Before animals first walked on land, fish carried gene program for limbs

July 11, 2011

Genetic switch for limbs and digits found in ancient fish

Enlarge

A genetic switch taken from the skate activates a marker gene in the distal limb of the mouse embryo. Credit: Igor Schneider, University of Chicago

Genetic instructions for developing limbs and digits were present in primitive fish millions of years before their descendants first crawled on to land, researchers have discovered.

Genetic switches control the timing and location of . When a particular switch taken from fish DNA is placed into , the segment can activate genes in the developing limb region of embryos, University of Chicago researchers report in . The successful swap suggests that the recipe for limb development is conserved in species separated by 400 million years of evolution.

"The that drive the expression of genes in the digits of mice are not only present in fish, but the fish sequence can actually activate the expression in mice," said Igor Schneider, PhD, postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy at the University of Chicago and lead author on the paper. "This tells us how the antecedents of the limb go back in time at every level, from fossils to ."

The genetic hunt was inspired by a famous find – the 2004 discovery of the transitional fossil Tiktaalik in the Canadian Arctic by a team led by Neil Shubin of the University of Chicago. A transitional species between fish and the four-legged tetrapods, Tiktaalik possessed fins containing a skeletal structure similar to the limbs of later land-dwelling animals.

Those similarities – particularly the wrist and hand-like compartments present in the fins of Tiktaalik and its peers – inspired a laboratory experiment to look at the homology, or shared physical and genetic traits, of fish and limbed animals.

"This is really a case where knowing something about the fossils and the morphology led us to think about genetic experiments," said Shubin, PhD, the Robert R. Bensley Professor of Organismal Biology and Anatomy and senior author of the study. "Tiktaalik and its cousins showed us that this limb compartment is not an utter novelty in tetrapods, as was thought for a long time. So an antecedent of that program must exist."

The research team compared a genetic switch region called CsB, known to regulate limb development in humans, with similar regions in mice, chickens, frogs, and two fish species: the zebrafish and the skate. Because the last common ancestor of all these species pre-dates Tiktaalik-like "fishapods," the comparison offered a glimpse at biology before animals made their first steps on land.

Genetic switch for limbs and digits found in ancient fish
Enlarge

Genetic instructions for developing limbs and digits are shared by species separated by 400 million years of evolution. Credit: Kalliopi Monoyios, University of Chicago

Schneider and colleagues compared the CsB regions from all five species and found that certain sequences were shared between the fish species and the tetrapods. The conservation allowed the researchers to try swapping switch sequences between species to see if they could still drive gene expression in the fin or limb. Remarkably, mouse CsB could turn on gene expression at the outer edge of the developing fin region of zebrafish, and both skate and zebrafish CsB were capable of activating gene expression in the wrist and proximal digits of the mouse limb.

"These sequences function in these organisms despite 400 of separation," Schneider said. "The homologies that are perhaps not evident by morphology – just comparing a hand and a fin – can be traced back to the genome, where you find that the regulatory regions that control the making of those structures are actually present and shared between these organisms."

The results contradict a previous finding that a developmental switch from pufferfish DNA was not capable of gene expression in the limbs of mice, suggesting that tetrapods evolved a novel developmental system. But the new experiments suggest that the genetic switch controlling limb development was in fact present deep in Earth's evolutionary tree.

"There previously was the idea that these switches had to be generated from scratch de novo, but no, they already existed, they were already there," said Marcelo Nobrega, MD, PhD, assistant professor of human genetics at the University of Chicago Medical Center and another author of the study. "Maybe the key was expressing a gene earlier or later or in a specific territory, but it was just a modification of a program that was already encoded in the genomes of fish almost half a billion years ago and remains there to this day."

"These new results are actually in line with both the fossil data and the expression data," Schneider said. "So now we can tell a story where the fossils and gene expression make sense in light of the genetic regulation."

