Amazon.com sales-tax issue taken up by Congress
July 30, 2011 By Marc Lifsher, Los Angeles Times
Congress is weighing into the roiling dispute between states and giant Internet retailer Amazon.com over collecting sales taxes on online purchases.
On Friday, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., is expected to introduce legislation that would require Internet-only retailers to add sales taxes to customers' bills, just as their competitors with brick-and-mortar stores do. Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., plans to introduce a similar measure in the House.
The congressional effort is aimed at closing a legal loophole created by a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that freed online and catalogue sellers from the obligation of collecting the sales tax if their businesses had no physical presence in the state where a buyer lives.
"Government shouldn't be picking winners and losers by giving a handful of companies a competitive advantage over everyone else," said Katherine Lugar, vice president of the Retail Industry Leaders Association. The Arlington, Va., trade group includes major national chains including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corp. and Best Buy Corp.
Introduction of the Durbin bill comes as California and other large states, such as New York, Illinois and Texas, are attempting to enforce new laws that would require Amazon and major electronics retailers to collect billions of dollars in sales taxes that are legally owed to the states. Seattle-based Amazon is suing to overturn New York's law and has started a referendum campaign aimed at invalidating a California statute that took effect on July 1.
Amazon has said it will not collect sales tax on purchases by California customers. But the company on Friday wrote to Durbin and Conyers saying it would support a national effort to create "a simple, nationwide system of state and local sales-tax collection, evenhandedly applied to all sellers, no matter their business model, location or level of remote sales."
States have been working on a federal solution to the Internet sales-tax collection for more than a decade, said Neal Osten, director of the Washington office of the National Conference of State Legislatures. As Congress and the president struggle to cut the federal budget deficit and reduce support for state-run programs, collecting every dollar from the sales tax is a high priority for local leaders that "will not raise one dollar in new taxes," he said.
Osten said there is bipartisan support for the so-called Main Street Fairness Act, which would require states to sign a "Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement" before they could require retailers to collect the Internet sales tax.
(c) 2011, Los Angeles Times.
Distributed by McClatchy-Tribune Information Services.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
10 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
3 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
2
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (21) |
56
|
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
18
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (5)
The Republicans control the House, so Representative John Conyers' bill is unlikely to pass the House.
As is painfully apparent from the debt ceiling negotiations, the Democrats are dead set on raising taxes at every opportunity.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
That's ok for those who evade taxes at every opportunity.
"In 2004, the corporate lobby got together and major employers like Cisco and Apple and GE begged congress to give them a one-time tax holiday, arguing that they would use the savings to create jobs. Congress, shamefully, relented, and a tax holiday was declared. Now companies paid about 5 percent in taxes, instead of 35-40 percent.
Money streamed back into America. But the companies did not use the savings to create jobs. Instead, they mostly just turned it into executive bonuses and ate the extra cash."
[RollingStone: Corporate Tax Holiday ...]
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
There is an issue you did not address. Why should New York be able to collect taxes from someone or some business in Texas? (Insert any states in the above statement).
How can one state argue that it should have the power to regulate the citizens of another state?
Some states recognize this and see opportunities. For example, the state of Tennessee has reached agreement with Amazon that Amazon may build distribution centers in Tennessee without incurring any obligation to collect Tennessee taxes. It is a win win situation.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I simply point out that the current system gives
Amazon.com a "tacit subsidy" that gives it the firm a competitive advantage over brick-and-mortar firms like Target and Wal-Mart.
The legalities of changing things are of course complicated. But giving Amazon a "tacit subsidy" is clearly an inequitable business practice supported by the government.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
A state has no right whatsoever to require an out of state business to collect taxes on the state's citizens.
The courts recognized this fact when they affirmed restriction of state control to businesses with an actual retail presence in the state.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Tell that to Wal-Mart and Target. If you maintain that it is perfectly fair that they be charged sales taxes while Amazon.com can compete with them without having to pay sales taxes ... they won't agree.
Now if the mindset is "screw them", what can I say?
Obviously there are complicated legal issues here. But it is very hard to argue that the current system supports fair business practice.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
Wal-Mart and Target are only required to collect sales taxes in states which levy sales taxes and where the store has a retail establishment.
