US Supreme Court allows cholesterol drug suit

Jun 16, 2011

The US Supreme Court on Thursday allowed a class-action suit by alleged victims of the anti-cholesterol drug Baycol, which was taken off the market in 2001 by German pharmaceuticals giant Bayer.

The top US court said in a unanimous decision that lower courts were not allowed to ban class-action suits for the drug, which went on the US market in 1997 and was blamed for the deaths of 31 Americans four years later due to side effects, including fatal muscle toxicity leading to kidney failure.

Several legal cases were lodged over the drug, also known by its chemical name cerivastatin.

The suits were put together in a federal court in Minnesota, but in the case delivered to the high court, the plaintiffs were from West Virginia.

Bayer, which had argued that the class-action suit could not proceed because the judge in charge of cases in Minnesota banned such suits back in August 2005, expressed disappointment with the decision.

"Bayer is disappointed by today's ruling, which overturns a decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit that upheld a decision to prevent the proposed state economic loss class action lawsuit from moving forward," the company said in a statement.

Bayer will continue to defend this case, including on the issue of class certification, should it move forward at the state level," the company statement said.

But the Supreme Court reversed the Eighth Circuit's decision to issue an injuction that had banned a class-action suit, saying "the federal court exceeded its authority under the 're-litigation exception.'"

Bayer voluntarily recalled the drug in August 2001 after 31 deaths due to rhabdomyolysis, a breakdown of muscle tissue.

Baycol, part of the class of cholesterol-lowering drugs known as statins, was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 1997.

Explore further: Feds vows to publicize vaccine injury help program

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Court won't stop hormone replacement lawsuits

Oct 12, 2010

(AP) -- The Supreme Court won't reconsider a decision to reinstate more than 100 lawsuits filed by women who claimed that hormone replacement therapy caused breast cancer.

Court Denies Vonage Bid for Patent Case Retrial

May 04, 2007

A U.S. appeals court denies a request by Internet phone company Vonage Holdings that it order a retrial in the patent infringement case brought against it by Verizon Communications.

Recommended for you

US approves new, hard-to-abuse hydrocodone pill (Update)

Nov 20, 2014

U.S. government health regulators on Thursday approved the first hard-to-abuse version of the painkiller hydrocodone, offering an alternative to a similar medication that has been widely criticized for lacking ...

Soaring generic drug prices draw Senate scrutiny

Nov 20, 2014

Some low-cost generic drugs that have helped restrain health care costs for decades are seeing unexpected price spikes of up to 8,000 percent, prompting a backlash from patients, pharmacists and now Washington ...

Only half of patients take their medications as prescribed

Nov 20, 2014

The cost of patients not taking their medications as prescribed can be substantial in terms of their health. Although a large amount of research evidence has tried to address this problem, there are no well-established ...

User comments : 0

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.