After three years of review, two new elements finally added to the Periodic Table

Jun 07, 2011 by Bob Yirka report

(PhysOrg.com) -- After three years of review, a committee representing the governing bodies of both chemistry and physics, has published a paper on Pure and Applied Chemistry, accepting the work of a collaborative team of physicists as proof of the creation of element 114 and element 116, finally allowing them both to be added to the official Periodic Table of Elements.

The two as yet unnamed new elements, currently going by ununquadium and ununhexium, are now the two heaviest elements on the table (289 and 292 atomic mass, respectively) and both are highly radioactive.

114 had several groups which claimed to have produced it in a lab, but just two teams had sufficient evidence for the examining committee to give approval; the Joint Institute for (JINR) in Dubna, Russia and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. The two groups collaborated on the project and both groups were also credited with offering proof of the existence of 116 as well.

The new elements came about as the result of hurtling lighter atoms together in an accelerator. To forge 116, they threw curium (96 ) and calcium (20 protons) together, which shortly thereafter decayed to 114. But they also made 114 by knocking calcium and plutonium together.

Properties of the new elements, such as how they might react with other elements, have yet to be discovered however, as both last less than a second before decaying away to other elements.

Both new elements have actually been known to exist for quite some time; as far back as 1999 different groups were said to have produced it in a lab, and most of the work done by the collaborating teams was done back in 2004 and 2006.

The two latest additions to the ignite new blather about the possible existence of a so-called “island of stability” where chemists and physicists debate the possibility of much heavier eventually joining the table; ones that will be extremely stable, and thus ripe for use right out of the box.

Traditionally the folks that produce a new element are the ones that get to name it, so for 114 and 116, that will be the next step; likely something Russian, since the Russian team gets most of the credit, and as far as the approval committee goes, it’s likely to be a smooth process, so long as, according to one committee member, “it’s not something too weird.”

Explore further: Global scientific team 'visualizes' a new crystallization process (w/ video)

More information: IUPAC announcement: www.iupac.org/web/nt/2011-06-01_elements_114_116

Discovery of the elements with atomic numbers greater than or equal to 113 (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem., ASAP article, doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-10-05-01

Abstract
The IUPAC/IUPAP Joint Working Party (JWP) on the priority of claims to the discovery of new elements 113–116 and 118 has reviewed the relevant literature pertaining to several claims. In accordance with the criteria for the discovery of elements previously established by the 1992 IUPAC/IUPAP Transfermium Working Group (TWG), and reinforced in subsequent IUPAC/IUPAP JWP discussions, it was determined that the Dubna-Livermore collaborations share in the fulfillment of those criteria both for elements Z = 114 and 116. A synopsis of experiments and related efforts is presented.

Related Stories

A new chemical element in the periodic table

Jun 10, 2009

The element 112, discovered at the Centre for Heavy Ion Research (GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung) in Darmstadt, has been officially recognized as a new element by the International Union of Pure and Applied ...

Setting out to discover new, long-lived elements

Feb 11, 2010

Besides the 92 elements that occur naturally, scientists were able to create 20 additional chemical elements, six of which were discovered at the GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research in Darmstadt.

Six new isotopes of the superheavy elements discovered

Oct 26, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of scientists at the U.S. Department of Energy's Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory has detected six isotopes, never seen before, of the superheavy elements 104 through 114. Starting ...

A galaxy of elements

Aug 15, 2005

A revamped version of the periodic table designed by an Oxford plant scientist is finding favour with chemists and non-chemists alike. A copy of the poster, which displays the elements in a ‘galactic’ spiral, ...

Recommended for you

Novel technique opens door to better solar cells

Apr 14, 2014

A team of scientists, led by Assistant Professor Andrivo Rusydi from the Department of Physics at the National University of Singapore's (NUS) Faculty of Science, has successfully developed a technique to ...

Probing metal solidification nondestructively

Apr 14, 2014

(Phys.org) —Los Alamos researchers and collaborators have used nondestructive imaging techniques to study the solidification of metal alloy samples. The team used complementary methods of proton radiography ...