Future experiments will focus more closely on how the gene regulation system functions, examining the differences between the segments in and tetrapods that control development of either a fin or a limb. Subtle changes in the timing or location of may produce the dramatic differences in anatomy that first allowed animal life on Earth to explore land.

"There is a whole universe of questions that are opened up by this discovery," Shubin said.

More information: The paper, "Appendage expression driven by the Hoxd global control region is an ancient gnathostome feature," will be published online the week of July 11 by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Provided by University of Chicago Medical Center

4.6 /5 (17 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

racchole
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (3)
COOL
Mayday
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (10)
Okay, okay, the line has played out. I guess it has fallen to me to set the hook.
Here goes: Intelligent Design?
whoyagonacal
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 4.6 / 5 (9)
Aw c'mon, the trolls are going to show up in any case; no sense in encouraging them.
gwrede
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Heck yeah, ID. Whenever stuff goes beyond somebody's grasp.
Isaacsname
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
In before neutron repulsion
BaconBits
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (12)
Isn't the way to think about this that the fish came first, i.e. these gene switches regulated the gene expression of the skeletal/limb structure of fins and as mutations built up in these and later gene patterns emerged they were extended and emplyed for more complicated limb gene expression but that ultimately their core function remains mostly conserved over 400 million years and highly diverged fish and mammal species use the same genetic mechanism to perform similar functions. No ID in this at all, just an effective gene pattern that began working well for its host 400M years ago and still does in its decendents today.

And look at all the cool things natural selection has selected for over that period of time using that same toolkit.
komone
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Hi Mayday, yes of course, (insert your preferred god) must have put it there, and that explains it. If you are the curious type, like, say, a scientist, you may then wonder about further explanation. What was exactly was the mechanism that (insert your preferred god) defined to place this apparent anomaly inside fish. What state of the world and what rules would be necessary for this to emerge. You may find that the answer is very like some kind of evolutionary pressure. Then of course, since (insert your preferred god) defined that mechanism, the story is over, unless you are curious and ask, what exactly would be necessary for such a state and such rules to emerge.... and so it goes on.
xznofile
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
so which came first: the switch or the gene? my bet is that it controls a process that eventually developed into legs.
aroc91
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Isn't the way to think about this that the fish came first, i.e. these gene switches regulated the gene expression of the skeletal/limb structure of fins and as mutations built up in these and later gene patterns emerged they were extended and emplyed for more complicated limb gene expression but that ultimately their core function remains mostly conserved over 400 million years and highly diverged fish and mammal species use the same genetic mechanism to perform similar functions. No ID in this at all, just an effective gene pattern that began working well for its host 400M years ago and still does in its decendents today.

And look at all the cool things natural selection has selected for over that period of time using that same toolkit.


Exactly.
TheGhostofOtto1923
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
The question is, why would god put fish genes in rodents? Isn't every species supposed to be de novo in noahs world?
Telekinetic
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Pluripotent stem cells can become almost any type of cell, i.e., heart, muscle, eye, etc. I would expect that the basic building blocks of a living cell would be standardized and interchangeable between species, but that the differentiation of species lies in the area of chromosomal type and in fertilization, where particular sets of DNA recognize only their counterpart, although even there, there have been exceptions of cross breeding in animals that are closely related. Let's face it, our earliest cousins had gills, which I wouldn't mind having now.
epsi00
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
So the fish (could have ) walked before us!
Sinister1811
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
This might increase the probability of finding terrestrial (as well as aquatic) life on other planets.

This would also mean that it's possible re-engineer extinct species.
FroShow
Jul 11, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
@komone; by your post it doesn't seem to me that you've realized Mayday was trying to push buttons. In this case, ya, he trolled. But I gotta say I got a chuckle out of how he brought up an obviously controversial idea (for a physics blog).

