After three years of review, two new elements finally added to the Periodic Table
June 7, 2011 by Bob Yirka
(PhysOrg.com) -- After three years of review, a committee representing the governing bodies of both chemistry and physics, has published a paper on Pure and Applied Chemistry, accepting the work of a collaborative team of physicists as proof of the creation of element 114 and element 116, finally allowing them both to be added to the official Periodic Table of Elements.
The two as yet unnamed new elements, currently going by ununquadium and ununhexium, are now the two heaviest elements on the table (289 and 292 atomic mass, respectively) and both are highly radioactive.
114 had several groups which claimed to have produced it in a lab, but just two teams had sufficient evidence for the examining committee to give approval; the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research (JINR) in Dubna, Russia and Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California. The two groups collaborated on the project and both groups were also credited with offering proof of the existence of 116 as well.
The new elements came about as the result of hurtling lighter atoms together in an accelerator. To forge 116, they threw curium (96 protons) and calcium (20 protons) together, which shortly thereafter decayed to 114. But they also made 114 by knocking calcium and plutonium together.
Properties of the new elements, such as how they might react with other elements, have yet to be discovered however, as both last less than a second before decaying away to other elements.
Both new elements have actually been known to exist for quite some time; as far back as 1999 different groups were said to have produced it in a lab, and most of the work done by the collaborating teams was done back in 2004 and 2006.
The two latest additions to the periodic table ignite new blather about the possible existence of a so-called island of stability where chemists and physicists debate the possibility of much heavier elements eventually joining the table; ones that will be extremely stable, and thus ripe for use right out of the box.
Traditionally the folks that produce a new element are the ones that get to name it, so for 114 and 116, that will be the next step; likely something Russian, since the Russian team gets most of the credit, and as far as the approval committee goes, its likely to be a smooth process, so long as, according to one committee member, its not something too weird.
More information: IUPAC announcement: http://www.iupac.o … ents_114_116
Discovery of the elements with atomic numbers greater than or equal to 113 (IUPAC Technical Report), Pure Appl. Chem., ASAP article, doi:10.1351/PAC-REP-10-05-01
Abstract
The IUPAC/IUPAP Joint Working Party (JWP) on the priority of claims to the discovery of new elements 113116 and 118 has reviewed the relevant literature pertaining to several claims. In accordance with the criteria for the discovery of elements previously established by the 1992 IUPAC/IUPAP Transfermium Working Group (TWG), and reinforced in subsequent IUPAC/IUPAP JWP discussions, it was determined that the Dubna-Livermore collaborations share in the fulfillment of those criteria both for elements Z = 114 and 116. A synopsis of experiments and related efforts is presented.
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Gibbs Free Energy Change/Entropy
2 hours ago
-
Transparency of molten substances?
May 25, 2012
-
saturated paramagnetic and ferromagnetic
May 24, 2012
-
How to calculate the bandstructure of Twisted Bilayer Graphene
May 23, 2012
-
vast computational richness from swapping one proton
May 22, 2012
-
Oscillator strength of mixed LH- and HH-excitons
May 22, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (21) |
47
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Indeed.
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Anything with mass warps space. I think they meant, "Elements so dense that they warp space noticeably." Either way it was a joke.
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
oh and did you notice the usage of blather when describing the island of stability -- i laughed
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I take it they wouldn't accept "Stalinium"...
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Dubna, however, is situated in Russia, near Moscow. To assume that members of the international research center Dubna would prefer the honorable name of a not very well educated person from Georgia is more fanciful than assuming that the Livermore team would propose the name "Bushium".
Jun 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
The so-called island of stability is very unlikely to be reachable using current technology. The reason is that the isotopes of 116 that lie at the center of this region are much more neutron rich then the isotopes so far produced. We would need such a neutron rich isotope of calcium (or neutron rich isotope of plutonium) that they would have impossibly short lifetimes, not to mention the difficulty of producing them.
Jun 08, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
So don't expect any machines being built using such 'stable' transuranic elements. Also the number of atoms needed to build anything sizeable (e.g. a microstructure) far exceeds the number of atoms being produced.
The energy usage to produce any significant amount of such atoms would be exorbitant (read: probably on the order of the earth's total energy consumption to produce enough to create even the tiniest microstructure). So don't get your hopes up.