Glasses strong as steel: A fast way to find the best

Apr 13, 2014

Scientists at Yale University have devised a dramatically faster way of identifying and characterizing complex alloys known as bulk metallic glasses (BMGs), a versatile type of pliable glass that's stronger than steel.

User comments : 12

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CSharpner
5 / 5 (4) Jun 07, 2011
How about Naquadah and Naquadria? :)
Ramael
not rated yet Jun 07, 2011
oooh, an island of stability, that's exciting. If stable, I wonder what applications they'll have.
Ramael
5 / 5 (1) Jun 07, 2011
haha, Naquadah. Elements so dense they warp space. :S
LivaN
5 / 5 (2) Jun 07, 2011
How about Naquadah and Naquadria? :)

haha, Naquadah. Elements so dense they warp space. :S

Indeed.
Bonkers
4.4 / 5 (7) Jun 07, 2011
But? - erm, all elements warp space, don't they.
d_robison
not rated yet Jun 07, 2011
But? - erm, all elements warp space, don't they.


Anything with mass warps space. I think they meant, "Elements so dense that they warp space noticeably." Either way it was a joke.
Yellowdart
3.9 / 5 (7) Jun 07, 2011
Still no Chucknorisium? :\
El_Nose
not rated yet Jun 07, 2011
i remember a book called "Yamato:A rage in heaven" about a black hole gun that used a superheavy conpletely stable element -- it was like element 236 or something rediculously high that occured in nature on rare planets -- it was pretty entertaining

oh and did you notice the usage of blather when describing the island of stability -- i laughed
Heepster
5 / 5 (2) Jun 07, 2011
"Traditionally the folks that produce a new element are the ones that get to name it, so for 114 and 116, that will be the next step; likely something Russian, since the Russian team gets most of the credit, and as far as the approval committee goes, its likely to be a smooth process, so long as, according to one committee member, its not something too weird."

I take it they wouldn't accept "Stalinium"...
frajo
5 / 5 (3) Jun 07, 2011
I take it they wouldn't accept "Stalinium"...
Of course not as Stalin means steely. It was only an honorable name for Iossif Wissarionowitsch Dschugaschwili who was born in a region known today as Georgia, the country.
Dubna, however, is situated in Russia, near Moscow. To assume that members of the international research center Dubna would prefer the honorable name of a not very well educated person from Georgia is more fanciful than assuming that the Livermore team would propose the name "Bushium".
SemiNerd
not rated yet Jun 07, 2011
oooh, an island of stability, that's exciting. If stable, I wonder what applications they'll have.

The so-called island of stability is very unlikely to be reachable using current technology. The reason is that the isotopes of 116 that lie at the center of this region are much more neutron rich then the isotopes so far produced. We would need such a neutron rich isotope of calcium (or neutron rich isotope of plutonium) that they would have impossibly short lifetimes, not to mention the difficulty of producing them.
antialias
not rated yet Jun 08, 2011
An 'island of stability' is also relative. Meaning that we're dealing with half lives of minutes or days here at best - not completely stable elements. (As opposed to micro/milliseconds for the elements either side of the 'island')

So don't expect any machines being built using such 'stable' transuranic elements. Also the number of atoms needed to build anything sizeable (e.g. a microstructure) far exceeds the number of atoms being produced.

The energy usage to produce any significant amount of such atoms would be exorbitant (read: probably on the order of the earth's total energy consumption to produce enough to create even the tiniest microstructure). So don't get your hopes up.

More news stories

Progress in the fight against quantum dissipation

(Phys.org) —Scientists at Yale have confirmed a 50-year-old, previously untested theoretical prediction in physics and improved the energy storage time of a quantum switch by several orders of magnitude. ...

Meteorites yield clues to Martian early atmosphere

(Phys.org) —Geologists who analyzed 40 meteorites that fell to Earth from Mars unlocked secrets of the Martian atmosphere hidden in the chemical signatures of these ancient rocks. Their study, published ...