@Sinister1811; Check out the TED talk by Jack Horner: "Building a dinosaur from a chicken": http://www.ted.co...ken.html

To me, it seems plausible that before fish there were species that moved about on the sea bed. Mobility on the sea bed would be an easier adaptation than mobility while floating in the water. Several mutations down the road, and ta-da: now life can swim and not have to cling to the 'wall'. But Life (the true intelligent designer) doesn't throw away useful code, so it keeps it in the DNA pool (maybe it's just lazy). Millennia later, when 'above the surface' is hospitable enough for Life, this old code is reactivated.

Just a theory, but plausible enough not to be stated.
yep
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Cosmic Serpent:DNA and the Origins of Knowledge by Jeremy Narby
Deesky
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
This might increase the probability of finding terrestrial (as well as aquatic) life on other planets.

Why?
Sinister1811
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (7)
@Froshow - That's interesting. Scientists have already said that it's possible. I think if they could compare the genes of various birds, and work out which genes they all have in common, they could reproduce the ancient ancestor of today's birds. They could do this with other animals as well, I think.
Sinister1811
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
This might increase the probability of finding terrestrial (as well as aquatic) life on other planets.

Why?


Why not? If the genes for limbs exist in fish, they might go back even further to say bacteria. It'd be interesting if they found the same genes in single-celled organisms.
Deesky
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: 4.7 / 5 (7)
Why not? If the genes for limbs exist in fish, they might go back even further to say bacteria.

That's a stretch - why would bacteria need limbs? Certain genetic sequences may have been co-opted later in time when multicellular organisms evolved, but you're not going to get a one-to-one mapping. In any case, what does that have anything to do with life evolving elsewhere in the universe, which was the basis of my query.
lovenugget
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
i laugh at the ID drones.

also, mudskippers are an interesting example of a fish that uses their limbs to move across dry land.
TheGhostofOtto1923
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
i laugh at the ID drones.

also, mudskippers are an interesting example of a fish that uses their limbs to move across dry land.
And humans are an interesting example of an animal that uses their limbs to move through the water.
http://en.wikiped...pothesis
frajo
Jul 14, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Similarity of two switches does not necessarily imply similarity of the switched entities. The relation between switches and switched entities could be an n:m relation.
LVT
Jul 16, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
The question is, why would god put fish genes in rodents? Isn't every species supposed to be de novo in noahs world?


ID stands for ignorant design. God's not a very competent designer.
cyberCMDR
Jul 17, 2011

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
When I read about this, I can't help but think of the ID trial where one of the lawyers supporting evolution wore a mousetrap as a tie clip. The mousetrap obviously had an original purpose, but was re-purposed for the function of keeping the tie straight. These fish genes may work with mouse genes in programming limb development, but that does not prove that was their original purpose. Same transmitter (control genes) but with a newer (upgraded?) receiver, which maintained similar control feedback mechanisms.
Sinister1811
Jul 17, 2011

Rank: 1.1 / 5 (7)
That's a stretch - why would bacteria need limbs?


To move. Certain bacteria have flagella, which helps them to move about. I don't know whether you'd classify that as like a primitive type of limb, or not but they certainly don't teleport.
Hoodoo
Jul 17, 2011

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
This gets me thinking about panspermia, not IntDesign.
Why would bacteria need limbs? Well they wouldn't. But if those hardy bacteria were taking a comet ride to the next star system, a few tricks up their sleeve (so to speak) regarding limb generation could come in handy in future iterations a long way down the track.
IscopeU
Jul 17, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
This doesn't make sense to me, but let me try. Basically what this article says is that the way limbs evolved, gradually, as the fossils show, is done by a mechanism found in this 'switch'.
Sound awesome, but they couldn't find it in an earlier experiment, now they can? Hows that...

