A supernova that's super different

June 3, 2011 By Alvin Powell

A supernova that's super different

Enlarge

Supernova 2002bj was the first discovered example of a new type of exploding star. It’s just as bright as its host galaxy, the smudge to the supernova’s lower right. Credit: University of California, Berkeley

A researcher at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics believes that a new kind of supernova is at work in recent observations of bright but short-lasting stellar explosions that don’t appear to fit known categories.

Hagai Perets began working on the problem after coming across a description of a 2002 , discovered by University of California, Berkeley, researchers, whose description didn’t seem to fit into known categories. Instead of forgetting about it, he dove into past literature, looking for similar supernovas with unexplained characteristics. He found two, from 1885 and 1939.

He eventually tracked down the spectrum of the 1939 supernova on an old photographic glass plate he obtained from the Carnegie Observatories. Spectrums are important because the light coming from stars varies depending on the elements present. By examining spectrums, astronomers can tell what a star is made of and compare that with the composition of others.

After examining all the information that could be gleaned from the older observations and comparing it with the newer data, Perets said these stellar death throes are different from known supernovas in several ways. Like ordinary supernovas, they can briefly become the brightest objects in the sky, but they are more short-lived, waxing and waning in a matter of days rather than weeks, as with more typical supernova. They also eject far less material in their explosions and don’t seem to be powered by known processes.

“It’s a very good puzzle,” Perets said. “This is very strange.”

Supernovas are among the most spectacular events in the universe, marking one way that stars end their lives. They can briefly become so bright that they outshine their entire home galaxies. They’re important for another reason as well. Because stars are fueled by nuclear fusion, in which smaller, lighter elements fuse to form heavier elements, they become factories in which heavier elements such as carbon, oxygen, and iron are created. The explosions that destroy stars create even heavier elements and scatter them over large distances to places, including Earth, where they eventually can be used by living things.

Perets said that these new supernovas may result from the explosion of a kind of star called a white dwarf and that such a blast may involve only the star’s upper layers. Because white dwarf are smaller and less dense than larger ones, these new explosions may prove to be a source for intermediate elements.

“Maybe it produces a large fraction of the calcium in the universe,” Perets said. “Probably other intermediate elements are produced in higher quantities.”

Researchers at the California Institute of Technology have already uncovered another example of this type of star, called SN 2010X. Perets said more may be found now that astronomers know how to look for them, producing additional information that may help solve the mystery.

“We’re going to know more about these in the next few years,” Perets said. “It’s going to be a puzzle for theoreticians.”

Provided by Harvard University search and more info website

4.6 /5 (12 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

omatumr
Jun 03, 2011

Rank: 1.2 / 5 (18)
A supernova that's super different


To solve the mysteries of distant stars, astrophysicists must first address experimental observations that showed the Sun - the only star available for detailed study -

a.) Formed on the collapsed core of a precursor star [1,2]

b.) Acts as a plasma diffuser that enriches light elements and isotopes at the top of the photosphere [3]

c.) Is powered by repulsive forces between neutrons in the solar core [4]

Earlier data and observations are cited in [1-4]

1. Science 195, 208-209 (1977)

www.sciencemag.or...74/208-b

2. Nature 277, 615-620 (1979)

www.nature.com/na...5a0.html

3.Physics of Atomic Nuclei 69, 1847-1856 (2006)
or Yadernaya Fizika 69, number 11 (2006) (Russian)

http://arxiv.org/.../0609509

4. "Neutron Repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages (2011)

http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1

Oliver K. Manuel
Ethelred
Jun 03, 2011

Rank: 4.7 / 5 (13)
Spam spam spam spam
Spam spam spam spam
Spammity spam Cranking out spam

The Sun disagrees with you.

It does NOT have a rigid iron surface as that is impossible for a plasma of any composition. That you refuse to see this is not a sign of sanity as your position is utterly indefensible.

The Sun does not have a neutron star in it as the smallest neutron star possible is more massive than the Sun.

Any hydrogen gas on a white dwarf or a neutron star must eventually go BANG on that multi billion gravity surface.

There is no evidence for neutron repulsion. YOUR students table does not in way show that anything other than the Pauli Exclusion principle is involved.

None of those students are supporting on this so clearly they don't agree with your idea either.

