No state lawsuits on generic drugs: US Supreme Court

Jun 23, 2011

The US Supreme Court narrowly ruled on Thursday that people may not sue generic drug makers under state laws if they believe a generic drug label failed to adequately warn of side effects.

The 5-4 ruling handed a victory to drug makers Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd of Israel, the US company Mylan Inc and Actavis Inc of Iceland by blocking three consolidated lawsuits against them.

Plaintiffs had argued that they suffered a neurological disorder called tardive dyskinesia after taking the generic anti-heartburn drug metoclopramide (Reglan, Metozolv), which they said did not contain adequate .

The plaintiffs were prescribed the for Reglan in 2001 and 2002.

As early as 1985, evidence began to surface that long-term use of the drug could have serious side effects, but strong warnings were not added to the brand name drug labels by federal regulators until 2004 and 2009.

In 2009, the ordered its strongest black box label warning that "metoclopramide can cause tardive dyskinesia, a serious movement disorder that is often irreversible... treatment with for longer than 12 weeks should be avoided in all but rare cases."

Even though the plaintiffs were prescribed the before the stronger labels were federally ordered, they argued that the state should have done more to protect them by changing the generic because there was evidence to suggest long-term use could be harmful.

They sued the generic manufacturers under state tort laws that said the companies should have taken steps to protect consumers.

However the US high court said that federal laws require generic drugs to have the same labels as the brand names they copy, so courts could not demand they meet a different state standard at the same time.

"State tort law places a duty directly on all drug manufacturers to adequately and safely label their products," said the decision read by Justice Clarence Thomas.

"If the manufacturers had independently changed their labels to satisfy their state-law duty, they would have violated federal law.

"Thus, it was impossible for the manufacturers to comply with both their state-law duty to change the label and their federal law duty to keep the label the same."

The four liberal justices -- Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan and Stephen Breyer -- dissented.

"As a result of today's decision, whether a consumer harmed by inadequate warnings can obtain relief turns solely on the happenstance of whether her pharmacist filled her prescription with a brand-name or generic drug," said Sotomayor.

The decision affects 75 percent of all prescription drugs dispensed in the United States, the court said. When a generic is available to substitute for a brand name drug, the generic version is given out 90 percent of the time.

Explore further: Police seize millions in huge fake Viagra swoop

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Generics controversy issue widens

Jun 05, 2006

A dispute between the U.S. Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission over generic drugs is reportedly widening with implications for the drug firms.

European office withdraws Nexium patent

Dec 21, 2006

The European Patent Office, answering a generic drug maker's challenge, withdrew a patent on Britain-based AstraZeneca PLC's heartburn treatment, Nexium.

FDA requires strong amputation warning on sedative

Sep 16, 2009

(AP) -- Makers of injected promethazine, a sedative also used to treat nausea and vomiting, are being required to put the strongest warning possible on the product because it can cause tissue damage leading to amputation, ...

Generic pediatric AIDS Drug gets U.S. OK

Jun 28, 2006

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has tentatively approved the generic version of Abacavir Sulfate Oral Solution for use by pediatric AIDS victims.

Recommended for you

Novartis Japan admits concealing drug side effects

Sep 01, 2014

The Japanese unit of Swiss pharma giant Novartis has admitted it did not report more than 2,500 cases of serious side effects in patients using its leukaemia and other cancer drugs, reportedly including some fatalities.

Most US babies get their vaccines, CDC says

Aug 28, 2014

(HealthDay)—The vast majority of American babies are getting the vaccines they need to protect them from serious illnesses, federal health officials said Thursday.

Expression of privilege in vaccine refusal

Aug 27, 2014

Not all students returning to school this month will be up to date on their vaccinations. A new study conducted by Jennifer Reich, a researcher at the University of Colorado Denver, shows that the reasons why children may ...

User comments : 0