Before animals first walked on land, fish carried gene program for limbs
A genetic switch taken from the skate activates a marker gene in the distal limb of the mouse embryo. Credit: Igor Schneider, University of Chicago
Genetic instructions for developing limbs and digits were present in primitive fish millions of years before their descendants first crawled on to land, researchers have discovered.
Genetic switches control the timing and location of gene activity. When a particular switch taken from fish DNA is placed into mouse embryos, the segment can activate genes in the developing limb region of embryos, University of Chicago researchers report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The successful swap suggests that the recipe for limb development is conserved in species separated by 400 million years of evolution.
"The genetic switches that drive the expression of genes in the digits of mice are not only present in fish, but the fish sequence can actually activate the expression in mice," said Igor Schneider, PhD, postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy at the University of Chicago and lead author on the paper. "This tells us how the antecedents of the limb go back in time at every level, from fossils to genes."
The genetic hunt was inspired by a famous fossil find the 2004 discovery of the transitional fossil Tiktaalik in the Canadian Arctic by a team led by Neil Shubin of the University of Chicago. A transitional species between fish and the four-legged tetrapods, Tiktaalik possessed fins containing a skeletal structure similar to the limbs of later land-dwelling animals.
Those similarities particularly the wrist and hand-like compartments present in the fins of Tiktaalik and its peers inspired a laboratory experiment to look at the homology, or shared physical and genetic traits, of fish and limbed animals.
"This is really a case where knowing something about the fossils and the morphology led us to think about genetic experiments," said Shubin, PhD, the Robert R. Bensley Professor of Organismal Biology and Anatomy and senior author of the study. "Tiktaalik and its cousins showed us that this limb compartment is not an utter novelty in tetrapods, as was thought for a long time. So an antecedent of that program must exist."
The research team compared a genetic switch region called CsB, known to regulate limb development in humans, with similar regions in mice, chickens, frogs, and two fish species: the zebrafish and the skate. Because the last common ancestor of all these species pre-dates Tiktaalik-like "fishapods," the comparison offered a glimpse at biology before animals made their first steps on land.
Genetic instructions for developing limbs and digits are shared by species separated by 400 million years of evolution. Credit: Kalliopi Monoyios, University of Chicago
Schneider and colleagues compared the CsB regions from all five species and found that certain sequences were shared between the fish species and the tetrapods. The conservation allowed the researchers to try swapping switch sequences between species to see if they could still drive gene expression in the fin or limb. Remarkably, mouse CsB could turn on gene expression at the outer edge of the developing fin region of zebrafish, and both skate and zebrafish CsB were capable of activating gene expression in the wrist and proximal digits of the mouse limb."These sequences function in these organisms despite 400 million years of separation," Schneider said. "The homologies that are perhaps not evident by morphology just comparing a hand and a fin can be traced back to the genome, where you find that the regulatory regions that control the making of those structures are actually present and shared between these organisms."
The results contradict a previous finding that a developmental switch from pufferfish DNA was not capable of gene expression in the limbs of mice, suggesting that tetrapods evolved a novel developmental system. But the new experiments suggest that the genetic switch controlling limb development was in fact present deep in Earth's evolutionary tree.
"There previously was the idea that these switches had to be generated from scratch de novo, but no, they already existed, they were already there," said Marcelo Nobrega, MD, PhD, assistant professor of human genetics at the University of Chicago Medical Center and another author of the study. "Maybe the key was expressing a gene earlier or later or in a specific territory, but it was just a modification of a program that was already encoded in the genomes of fish almost half a billion years ago and remains there to this day."
"These new results are actually in line with both the fossil data and the expression data," Schneider said. "So now we can tell a story where the fossils and gene expression make sense in light of the genetic regulation."
Future experiments will focus more closely on how the gene regulation system functions, examining the differences between the segments in fish and tetrapods that control development of either a fin or a limb. Subtle changes in the timing or location of gene expression may produce the dramatic differences in anatomy that first allowed animal life on Earth to explore land.
"There is a whole universe of questions that are opened up by this discovery," Shubin said.
