Amazon.com sales-tax issue taken up by Congress

July 30, 2011 By Marc Lifsher, Los Angeles Times

Congress is weighing into the roiling dispute between states and giant Internet retailer Amazon.com over collecting sales taxes on online purchases.

On Friday, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., is expected to introduce legislation that would require Internet-only retailers to add sales taxes to customers' bills, just as their competitors with brick-and-mortar stores do. Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., plans to introduce a similar measure in the House.

The congressional effort is aimed at closing a legal loophole created by a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that freed online and catalogue sellers from the obligation of collecting the sales tax if their businesses had no physical presence in the state where a buyer lives.

"Government shouldn't be picking winners and losers by giving a handful of companies a competitive advantage over everyone else," said Katherine Lugar, vice president of the Retail Industry Leaders Association. The Arlington, Va., trade group includes major national chains including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corp. and Best Buy Corp.

Introduction of the Durbin bill comes as California and other large states, such as New York, Illinois and Texas, are attempting to enforce new laws that would require Amazon and major electronics retailers to collect billions of dollars in sales taxes that are legally owed to the states. Seattle-based Amazon is suing to overturn New York's law and has started a referendum campaign aimed at invalidating a California statute that took effect on July 1.

Amazon has said it will not collect sales tax on purchases by California customers. But the company on Friday wrote to Durbin and Conyers saying it would support a national effort to create "a simple, nationwide system of state and local sales-tax collection, evenhandedly applied to all sellers, no matter their business model, location or level of remote sales."

States have been working on a federal solution to the Internet sales-tax collection for more than a decade, said Neal Osten, director of the Washington office of the National Conference of State Legislatures. As and the president struggle to cut the federal budget deficit and reduce support for state-run programs, collecting every dollar from the sales tax is a high priority for local leaders that "will not raise one dollar in new taxes," he said.

Osten said there is bipartisan support for the so-called Main Street Fairness Act, which would require states to sign a "Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement" before they could require retailers to collect the Internet sales tax.

(c) 2011, Los Angeles Times.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

dogbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (5)
The Democrats control the Senate, so Senator Dick Durbin bill may pass the Senate.

The Republicans control the House, so Representative John Conyers' bill is unlikely to pass the House.

As is painfully apparent from the debt ceiling negotiations, the Democrats are dead set on raising taxes at every opportunity.
frajo
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
As is painfully apparent from the debt ceiling negotiations, the Democrats are dead set on raising taxes at every opportunity.


That's ok for those who evade taxes at every opportunity.
"In 2004, the corporate lobby got together and major employers like Cisco and Apple and GE begged congress to give them a one-time tax holiday, arguing that they would use the savings to create jobs. Congress, shamefully, relented, and a tax holiday was declared. Now companies paid about 5 percent in taxes, instead of 35-40 percent.
Money streamed back into America. But the companies did not use the savings to create jobs. Instead, they mostly just turned it into executive bonuses and ate the extra cash."
[RollingStone: Corporate Tax Holiday ...]
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The US retail association is in favor of taxing internet transactions. Retailers like Wal-Mart and Target have to pay sales taxes and they argue that Amazon.com has an unfair competitive advantage by what amounts to a "tacit subsidy" by the government. Given that analysis shows Amazon could still win on high volume and low overhead even with sales taxes, it's getting hard to defend current practice.
dogbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Y8Q412VBZP21010 (what a handle!),

There is an issue you did not address. Why should New York be able to collect taxes from someone or some business in Texas? (Insert any states in the above statement).

How can one state argue that it should have the power to regulate the citizens of another state?

Some states recognize this and see opportunities. For example, the state of Tennessee has reached agreement with Amazon that Amazon may build distribution centers in Tennessee without incurring any obligation to collect Tennessee taxes. It is a win win situation.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
There is an issue you did not address.


I simply point out that the current system gives
Amazon.com a "tacit subsidy" that gives it the firm a competitive advantage over brick-and-mortar firms like Target and Wal-Mart.

