Nearby galaxy boasts two monster black holes, both active
Viewed in visible light, Markarian 739 resembles a smiling face, with a pair of bright cores underscored by an arcing spiral arm. The object is really a pair of merging galaxies. Data from Swift and Chandra reveal the eastern core (left) to be a previously unknown AGN; past studies already had identified an AGN in the western core. The two supermassive black holes are separated by about 11,000 light-years. The galaxy is 425 million light-years away. Credit: Credit: SDSS
(PhysOrg.com) -- A study using NASA's Swift satellite and the Chandra X-ray Observatory has found a second supersized black hole at the heart of an unusual nearby galaxy already known to be sporting one.
The galaxy, which is known as Markarian 739 or NGC 3758, lies 425 million light-years away toward the constellation Leo. Only about 11,000 light-years separate the two cores, each of which contains a black hole gorging on infalling gas.
The study will appear in a forthcoming issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Video: Zoom into Markarian 739, a nearby galaxy hosting two monster black holes. Using NASA's Swift and Chandra, astronomers have shown that both black holes are producing energy as gas falls into them. The object is only the second-known binary active galactic nucleus within half-a-billion light-years. (No audio. Animation begins with visible light view of Markarian 739 and transitions into an artistic rendering of the two black holes. Credit: NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center)
"At the hearts of most large galaxies, including our own Milky Way, lies a supermassive black hole weighing millions of times the sun's mass," said Michael Koss, the study's lead author at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., and the University of Maryland in College Park (UMCP). "Some of them radiate billions of times as much energy as the sun."
Astronomers refer to galaxy centers exhibiting such intense emission as active galactic nuclei (AGN). Yet as common as monster black holes are, only about one percent of them are currently powerful AGN. Binary AGN are rarer still: Markarian 739 is only the second identified within half a billion light-years.
Many scientists think that disruptive events like galaxy collisions trigger AGN to switch on by sending large amounts of gas toward the black hole. As the gas spirals inward, it becomes extremely hot and radiates huge amounts of energy.
Since 2004, the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) aboard Swift has been mapping high-energy X-ray sources all around the sky. The survey is sensitive to AGN up to 650 million light-years away and has uncovered dozens of previously unrecognized systems. Follow-up studies by Koss and colleagues published in 2010 reveal that about a quarter of the Swift BAT AGN were either interacting or in close pairs, with perhaps 60 percent of them poised to merge in another billion years.
"If two galaxies collide and each possesses a supermassive black hole, there should be times when both black holes switch on as AGN," said coauthor Richard Mushotzky, professor of astronomy at UMCP. "We weren't seeing many double AGN, so we turned to Chandra for help."
Swift's BAT instrument is scanning one-tenth of the sky at any given moment, its X-ray survey growing more sensitive every year as its exposure increases. Where Swift's BAT provided a wide-angle view, the X-ray telescope aboard the Chandra X-ray Observatory acted like a zoom lens and resolved details a hundred times smaller.
For decades, astronomers have known that the eastern nucleus of Markarian 739 contains a black hole that is actively accreting matter and generating prodigious energy. The Chandra study shows that its western neighbor is too. This makes the galaxy one of the nearest and clearest cases of a binary AGN.
The distance separating the two black holes is about a third of the distance separating the solar system from the center of our own galaxy. The dual AGN of Markarian 739 is the second-closest known, both in terms of distance from one another and distance from Earth. However, another galaxy known as NGC 6240 holds both records.
How did the second AGN remain hidden for so long? "Markarian 739 West shows no evidence of being an AGN in visible, ultraviolet and radio observations," said coauthor Sylvain Veilleux, a professor of astronomy at UMCP. "This highlights the critical importance of high-resolution observations at high X-ray energies in locating binary AGN."
Provided by
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
32
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Jun 10, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (8)
What would happen if a supermassive black hole collided with a similar anti-black hole?.
makes you wonder.