Amazon is required to collect taxes in states which levy taxes and where the company has a retail establishment.
Currently, Target says they have no stores in Vermont. So Target is not required to collect sales taxes on Vermont citizens. Wal-Mart has a retail presence in all 50 states and so must collect sales taxes in all 50 states which have a sales tax.
Since the requirements apply to all -- Wal-Mart, Target and Amazon, it seems fair to me.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Wal-Mart must pay sales taxes everywhere; Amazon.com gets money from customers from all the exact same localities and generally doesn't pay sales taxes.
It may seem fair to you. It may seem fair to Jeff Bezos. There's no need to ask if it seems fair to Wal-Mart, because they've made it clear that they don't think it's fair. I don't think it is either.
Now there's one hell of a complicated legal argument underlying this -- but whatever the law is, Wal-Mart's getting screwed, and if you want to call them up and tell them they can get screwed for all you care, they're probably not going to be very happy with you.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
They are not "getting screwed". They can leave any state that they don't want to collect taxes for. Amazon has ceased to do business with affiliates in states which wanted Amazon to collect taxes where thy did not do business. Wal-Mart has the same options.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Let me get this straight ... if Wal-Mart doesn't like the fact that they have to pay sales taxes while Amazon.com doesn't ... they can just stop doing business.
OK, I'm done here. If you can say something that silly and say you're serious, you need to start taking your meds again.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
You essentially want to penalize Amazon for Wal-Mart's success. The courts say that is not reasonable. I do too.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 0.8 / 5 (52)
(sarcasm)
Go away dogbert.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"ANARCHISTS OF THE WORLD UNITE!"
"SEZ WHO?!"
Yes, I recognize a gag and am making one as well.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Good people ought to be armed as they will, with wits and Guns and the Truth.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 0.7 / 5 (52)
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
You might give consideration to participating in the discussion instead of merely trolling. You probably won't, but it is worth a try.
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 0.7 / 5 (51)
A = A
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jul 30, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
This has had several effects, one of which is to reduce local tax revenues that would normally have been collected by the local merchant.
Understandably, companies don't want to become the tax collector for all the local taxing authorities scattered accross the US. Just trying to get the tax amount correct is horribly complicated, and the filing requirements for the company to remit the tax that was collected is equally complex.
However, large companies like Amazon can easily do this. They don't want to only because it makes them more competitive to the extent that their customers are not paying the local sales tax they should be paying anyway.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
As an example, the company I work for was sued by one state to pay for several years of customer-owed sales tax because we sent a trainer to a customer in the state. According to the state, this meant that we had extablished a 'physical presence' within the state and were therefore liable for collecting local sales tax even though we are only a 100 person company located in a single building in a different state.
Since that time, 10 other states have contacted us for the same reason. Needless to say, tax complience for our 100 person company has increased dramatically.
The final point to make here is that all of our customers were legally oblicated by their respective state to send the appropriate tax directly to the state. Most did not do this.
States are now getting more ruthless about going after those uncollected local taxes.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
There are people here arguing to levy taxes on their fellow citizens?
Seems like a very bad idea to raise taxes during a deep economic recession. How about asking legislators to cut back on spending before coming for more revenues from all of us.
Add up your total tax burden already, which most people have never done, and you will likely be shocked because there are so many hidden taxes you pay. I find it disturbing that a great number of people think their tax burden ends with their pay stubb and property tax payments.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
It is a bad idea to raise taxes when the economy is so depressed.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
While we're at it, switch to a flat tax on income (capital gains and earned income treated the same) and eliminate all personal deductions and loopholes.
Make the tax code fit on a single sheet of paper, one sided, 9 point type with 1" margins.
Make the tax forms no longer than a standard post office post card.
K.I.S.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Flat taxes are actually fairly popular in Eastern Europe. In some of the countries the rates are kinda steep, however.
Jul 31, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
I agree about the flat tax. I argued for that for many years. It is unlikely to happen because the government uses a complicated tax system to direct, control and reward. How can we get our representatives to give up their power?
I would not support a national sales tax. The federal government does not need more taxes and taking the state's tax base away just sends more power to the federal government.