The legalities of changing things are of course complicated. But giving Amazon a "tacit subsidy" is clearly an inequitable business practice supported by the government.
dogbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
But it is not a "tacit subsidy". States have the right to tax their own citizens. They have the right to require businesses operating in the state to collect those taxes at time of sale.

A state has no right whatsoever to require an out of state business to collect taxes on the state's citizens.

The courts recognized this fact when they affirmed restriction of state control to businesses with an actual retail presence in the state.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
But it is not a "tacit subsidy".


Tell that to Wal-Mart and Target. If you maintain that it is perfectly fair that they be charged sales taxes while Amazon.com can compete with them without having to pay sales taxes ... they won't agree.
Now if the mindset is "screw them", what can I say?

Obviously there are complicated legal issues here. But it is very hard to argue that the current system supports fair business practice.
dogbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
Tell that to Wal-Mart and Target.

Wal-Mart and Target are only required to collect sales taxes in states which levy sales taxes and where the store has a retail establishment.

Amazon is required to collect taxes in states which levy taxes and where the company has a retail establishment.

Currently, Target says they have no stores in Vermont. So Target is not required to collect sales taxes on Vermont citizens. Wal-Mart has a retail presence in all 50 states and so must collect sales taxes in all 50 states which have a sales tax.

Since the requirements apply to all -- Wal-Mart, Target and Amazon, it seems fair to me.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Wal-Mart has a retail presence in all 50 states and so must collect sales taxes in all 50 states which have a sales tax. Since the requirements apply to all -- Wal-Mart, Target and Amazon, it seems fair to me.


Wal-Mart must pay sales taxes everywhere; Amazon.com gets money from customers from all the exact same localities and generally doesn't pay sales taxes.

It may seem fair to you. It may seem fair to Jeff Bezos. There's no need to ask if it seems fair to Wal-Mart, because they've made it clear that they don't think it's fair. I don't think it is either.

Now there's one hell of a complicated legal argument underlying this -- but whatever the law is, Wal-Mart's getting screwed, and if you want to call them up and tell them they can get screwed for all you care, they're probably not going to be very happy with you.
dogbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Wal-Mart is very successful. They have spread to all fifty states and to most of the rest of the world. Everywhere they have gone, they must meet the legal requirements to do business in that place.

They are not "getting screwed". They can leave any state that they don't want to collect taxes for. Amazon has ceased to do business with affiliates in states which wanted Amazon to collect taxes where thy did not do business. Wal-Mart has the same options.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
They are not "getting screwed". They can leave any state that they don't want to collect taxes for. Amazon has ceased to do business with affiliates in states which wanted Amazon to collect taxes where thy did not do business. Wal-Mart has the same options.


Let me get this straight ... if Wal-Mart doesn't like the fact that they have to pay sales taxes while Amazon.com doesn't ... they can just stop doing business.

OK, I'm done here. If you can say something that silly and say you're serious, you need to start taking your meds again.
dogbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Be done then. You believe that a company must collect taxes for a state in which it has no retail presence. I don't. The courts have agreed that a company can only be required to collect taxes for a state if the company has a retail presence in the state.

You essentially want to penalize Amazon for Wal-Mart's success. The courts say that is not reasonable. I do too.
FrankHerbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 0.8 / 5 (52)
The solution is not to tax Wal-Mart or Target either DURRRRR !!!!!

(sarcasm)

Go away dogbert.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The solution is not to tax Wal-Mart or Target either DURRRRR !!!!!


"ANARCHISTS OF THE WORLD UNITE!"

"SEZ WHO?!"

Yes, I recognize a gag and am making one as well.
Doug_Huffman
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Retail Industry Leaders Association, the Arlington, Va., trade group includes major national chains including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corp. and Best Buy Corp.
Not bad, two of three whose doors I will not darken. Shop Mom & Pop. Eschew Bigbox Stores.

Good people ought to be armed as they will, with wits and Guns and the Truth.
FrankHerbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 0.7 / 5 (52)
You forgot broomsticks for raping those you disagree with Doug_bert. A = A
dogbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
FramkHerbert,

You might give consideration to participating in the discussion instead of merely trolling. You probably won't, but it is worth a try.
FrankHerbert
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 0.7 / 5 (51)
I offer you the same advice.