Jun 10, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
What gave you that idea?
The universe is thought to consist - excepting the fleetingly short existance of singular particles - entirely of matter.
Jun 10, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (11)
Now, if the hole and the "anti-hole" had accretion disks of normal- and antimatter, there would be considerable fireworks as the disks merged.
Studies of the cosmos reveal no significant accumulations of antimatter, however, and the cosmologists are still trying to find out exactly why this is the case.
Jun 10, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (5)
This just give me a crazy idea. The Big Bang is not just the creation of the normal matter universe but also a symetrical creation of an antimatter universe going in the opposite direction/dimension/whatever from the one Singularity, just like in particle physics when a certain type of particle decay. Then the symetry would be preserved as a whole.
Jun 10, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (3)
Jun 10, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (5)
I wonder how long it will take to figure out these black holes' trajectories and orbiting pattern? We might get to see two AGN's collide in a few hundred thousand years.
Jun 11, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (13)
Jun 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jun 11, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Possibly. They certainly have upset your sensibilities...
But until you have a better idea, the best one is the one we have, and it is the one we are going to have to work with.
You know... That is the way science works. One would have thought that you would have noticed.
Jun 11, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Your question is meaningless.
What is the function of a circle?
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (4)
A question is only meaningless to someone incapable of answering it.
I'm suggesting that there may be an ecosystem, not just on earth, but in space. A circle is a line that represents a simple geometric shape, that is ITS function, while a black hole is actual as far as what's presently known. Things that are real serve, for the most part, some type of function.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 3.8 / 5 (4)
As for their function, it is very possible that if it was not for the super massive black holes, then there wouldn't be galaxies and by now, most matter would be distributed around the universe as nebulas, neutron stars and smaller black holes.
And finally "Could its role be to collect detritus like a drain and recycle and re-emit its energy?" Black holes can not emit energy, quasars are caused by the magnetic field acting on the accretion disk, channelling it away from the black hole before it goes in.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
A barber cuts the hair of everyone in the town who doesn't cut his own hair. Who cuts the hair of the barber?
The rest of your comment is meaningless.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Galaxies like ours, hold many black holes in their core because galaxies like ours are the result of the merging of numerous smaller galaxies - each of which contained it's own central black hole.
This is the general belief, but we all know that it is supposition since we can't distinguish between a galaxy that has no black hole at it's core and one that has an inactive and hence invisible one at it's core.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
physics.about.com/od/astronomy/f/hawkrad.htm
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
"A barber cuts the hair of everyone in the town who doesn't cut his own hair. Who cuts the hair of the barber?"
He could easily cut it himself, like I have for over thirty years because I do a better job than a barber.
You will never be an Einstein, Hawking or even the smartest person in the room because of your lack of imagination, which is critical to devising incisive questions.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Which violates the condition set in the first sentence.
Zoom... and it went right over your head.
Hugh? Wha? What head? Over?
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Possibly. But they have to be really small. Like the size of this (.) dot.
The presumption is that a range of sizes were produced in the early moments of the big bang. At least 100 billion that were large enough to not evaporate.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
No black hole is capable of emitting any energy, unless you count Hawking's radiation, but that is not energy from the black hole, that is energy from empty space from around the black hole and the black hole loosing energy in order to stabilise the energy dept.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
The answer is ambiguous because of the implicitness but i will give you an answer:
(x - h)^2 plus (y - k)^2 = r^2
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
That can be taken to be the definition of a circle.
I didn't ask that. I asked for it's function.
Try again.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Probably. There are after all, an infinite number of points inside.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Pointless, drivel which is not salient to the discussion at hand.
Such failure is commonly seen coming from the clueless who post things they do not understand to threads they do not comprehend in order to be part of a discussion they don't have the capacity to be involved in.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
So you don't buy the prevailing notion that the virtual particles that pass below the event horizon subtract from the mass of the Black Hole?