Ethelred
J-n
Jun 03, 2011

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
None of those students are supporting on this so clearly they don't agree with your idea either.


Now to be fair, maybe they're not here supporting him because he treats his students like he treats his children, and not because they don't support his scientific ideas.

Twin
Jun 03, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
@J-n
"like he treats his children"

?
T2Nav
Jun 03, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
Honestly, every time I come to Physorg to read about a supercomputer or a novel new plastic or a galaxy or a rainbow, I am expecting Oliver to be there claiming it's proof that the sun is a neutron star.
Ethelred
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
"like he treats his children"


This is one of those things that you might feel that the answer is something you wished you had not found out.

If you really want to know you can google his name.

Ethelred
vidar_lund
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
@T2Nav
Him and a couple of other guys like QC are really polluting this forum. I don't want to be rude or in favor of sensorship but it does annoy me that they just keep on spamming.
Gilbert
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Censorship has an application in the interest of maintaining this website's credibility and respect. The more olivers we get on this site, the lower the level of conversation, which in turn will bring in more and more omatumors to this site, and rather soon the content will have to be "censored"(to suit their POV) anyway. Maybe there should be an IQ test in the application form to becoming a member :P
BillFox
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Yeah let's all listen to omatumr, he only molested and raped his 4 children, holy f*ck man what is wrong with you?! Any bit of validity you may have had, just went out the window. Also I didn't know they had internet in prison, but I don't think you will be so lucky in hell, I hear the best they have is aol dial up and it only gets 1kbps

@vidar - yes we all dispise qc, and apparently he got banned and is back under his new name, which I cannot recall right now.
Baseline
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
One thing one can count on here is numerous commentators willing and able to engage in an exercise of scientific pontification.

So don't let me interrupt please continue telling us all how it all works because I guess the point here isn't to engage in a dialogue of discussion that may challenge conventional theories.
BillFox
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Isn't there some process to take away his fancy title of doctor? Pretty sure if you f*ck an 11 year old girl no one cares what you say anyhow. F*cked up degenerate scum of this planet shouldn't even have a voice. Isn't there some statute that let's us take off his fingers and make him mute? I think the biggest question of all is... how the hell are you still allowed on the internet? Child molestor!
Ethelred
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
I guess the point here isn't to engage in a dialogue of discussion that may challenge conventional theories.
Oliver isn't interested in a discussion. He is spamming the site and is completely unable to answer most questions except by repeating what is in question.

Try reading his crap. I have read it. ALL of it. Its utter crap. He has ONE table, some evidence of a supernova being involved the beginning of the Solar system and from that he has decided that he has evidence that NO ONE else has a clue about physics and only he is right and by god we have no business questioning him.

His table fits the Pauli Exclusion principle and he refuses to explain why we should that as neutron repulsion which he clearly thinks is long range but won't admit to that either.

Go ahead. Try and engage in rational with him. It can't be done.

Ethelred
Ober
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Why aren't we IGNORING the idiots, rather than discussing them.
Yeah I'm guilty, simply by writing this post.
yyz
Jun 04, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
On the subject of supernovae, a relatively bright SN recently appeared in the well-known 'Whirlpool Galaxy' M 51: http://www.univer...-galaxy/

More info and observations of 14th mag(peak) SN 2011dh can be found here: http://www.astron...ead=3401

and here: http://translate....886.html

Archival images of M 51 taken between May 30th and June 2, 2011 are being sought by the Palomar Transit Factory (see requirements & contact info in the post by "avishay" at the UT link. Visual observations by suitably equipped amateurs (and those using rent-a-scope facilities) should be possible due to the proximity of M 51 to Earth.

[one caveat is that the SN will only be near peak brightness for a couple of days, though imagers should be able to follow the fading SNR for a bit longer]

Position RA 13h 30m 05s 47 10' 05"
GoldenBear12
Jun 05, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
I'm probably just missing something due to vagueness of the article, but if this event is caused by exploding upper layers of a white dwarf, what makes it different than normal novae? Or if it involves explosion of the whole white dwarf how is it different than a type 1a?
Rank 4.6 /5 (12 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
    createdMay 19, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 23 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (21) | comments 2

Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision

Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 23 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 3

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 23 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 2

Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship

(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 23 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (6) | comments 0

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.