREASE from 578 megatons of CO2 in 2009-10 to 621 megatons of CO2 in 2020!!
Jul 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jul 14, 2011
Rank: 3.5 / 5 (2)
Ted, you clearly don't understand what the Carbon Tax is designed for. Its not designed to reduce our overall emissions straight away. Its designed to SLOW the increase of our overall emissions.
As a society so dependant on fossil fuels you don't just flick a switch and start reducing emissions straight away. First you focus on slowing the increase, eventually halting it and then reducing overall emissions in the long run.
This policy was thought up by people with a lot more knowledge of the issues than you Ted. If you've got constructive criticisms to make then by all means contribute; healthy debate is the heart of Democracy after all. But maybe read up a bit first. :)
Jul 14, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
She is not at fault !
She played her own small role in a plan (1972-2011) by world leaders* (conservative/liberal, left/right, Republican/Democratic) to use science for a noble cause.
Claim AGW (Industrial CO2-Induced Global Warming) is a common enemy to unite nations, end the nuclear arms race, and avoid destruction by mutual nuclear annihilation.
The rest of the story is here:
http://anhonestcl...s-julia/
*Ronald Reagan/Al Gore, Bill Clinton/George Bush and Barack Obama too.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
My town is seeing record sea level rise and spots where I once made a living are now gone. Sooner or later your total ignorance will threaten me and mine, and then we have a problem that nobody wants.
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
How will they tax that one?