I must say that the magic ability to subtract energy from a black hole in this manner has not been adequately justified to me either.
Yet it is the prevailing notion.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
It goes something like this. The high energy inherent in the gravitational field of a massive BH creates REAL particle/antiparticle pairs. If one of the particles makes its way inside the BH, the other is radiated away. As a result, the BH loses net energy (as it contributed to making 2 real particles, but only recouped the energy from 1). So total BH energy and its effective mass decrease because of mass/energy equivalence.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Why don't you help each other?
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
The Tards are beyond help for the most part.
Others can be redeemed.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Well... No.. the particle/antiparticle pairs are constantly being created of their own accord. It is the nature of the vacuum.
You are wrong in your presentation, but thank you anyways you have helped me fathom the correct answer. Although it is also questionable.
The real answer follows.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
The second particle escapes, taking it's mass and some gravipotential energy from the BH.
Since the infalling particle can not add to the external gravipotential energy of the BH and since the outflowing particle does, it would appear that the external gravitational field of the BH is reduced, and since this is claimed to reflect it's mass, it's mass must be reduced as well.
It is the last statement that is questionable.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I haven't bothered reading most of the comments since they appear to be mostly nonsense, but this one is at least correct and written in an intelligent way.
Nice article, no new information really, but it was entertaining to read.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
"That's a mystery, how these black holes selectively put that much energy into the jets without producing much light," study team member Christopher Reynolds from the University of Maryland told Space.com.
Space bubbles
Most of the energy in the jets is being emitted as radio waves, but in at least one of the black holes studied, the energy was in the form of more energetic X-rays.
"The energy in these jets is absolutely huge, about a trillion trillion trillion watts," Allen said.
Now, who should I believe, a Stanford University physicist or a pimple-faced brat with no credentials? Any ideas, V.D.?
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
No, not quite. *Virtual* particles are always being created in the vacuum, true, but ones close to the BH have a chance of becoming *real* particles/antiparticles (ie, non-virtual), and that takes energy borrowed from the BH.
I find your version harder to fathom frankly - but maybe that's just me.
Jun 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Huh? The infalling is already adding to the "gravipotential energy" maybe? Matter makes gravity stronger. Don't really follow what he is saying either.
VD do you see a singularity existing in the BH? My feeling is that singularities are artifacts of an incomplete theory of gravity, but right up to the limits it works pretty well so it is hard to find fault except in such extreme conditions as a BH. (We'll leave the other extreme alone.)
Jun 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Yes, that is what it generally meant, or it can be interpreted that virtual particle pairs have positive and negative energy, which normally results in annihilation away from a BH's influence.
Jun 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
They are particle/antiparticle pairs - photon's are their own antiparticles so they can be photon pairs as well.
"The infalling is already adding to the "gravipotential energy" maybe? Matter makes gravity stronger. Don't really follow what he is saying either." - Pyle
The infalling particle doesn't fall in from the outside of the event horizon. It is created inside the event horizon and hence can not escape. What is more important is that no field that it generates can escape either. This means that at some distance from the event horizon, the particle is undetectable, even it's gravitational field. So, the infalling particle adds nothing to the external gravitational field.
The outgoing particle though does carry some energy and some gravity away from the black hole. So the external gravitational field is reduced.
Now, IF it is true that an objects external gravitational field is a ... cont....
Jun 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Now we may if we wish say that the BH's internal mass has increased, but we can never know based on it's external gravitational field. But one thing we can say is that if it is true that the internal mass increases, then General Relativity is wrong.
There is at least one argument that can be made that provides another line of reasoning as to why the infalling particle reduces the BH mass.
Consider that due to radiation, a condition where the BH mass approaches zero. Eventually releasing 1 photon will cause it to simply no longer exist. If there is increased matter inside, where does it go when the last photon emitted causes the BH to vanish?
Jun 18, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
No. Quantum effects will make it's boundary fuzzy and it's edge ill defined but finite in size.