More information: The paper, "Appendage expression driven by the Hoxd global control region is an ancient gnathostome feature," will be published online the week of July 11 by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Provided by University of Chicago Medical Center
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
15 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
14 hours ago |
3.5 / 5 (14) |
33
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...

Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (3)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (10)
Here goes: Intelligent Design?
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (9)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (12)
And look at all the cool things natural selection has selected for over that period of time using that same toolkit.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Exactly.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
This would also mean that it's possible re-engineer extinct species.
Jul 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
@Sinister1811; Check out the TED talk by Jack Horner: "Building a dinosaur from a chicken": http://www.ted.co...ken.html
To me, it seems plausible that before fish there were species that moved about on the sea bed. Mobility on the sea bed would be an easier adaptation than mobility while floating in the water. Several mutations down the road, and ta-da: now life can swim and not have to cling to the 'wall'. But Life (the true intelligent designer) doesn't throw away useful code, so it keeps it in the DNA pool (maybe it's just lazy). Millennia later, when 'above the surface' is hospitable enough for Life, this old code is reactivated.
Just a theory, but plausible enough not to be stated.
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Why?
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (7)
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Why not? If the genes for limbs exist in fish, they might go back even further to say bacteria. It'd be interesting if they found the same genes in single-celled organisms.
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 4.7 / 5 (7)
That's a stretch - why would bacteria need limbs? Certain genetic sequences may have been co-opted later in time when multicellular organisms evolved, but you're not going to get a one-to-one mapping. In any case, what does that have anything to do with life evolving elsewhere in the universe, which was the basis of my query.
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
also, mudskippers are an interesting example of a fish that uses their limbs to move across dry land.
Jul 12, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
http://en.wikiped...pothesis
Jul 14, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Jul 16, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
ID stands for ignorant design. God's not a very competent designer.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (7)
To move. Certain bacteria have flagella, which helps them to move about. I don't know whether you'd classify that as like a primitive type of limb, or not but they certainly don't teleport.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)
Why would bacteria need limbs? Well they wouldn't. But if those hardy bacteria were taking a comet ride to the next star system, a few tricks up their sleeve (so to speak) regarding limb generation could come in handy in future iterations a long way down the track.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Sound awesome, but they couldn't find it in an earlier experiment, now they can? Hows that...
How did this... "Maybe the key was expressing a gene earlier or later or in a specific territory, but it was just a modification of a program that was already encoded in the genomes of fish almost half a billion years ago and remains there to this day." .... "just a modification" came about in this experiment?
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
You believe then, that the bacteria originally came to life by some accident, and did so with information to make limbs?
You have greater faith than I do.
Jul 17, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
No one could disagree with I'd like to point out though that flagellum are an extension to single cell organisms, whereas limbs are a property of multicellular organisms; they're quite different.
BUT, a stretch of the imagination: it's possible that flagellum-like appendages could branch multiple cells, allowing for relative motion between them, thus being the start of 'limb' like structures.
-Sinister1811
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (7)
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
... which is partly why it's so easy to be offended by what people type (it's hard to remove emotion from text, we all automatically impose a 'tone' to text in order for us to interpret it).
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
No. Bacteria don't have limbs and can't as they are single celled organisms. Limbs didn't evolve till there were multicellular organisms.
I have evidence that I go on. You have faith despite the evidence. Faith when you might be right is a virtue. Faith when you are clearly wrong is just being pig headed.
Yes it is. At least as much as gravity.>>
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
Nor proved impossible. However there is every reason to believe that it is possible.
True. However the simplest life is clearly vastly more complex than the earliest life. And only Creationist keep lying about it being an accident. Mutations are accidents but Natural Selection is not.
And only someone that has already told several lies would ever claim that such life should be able survive with all the more life having it for breakfast.>>
Jul 18, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
I think that is enough of that aggressively ignorant anti-scientist. I have ripped that crap to shreds befoe.
Faith based on ignorance isn't admirable. Faith based on accepting a of pack lies supporting that ignorance is a bad thing.
Ethelred