Dam risk to Murray-Darling wetlands may be underestimated

Jun 07, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Computer modelling used to develop the Murray-Darling Basin Plan may have significantly underestimated the effects of building dams and diverting water on the internationally listed Macquarie Marshes wetlands, according to a new study.

“This may have profound implications for the decisions currently being considered by government in relation to the basin plan, certainly for the Macquarie Marshes and elsewhere if there are similar findings," says Professor Richard Kingsford, Director of the Australian and Rivers Center, an author of the study published in the international journal Environmental Management.

Kingsford and his colleague, Dr. Shiquan Ren, statistically analysed changes in flows to the Macquarie Marshes on the Macquarie River before dams and diversions occurred and then afterwards. They found that the hydrological model used for the Macquarie River for managing the river and underpinning the basin plan, underestimated the average annual impact of reduced flows to the Macquarie Marshes by 16%.

Government hydrological modelling estimated that annual average flows had been cut by dams and river regulation by only about a 27%, but the new modelling estimates the flow reduction at 43%. The Guide to the Basin Plan has recommended that there should be return of about an additional 10% of the flows to the Macquarie River.

To ensure that their analyses were accurate, the researchers also compared outputs from their statistical modelling and the government hydrological models to actual data from flow gauges on the river. The researchers found good agreement between actual data and outputs from their statistical models. According to Kingsford: “The hydrological model used for the basin planning tended to underestimate flows before dams were built and overestimated flows after dams were built. That’s the nub of the problem causing the disparity”.

These results, the first independent assessment of hydrological modelling anywhere in the Murray-Darling Basin sends a strong warning to governments deciding the future of the basin and how much water should be returned to the rivers, says Professor Kingsford: “If we found similar results elsewhere, it would mean a significant jump in the amount of flow that we should be returning to basin rivers for sustainability." "Certainly most environmental scientists working in the Murray-Darling Basin over the last 50 years have been struck by the scale of degradation with large areas of dead river red gums, declining waterbird populations, water quality issues and general declining health of the river."

The modelling differences were primarily when the river reached the complex wetland system. According to Kingsford: "The hydrological model used for the basin planning figures in the Macquarie did not cope well with measuring the impact on the wetland but all models line up well in their predictions higher up the river.” The study concluded that this reflects the purpose of many hydrological models that underpin the basin plan: they were originally designed to manage the river for irrigation, not for the complexity of large wetland systems. This also has implications for environmental flow management. “We need modelling systems that better mirror the hydrological variability because this is a window into the ecological intricacies of these wetlands which are so important for biodiversity” says Kingsford.

Explore further: Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

More information: The paper “Statistically Integrated Flow and Flood Modelling Compared to Hydrologically Integrated Quantity and Quality Model for Annual Flows in the Regulated Macquarie River in Arid Australias” is online www.springerlink.com/index/U25VK12T571760U8.pdf

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Rivers buckle under pressure from climate, dams

Mar 21, 2011

Climate change is likely to intensify the alarming rate of degradation of the world’s rivers and wetlands unless water resources are better managed, according to a special issue of the international scientific journal ...

Weeds and the Murray

Feb 15, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- A new study has revealed that human-induced changes in the flow of the Murray River has led to mass weed invasion and reduced biodiversity in wetlands along the riverbank, highlighting the need for a review ...

Recommended for you

Dead floppy drive: Kenya recycles global e-waste

16 hours ago

In an industrial area outside Kenya's capital city, workers in hard hats and white masks take shiny new power drills to computer parts. This assembly line is not assembling, though. It is dismantling some ...

New paper calls for more carbon capture and storage research

21 hours ago

Federal efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions must involve increased investment in research and development of carbon capture and storage technologies, according to a new paper published by the University of Wyoming's ...

Coal gas boom in China holds climate change risks

Aug 22, 2014

Deep in the hilly grasslands of remote Inner Mongolia, twin smoke stacks rise more than 200 feet into the sky, their steam and sulfur billowing over herds of sheep and cattle. Both day and night, the rumble ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

GSwift7
not rated yet Jun 09, 2011
Yeah, that's right. Don't build clean, cheap and safe hydro power. Keep claiming that hydro dams will destroy the wetlands although there are myriad examples of places where the dams have been used to PRESERVE and RESTORE the wetlands for decades, just like here in South Carolina. Dams can be use to effectively control natural damage to the wetlands from flood and drought too.
GSwift7
not rated yet Jun 09, 2011
Even if you are willing to accept his claim that the dam would completely destroy some wetland area, you have to balance that against whether you think the rich lake ecosystem created behind the dam has value equal to the wetland. It is probably not a zero sum equation, so you have to judge whether it would be net positive or net negative. It doesn't look like he weighed that side of the scales.