A = A
Sin_Amos
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
There is nothing complicated about about this. Businesses leech off communities, whether this good or bad is moot, as the idea of taxing them has to do with providing governance and services which benefits the local population, which is why you pay taxes. Now, we don't need other states or private entities siphoning money and not contributing. As a Californian, I say, get out of my state if you don't want to contribute to our populations' well-being. We don't need your business. That way, we can do business with California companies that create jobs for people here and pay taxes here. Hmmm. That simple. As 1/4 the US economy, I say, GTFO. We don't need LEECHES. We don't create markets for your benefit, so that you can take the money and run. Remember that idea of BUYING things MADE in the U.S. of A. It is the same thing, but on the state level.
ConcernedCitizen
Jul 30, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
The issue is the collection of tax that is owed by the customers. In most states, if you purchase a product via the internet that would normally be taxable at the local grocer, you are legally oblicated to pay this tax directly to the state via filling out a form and sending the amount owed. However, most people don't do this.

This has had several effects, one of which is to reduce local tax revenues that would normally have been collected by the local merchant.

Understandably, companies don't want to become the tax collector for all the local taxing authorities scattered accross the US. Just trying to get the tax amount correct is horribly complicated, and the filing requirements for the company to remit the tax that was collected is equally complex.

However, large companies like Amazon can easily do this. They don't want to only because it makes them more competitive to the extent that their customers are not paying the local sales tax they should be paying anyway.
ConcernedCitizen
Jul 31, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
No doubt this is a complex issue with many twists and turns and congress could certainly make life easier for all retailers.

As an example, the company I work for was sued by one state to pay for several years of customer-owed sales tax because we sent a trainer to a customer in the state. According to the state, this meant that we had extablished a 'physical presence' within the state and were therefore liable for collecting local sales tax even though we are only a 100 person company located in a single building in a different state.

Since that time, 10 other states have contacted us for the same reason. Needless to say, tax complience for our 100 person company has increased dramatically.

The final point to make here is that all of our customers were legally oblicated by their respective state to send the appropriate tax directly to the state. Most did not do this.

States are now getting more ruthless about going after those uncollected local taxes.
poof
Jul 31, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Dey turk ouurr taxes!
Baseline
Jul 31, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
Is this right people are expressing concern that Walmart is at a disadvantage?

There are people here arguing to levy taxes on their fellow citizens?

Seems like a very bad idea to raise taxes during a deep economic recession. How about asking legislators to cut back on spending before coming for more revenues from all of us.

Add up your total tax burden already, which most people have never done, and you will likely be shocked because there are so many hidden taxes you pay. I find it disturbing that a great number of people think their tax burden ends with their pay stubb and property tax payments.
dogbert
Jul 31, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Excellent point Baseline.

It is a bad idea to raise taxes when the economy is so depressed.
pubwvj
Jul 31, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The simple solution is a national sales tax and then eliminate all the local and state sales taxes.

While we're at it, switch to a flat tax on income (capital gains and earned income treated the same) and eliminate all personal deductions and loopholes.

Make the tax code fit on a single sheet of paper, one sided, 9 point type with 1" margins.

Make the tax forms no longer than a standard post office post card.

K.I.S.
Y8Q412VBZP21010
Jul 31, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
While we're at it, switch to a flat tax on income (capital gains and earned income treated the same) and eliminate all personal deductions and loopholes.


Flat taxes are actually fairly popular in Eastern Europe. In some of the countries the rates are kinda steep, however.
dogbert
Jul 31, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
pubwvj,

I agree about the flat tax. I argued for that for many years. It is unlikely to happen because the government uses a complicated tax system to direct, control and reward. How can we get our representatives to give up their power?

I would not support a national sales tax. The federal government does not need more taxes and taking the state's tax base away just sends more power to the federal government.
Rank 5 /5 (2 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Technology / Software

created 3 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 2

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (21) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 12 | with audio podcast report

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (15) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (11) | comments 18


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity

(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...