How did this... "Maybe the key was expressing a gene earlier or later or in a specific territory, but it was just a modification of a program that was already encoded in the genomes of fish almost half a billion years ago and remains there to this day." .... "just a modification" came about in this experiment?
breadhead
Jul 17, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
http://www.mathem...s__.html

You believe then, that the bacteria originally came to life by some accident, and did so with information to make limbs?
You have greater faith than I do.
Sinister1811
Jul 17, 2011

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
I gather you have a more brilliant argument Froshow? Or do you disagree with the fact that certain bacteria use flagella to help propel their movement?
FroShow
Jul 18, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
@Sinister1811; I'm curious why you would ask me.
No one could disagree with
the fact that certain bacteria use flagella to help propel their movement.
I'd like to point out though that flagellum are an extension to single cell organisms, whereas limbs are a property of multicellular organisms; they're quite different.
BUT, a stretch of the imagination: it's possible that flagellum-like appendages could branch multiple cells, allowing for relative motion between them, thus being the start of 'limb' like structures.
I don't know whether you'd classify [flagellum] like a primitive type of limb
-Sinister1811
Sinister1811
Jul 18, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (7)
Ok, thanks for that. I was just wondering why you rated my comment so low. But anyways, you're right - Flagellum and and limbs are two completely different things. So I suppose I deserved it. I slipped up earlier when I stated that the genes might also be found in single-celled organisms. And for that, I apologize to those certain people who pointed that out.
FroShow
Jul 18, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Aside: I hate the rating system all of these forums have; you can't rate separate ideas within a single post, you can't distinguish between what you like/agree with/find relative/humorous/offensive/etc.. with a single 1-5 rating.
... which is partly why it's so easy to be offended by what people type (it's hard to remove emotion from text, we all automatically impose a 'tone' to text in order for us to interpret it).
Ethelred
Jul 18, 2011

Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
You believe then, that the bacteria originally came to life by some accident
No. And yes. Bacteria originally evolved from something that wasn't bacteria. And all mutations are at least partially an accident. However Natural Selection is what shapes the organisms over succeeding generations.

and did so with information to make limbs?
No. Bacteria don't have limbs and can't as they are single celled organisms. Limbs didn't evolve till there were multicellular organisms.

You have greater faith than I do.
I have evidence that I go on. You have faith despite the evidence. Faith when you might be right is a virtue. Faith when you are clearly wrong is just being pig headed.

The reality is that the theory of evolution is NOT a proven fact of science.
Yes it is. At least as much as gravity.>>
Ethelred
Jul 18, 2011

Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
It requires the conversion of life from non-life.
Lie. Evolution is not about how life got started it is about how life changes AFTER it started. Lying about that won't make the clear evidence of change over billions of years go away.

onversion has never been proven to be possible.
Nor proved impossible. However there is every reason to believe that it is possible.

Even the simplest life on earth, which does not require a host, is far too complex to form by a series of accidents.
True. However the simplest life is clearly vastly more complex than the earliest life. And only Creationist keep lying about it being an accident. Mutations are accidents but Natural Selection is not.

first life was a form of life which does not exist on this earth any more.
And only someone that has already told several lies would ever claim that such life should be able survive with all the more life having it for breakfast.>>
Ethelred
Jul 18, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
New genetic information, including at least one new gene, has never been observed in nature,
Purest ignorance or an utter lie. I don't know which but was just a few months ago that an article here showed a case of a modified copy of a gene in a species that still had the original and the two genes were doing different jobs. That is an increase in information.

I think that is enough of that aggressively ignorant anti-scientist. I have ripped that crap to shreds befoe.

Faith based on ignorance isn't admirable. Faith based on accepting a of pack lies supporting that ignorance is a bad thing.

Ethelred
Rank 4.6 /5 (17 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Biology / Evolution

created 14 hours ago | popularity 3.5 / 5 (14) | comments 33

More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought

(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.

Biology / Ecology

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.6 / 5 (14) | comments 18 | with audio podcast

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Biology / Ecology

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (4) | comments 7

For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)

It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.

Biology / Plants & Animals

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 7 | with audio podcast

Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams

(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, you’d never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...

Biology / Plants & Animals

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 1 / 5 (1) | comments 3 | with audio podcast report


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity

(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...